Sentences with phrase «proposals are in the pipeline»

Though reform of the voting system was not promised there have more recently been indications that proposals are in the pipeline.

Not exact matches

Nor does it follow, as has been widely speculated upon in the media, that Enbridge's Northern Gateway pipeline proposal represents an alternative to Keystone XL.
«The conflicts over pipelines now have in some way been inspired by Clayoquot Sound, and if there's ever a time when one of the two big pipeline proposals in BC... get approved, I think you'll see a civil disobedience campaign that will dwarf the one that occurred in Clayoquot Sound.»
He cautioned any twinning of the pipeline would be «transformative change» that would present «a challenge and a problem for us» but that it would be up to Kinder Morgan to bring back proposals that are defensible and in the public interest.
Simply churning out sales proposals without a larger sense of strategy and discipline in your B2B lead generation is likely to leave you with a full pipeline of sales leads that never get resolved.
The proposals have been in the pipeline for a while, and were released amid growing uncertainty that the Department of Labor's (DoL) own rule, the fiduciary standard rule, which applies only to retirement brokers, will be stricken from the records on the May 8.
You'll also have a top - to - bottom view of the sales pipeline with data on exactly what stage every proposal, quote, and contract is in real - time.
The Pilgrim Pipeline proposal has also raised objections among town officials in Rosendale and New Paltz, which are along the pipeline route, as well as from Rochester, Marbletown, and Woodstock in Ulster County and Rhinebeck in Dutchess County.
While the city's request has been winding its way through the regulatory pipeline for a number of years, the governor's office has given no indication regarding his intentions in terms of whether or not, as one of eight Great Lake states governors with veto power over the proposal, he will vote to approve the unprecedented water diversion.
In an statement via email, New York State Thruway Authority spokesman Dan Weiller said, «There is no pipeline proposal before the Thruway Authority at this time and any decision to proceed with a project would require a thorough analysis by Thruway, compliance with all applicable laws and regulations, and approval by the board of directors.
Instead, NIH and NSF recovery dollars will go overwhelmingly for 2 - year extramural research grants, mostly for proposals already submitted by people «established enough to already be in the [funding agency] pipeline,» says labor market economist Paula Stephan of Georgia State University in Atlanta.
Although there were other grant proposals in the pipeline, none of them had yet been awarded and people were starting to get nervous — nervous enough to consider picking up the whole operation and moving to the other side of the state in search of money.
Proposals have been put forward to set up the pipeline so that the downward flow of the water goes through a hydroelectric plant that would in turn power a desalination plant, providing up to 850 million m3 of fresh water per year to the parched region.
CPRIT spokesperson Ellen Read said that agency staff members are seeking «clarification» on what the moratorium means for proposals already in the pipeline.
The proposal is the latest in a series of planned pipelines and expansion projects as a flood of crude from the oil sands and the Bakken shale oil field stretches existing networks.
Malloy is so incredibly committed to the privatization of Connecticut's public schools that he even added funding for two more charter schools despite the fact that there are no additional, approved charter school proposals even in the pipeline.
Michael Levi (and others) argue that the tar sands oil will be developed regardless of what the U.S. decides on Keystone XL — if we don't use, it someone else will — but this overlook the very serious opposition to other pipeline proposals in Canada.
U.S. permits for multiple proposed Canadian tar sands pipelines should be considered in light of an overall climate change strategy, rather than the current practice of considering each energy infrastructure proposal on a project - by - project basis.
«With a renewed focus on climate change in the U.S., and as a decision approaches on the high - profile Keystone XL pipeline proposal, Canada's track record on greenhouse gas pollution is under the microscope.
B.C. premier Christy Clark is speaking out about the powerful, foreign interests that are using their wealth to interfere in the federal hearings into the Northern Gateway pipeline proposal.
And if Canadian Big Oil giant Enbridge and its allies in Canada's Federal Government have their way, and the massive Northern Gateway pipeline / tanker route proposal is approved, the whales may leave this place forever.
The Keystone XL pipeline proposal was dealt yet another blow this week when the world's most influential newspaper decried the project as dangerous and not in keeping with U.S. President Barack Obama's commitment to doing whatever he can to limit the impacts of climate change.
In 2011, in his role as chair of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, Kerry promised a careful review of the pipeline proposal but didn't say he was opposed: «There's a lot at stake here and I'll do my best to leave no question unanswered including every possible economic and environmental consideration before a final decision is made.&raquIn 2011, in his role as chair of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, Kerry promised a careful review of the pipeline proposal but didn't say he was opposed: «There's a lot at stake here and I'll do my best to leave no question unanswered including every possible economic and environmental consideration before a final decision is made.&raquin his role as chair of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, Kerry promised a careful review of the pipeline proposal but didn't say he was opposed: «There's a lot at stake here and I'll do my best to leave no question unanswered including every possible economic and environmental consideration before a final decision is made.»
The email said: «We have two very significantly - scaled wind farm proposals in the pipeline for Clashindarroch... they are probably below the radar for most at the moment.
After gutting most of Canada's federal environmental legislation to expedite tar sands development and pipeline proposals at the behest of the oil industry, now the federal government is making it more difficult, and in some cases impossible, for members of the public to participate in the National Energy Board's (NEB) review of Enbridge's proposal to reverse its Line 9 pipeline through southern Ontario and Quebec.
Under the new rules, which the NEB put in place at the direction of the federal government in response to overwhelming opposition from the public during the NEB's review of the Northern Gateway pipeline, Ontario residents who live along the 639 - kilometre pipeline route and want to submit public comments about their concerns — are you ready for it — fill out a long and complex application to ask permissionfrom the NEB, Canada's pipeline regulator, before they can even submit a letter to the NEB on the Line 9 pipeline proposal.
Meanwhile, yet another pipeline company has put on the table yet another pipeline proposal to get Alberta's dirty and dangerous — just ask the people in Marshall, Michigan and Mayflower, Arkansas — crude to the ocean so it can be shipped overseas in supertankers.
Under the new rules, which the NEB put in place at the direction of the federal government in response to overwhelming opposition from the public during the NEB's review of the Northern Gateway pipeline, Ontario residents who live along the 639 - kilometre pipeline route and want to submit public comments about their concerns — are you ready for it — fill out a long and complex application to ask permission from the NEB, Canada's pipeline regulator, before they can even submit a letter to the NEB on the Line 9 pipeline proposal.
One intriguing large - scale hydrogen economy idea is an ambitious proposal for a gas pipeline across NE Asia, to be fed with hydrogen gas (plus some methane) produced by power from wind and geothermal energy sources, and in particular the large wind energy potential that exists along the Aleutian Islands and Kamchatka Peninsula.
But the truth is that the Government of British Columbia, strangely, doesn't have much of a say in either approving or disapproving the pipeline proposals.
In a major victory for the environmental movement, the Obama administration has announced that the State Dept will be re-reviewing the proposal and considering alternate routes for the controversial pipeline.
In April when the State Department released a draft of its environmental assessment of the Keystone XL proposal that suggested much more oil will be shipped by rail without the pipeline, I wrote:
In this commentary — featured on www.midhudsonnews.com in April of 2016 — Scenic Hudson President Ned Sullivan reviews pending proposals to construct petroleum pipelines through the Hudson Valley and explains why valley communities are rallying in oppositioIn this commentary — featured on www.midhudsonnews.com in April of 2016 — Scenic Hudson President Ned Sullivan reviews pending proposals to construct petroleum pipelines through the Hudson Valley and explains why valley communities are rallying in oppositioin April of 2016 — Scenic Hudson President Ned Sullivan reviews pending proposals to construct petroleum pipelines through the Hudson Valley and explains why valley communities are rallying in oppositioin opposition.
Kinder Morgan would like us to believe that their Trans Mountain pipeline project in British Columbia is a better proposal than the one Enbridge has put forward, and that they're a more responsible company.
It seems more and more like the Enbridge pipeline proposal is dead in the water.
The company plans to file its official application to the National Energy Board for its new pipeline project — which is equal in size to the Enbridge proposalin late 2013.
Whistleblowers in the federal government revealed that they were pressured «to give cabinet a legally - sound basis to say «yes»» to the pipeline and tanker proposal,» one month before the pipeline was actually approved.
Included in this report is a recently released evaluation by Dr. Thomas Gunton and Sean Broadbent, who evaluated the Kinder Morgan's spill risk assessment method in 2013, concluding that the expansion proposal has a 99 per cent risk of pipeline and tanker spills, when it is examine using standard methodology.
Since the recent federal election there has been much discussion (and as my colleague Eugene Kung notes, an abundance of open letters) about the Liberal party's election promise to «review Canada's environmental assessment (EA) processes and introduce new, fair processes» for reviewing projects (or re-reviewing them, as in the case of major proposals like the controversial Kinder Morgan and Energy East oil sands pipeline and tankers projects).
There are many high - profile, contested proposals nationwide, including the Enbridge «Northern Gateway» pipeline that would carry Alberta oil across northern British Columbia en route to Asia, and the controversial «Ring of Fire» mineral discovery, located on or near the traditional lands of several First Nations in Northern Ontario.
Cradle Through College Coalition, of which Committee for Children is a member, sent letters to House and Senate leadership in response to their respective budget proposals urging them to make stronger investments in high - quality early learning, K — 12 education, pathways for postsecondary education, stability for vulnerable students, and building a strong pipeline of education from early childhood to early adulthood.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z