Though reform of the voting system was not promised there have more recently been indications that
proposals are in the pipeline.
Not exact matches
Nor does it follow, as has
been widely speculated upon
in the media, that Enbridge's Northern Gateway
pipeline proposal represents an alternative to Keystone XL.
«The conflicts over
pipelines now have
in some way
been inspired by Clayoquot Sound, and if there
's ever a time when one of the two big
pipeline proposals in BC... get approved, I think you'll see a civil disobedience campaign that will dwarf the one that occurred
in Clayoquot Sound.»
He cautioned any twinning of the
pipeline would
be «transformative change» that would present «a challenge and a problem for us» but that it would
be up to Kinder Morgan to bring back
proposals that
are defensible and
in the public interest.
Simply churning out sales
proposals without a larger sense of strategy and discipline
in your B2B lead generation
is likely to leave you with a full
pipeline of sales leads that never get resolved.
The
proposals have
been in the
pipeline for a while, and
were released amid growing uncertainty that the Department of Labor's (DoL) own rule, the fiduciary standard rule, which applies only to retirement brokers, will
be stricken from the records on the May 8.
You'll also have a top - to - bottom view of the sales
pipeline with data on exactly what stage every
proposal, quote, and contract
is in real - time.
The Pilgrim
Pipeline proposal has also raised objections among town officials
in Rosendale and New Paltz, which
are along the
pipeline route, as well as from Rochester, Marbletown, and Woodstock
in Ulster County and Rhinebeck
in Dutchess County.
While the city's request has
been winding its way through the regulatory
pipeline for a number of years, the governor's office has given no indication regarding his intentions
in terms of whether or not, as one of eight Great Lake states governors with veto power over the
proposal, he will vote to approve the unprecedented water diversion.
In an statement via email, New York State Thruway Authority spokesman Dan Weiller said, «There
is no
pipeline proposal before the Thruway Authority at this time and any decision to proceed with a project would require a thorough analysis by Thruway, compliance with all applicable laws and regulations, and approval by the board of directors.
Instead, NIH and NSF recovery dollars will go overwhelmingly for 2 - year extramural research grants, mostly for
proposals already submitted by people «established enough to already
be in the [funding agency]
pipeline,» says labor market economist Paula Stephan of Georgia State University
in Atlanta.
Although there
were other grant
proposals in the
pipeline, none of them had yet
been awarded and people
were starting to get nervous — nervous enough to consider picking up the whole operation and moving to the other side of the state
in search of money.
Proposals have
been put forward to set up the
pipeline so that the downward flow of the water goes through a hydroelectric plant that would
in turn power a desalination plant, providing up to 850 million m3 of fresh water per year to the parched region.
CPRIT spokesperson Ellen Read said that agency staff members
are seeking «clarification» on what the moratorium means for
proposals already
in the
pipeline.
The
proposal is the latest
in a series of planned
pipelines and expansion projects as a flood of crude from the oil sands and the Bakken shale oil field stretches existing networks.
Malloy
is so incredibly committed to the privatization of Connecticut's public schools that he even added funding for two more charter schools despite the fact that there
are no additional, approved charter school
proposals even
in the
pipeline.
Michael Levi (and others) argue that the tar sands oil will
be developed regardless of what the U.S. decides on Keystone XL — if we don't use, it someone else will — but this overlook the very serious opposition to other
pipeline proposals in Canada.
U.S. permits for multiple proposed Canadian tar sands
pipelines should
be considered
in light of an overall climate change strategy, rather than the current practice of considering each energy infrastructure
proposal on a project - by - project basis.
«With a renewed focus on climate change
in the U.S., and as a decision approaches on the high - profile Keystone XL
pipeline proposal, Canada's track record on greenhouse gas pollution
is under the microscope.
B.C. premier Christy Clark
is speaking out about the powerful, foreign interests that
are using their wealth to interfere
in the federal hearings into the Northern Gateway
pipeline proposal.
And if Canadian Big Oil giant Enbridge and its allies
in Canada's Federal Government have their way, and the massive Northern Gateway
pipeline / tanker route
proposal is approved, the whales may leave this place forever.
The Keystone XL
pipeline proposal was dealt yet another blow this week when the world's most influential newspaper decried the project as dangerous and not
in keeping with U.S. President Barack Obama's commitment to doing whatever he can to limit the impacts of climate change.
In 2011, in his role as chair of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, Kerry promised a careful review of the pipeline proposal but didn't say he was opposed: «There's a lot at stake here and I'll do my best to leave no question unanswered including every possible economic and environmental consideration before a final decision is made.&raqu
In 2011,
in his role as chair of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, Kerry promised a careful review of the pipeline proposal but didn't say he was opposed: «There's a lot at stake here and I'll do my best to leave no question unanswered including every possible economic and environmental consideration before a final decision is made.&raqu
in his role as chair of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, Kerry promised a careful review of the
pipeline proposal but didn't say he
was opposed: «There
's a lot at stake here and I'll do my best to leave no question unanswered including every possible economic and environmental consideration before a final decision
is made.»
The email said: «We have two very significantly - scaled wind farm
proposals in the
pipeline for Clashindarroch... they
are probably below the radar for most at the moment.
After gutting most of Canada's federal environmental legislation to expedite tar sands development and
pipeline proposals at the behest of the oil industry, now the federal government
is making it more difficult, and
in some cases impossible, for members of the public to participate
in the National Energy Board's (NEB) review of Enbridge's
proposal to reverse its Line 9
pipeline through southern Ontario and Quebec.
Under the new rules, which the NEB put
in place at the direction of the federal government
in response to overwhelming opposition from the public during the NEB's review of the Northern Gateway
pipeline, Ontario residents who live along the 639 - kilometre
pipeline route and want to submit public comments about their concerns —
are you ready for it — fill out a long and complex application to ask permissionfrom the NEB, Canada's
pipeline regulator, before they can even submit a letter to the NEB on the Line 9
pipeline proposal.
Meanwhile, yet another
pipeline company has put on the table yet another
pipeline proposal to get Alberta's dirty and dangerous — just ask the people
in Marshall, Michigan and Mayflower, Arkansas — crude to the ocean so it can
be shipped overseas
in supertankers.
Under the new rules, which the NEB put
in place at the direction of the federal government
in response to overwhelming opposition from the public during the NEB's review of the Northern Gateway
pipeline, Ontario residents who live along the 639 - kilometre
pipeline route and want to submit public comments about their concerns —
are you ready for it — fill out a long and complex application to ask permission from the NEB, Canada's
pipeline regulator, before they can even submit a letter to the NEB on the Line 9
pipeline proposal.
One intriguing large - scale hydrogen economy idea
is an ambitious
proposal for a gas
pipeline across NE Asia, to
be fed with hydrogen gas (plus some methane) produced by power from wind and geothermal energy sources, and
in particular the large wind energy potential that exists along the Aleutian Islands and Kamchatka Peninsula.
But the truth
is that the Government of British Columbia, strangely, doesn't have much of a say
in either approving or disapproving the
pipeline proposals.
In a major victory for the environmental movement, the Obama administration has announced that the State Dept will
be re-reviewing the
proposal and considering alternate routes for the controversial
pipeline.
In April when the State Department released a draft of its environmental assessment of the Keystone XL
proposal that suggested much more oil will
be shipped by rail without the
pipeline, I wrote:
In this commentary — featured on www.midhudsonnews.com in April of 2016 — Scenic Hudson President Ned Sullivan reviews pending proposals to construct petroleum pipelines through the Hudson Valley and explains why valley communities are rallying in oppositio
In this commentary — featured on www.midhudsonnews.com
in April of 2016 — Scenic Hudson President Ned Sullivan reviews pending proposals to construct petroleum pipelines through the Hudson Valley and explains why valley communities are rallying in oppositio
in April of 2016 — Scenic Hudson President Ned Sullivan reviews pending
proposals to construct petroleum
pipelines through the Hudson Valley and explains why valley communities
are rallying
in oppositio
in opposition.
Kinder Morgan would like us to believe that their Trans Mountain
pipeline project
in British Columbia
is a better
proposal than the one Enbridge has put forward, and that they
're a more responsible company.
It seems more and more like the Enbridge
pipeline proposal is dead
in the water.
The company plans to file its official application to the National Energy Board for its new
pipeline project — which
is equal
in size to the Enbridge
proposal —
in late 2013.
Whistleblowers
in the federal government revealed that they
were pressured «to give cabinet a legally - sound basis to say «yes»» to the
pipeline and tanker
proposal,» one month before the
pipeline was actually approved.
Included
in this report
is a recently released evaluation by Dr. Thomas Gunton and Sean Broadbent, who evaluated the Kinder Morgan's spill risk assessment method
in 2013, concluding that the expansion
proposal has a 99 per cent risk of
pipeline and tanker spills, when it
is examine using standard methodology.
Since the recent federal election there has
been much discussion (and as my colleague Eugene Kung notes, an abundance of open letters) about the Liberal party's election promise to «review Canada's environmental assessment (EA) processes and introduce new, fair processes» for reviewing projects (or re-reviewing them, as
in the case of major
proposals like the controversial Kinder Morgan and Energy East oil sands
pipeline and tankers projects).
There
are many high - profile, contested
proposals nationwide, including the Enbridge «Northern Gateway»
pipeline that would carry Alberta oil across northern British Columbia en route to Asia, and the controversial «Ring of Fire» mineral discovery, located on or near the traditional lands of several First Nations
in Northern Ontario.
Cradle Through College Coalition, of which Committee for Children
is a member, sent letters to House and Senate leadership
in response to their respective budget
proposals urging them to make stronger investments
in high - quality early learning, K — 12 education, pathways for postsecondary education, stability for vulnerable students, and building a strong
pipeline of education from early childhood to early adulthood.