Sentences with phrase «proposals mean in practice»

Not exact matches

Mike Petrilli talks with Hill and Jochim about this proposal, what it would mean for policy and practice at the federal, state, and local levels, and the prospects for its adoption in this edition of The Education Next Book Club.

When I think back over my years in education reform, one constant is frustration that so many lofty, well - meaning proposals have disappointed in practice.

For example, best practices in environmental assessment means considering alternatives to the project, including the «no» alternative, with alternatives not necessarily limited to proposals within the jurisdiction of a particular regulator.

In practice, this means that boards in the U.S., and potentially in Canada and other jurisdictions in the future, should be prepared to allocate sufficient time to review, analyze and prepare a response to shareholder proposals, all while meeting the time constraints for submitting no - action requestIn practice, this means that boards in the U.S., and potentially in Canada and other jurisdictions in the future, should be prepared to allocate sufficient time to review, analyze and prepare a response to shareholder proposals, all while meeting the time constraints for submitting no - action requestin the U.S., and potentially in Canada and other jurisdictions in the future, should be prepared to allocate sufficient time to review, analyze and prepare a response to shareholder proposals, all while meeting the time constraints for submitting no - action requestin Canada and other jurisdictions in the future, should be prepared to allocate sufficient time to review, analyze and prepare a response to shareholder proposals, all while meeting the time constraints for submitting no - action requestin the future, should be prepared to allocate sufficient time to review, analyze and prepare a response to shareholder proposals, all while meeting the time constraints for submitting no - action requests.

First, its use of the term «radical» (for which the Critique offers no citation): The relevant discussion in the article refers to two explicitly «experimental» proposals included at the end of the article, in a section titled «Thinking Outside of the Box...» The introduction to that part of the discussion states «I call this a «thought experiment» because I am well aware that the practical realities of child protection practice may mean that it would not work...» Later the text notes that one proposal is «less radical» than the other.