In September, I reported on the Rule 23 Miniconference that I attended in Dallas to discuss
the proposed changes being considered by the Rule 23 Subcommittee to the Advisory Committee on Civil Rules.
Not exact matches
Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those reflected in such forward - looking statements and that should
be considered in evaluating our outlook include, but
are not limited to, the following: 1) our ability to continue to grow our business and execute our growth strategy, including the timing, execution, and profitability of new and maturing programs; 2) our ability to perform our obligations under our new and maturing commercial, business aircraft, and military development programs, and the related recurring production; 3) our ability to accurately estimate and manage performance, cost, and revenue under our contracts, including our ability to achieve certain cost reductions with respect to the B787 program; 4) margin pressures and the potential for additional forward losses on new and maturing programs; 5) our ability to accommodate, and the cost of accommodating, announced increases in the build rates of certain aircraft; 6) the effect on aircraft demand and build rates of
changing customer preferences for business aircraft, including the effect of global economic conditions on the business aircraft market and expanding conflicts or political unrest in the Middle East or Asia; 7) customer cancellations or deferrals as a result of global economic uncertainty or otherwise; 8) the effect of economic conditions in the industries and markets in which we operate in the U.S. and globally and any
changes therein, including fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates; 9) the success and timely execution of key milestones such as the receipt of necessary regulatory approvals, including our ability to obtain in a timely fashion any required regulatory or other third party approvals for the consummation of our announced acquisition of Asco, and customer adherence to their announced schedules; 10) our ability to successfully negotiate, or re-negotiate, future pricing under our supply agreements with Boeing and our other customers; 11) our ability to enter into profitable supply arrangements with additional customers; 12) the ability of all parties to satisfy their performance requirements under existing supply contracts with our two major customers, Boeing and Airbus, and other customers, and the risk of nonpayment by such customers; 13) any adverse impact on Boeing's and Airbus» production of aircraft resulting from cancellations, deferrals, or reduced orders by their customers or from labor disputes, domestic or international hostilities, or acts of terrorism; 14) any adverse impact on the demand for air travel or our operations from the outbreak of diseases or epidemic or pandemic outbreaks; 15) our ability to avoid or recover from cyber-based or other security attacks, information technology failures, or other disruptions; 16) returns on pension plan assets and the impact of future discount rate
changes on pension obligations; 17) our ability to borrow additional funds or refinance debt, including our ability to obtain the debt to finance the purchase price for our announced acquisition of Asco on favorable terms or at all; 18) competition from commercial aerospace original equipment manufacturers and other aerostructures suppliers; 19) the effect of governmental laws, such as U.S. export control laws and U.S. and foreign anti-bribery laws such as the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and the United Kingdom Bribery Act, and environmental laws and agency regulations, both in the U.S. and abroad; 20) the effect of
changes in tax law, such as the effect of The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the «TCJA») that
was enacted on December 22, 2017, and
changes to the interpretations of or guidance related thereto, and the Company's ability to accurately calculate and estimate the effect of such
changes; 21) any reduction in our credit ratings; 22) our dependence on our suppliers, as well as the cost and availability of raw materials and purchased components; 23) our ability to recruit and retain a critical mass of highly - skilled employees and our relationships with the unions representing many of our employees; 24) spending by the U.S. and other governments on defense; 25) the possibility that our cash flows and our credit facility may not
be adequate for our additional capital needs or for payment of interest on, and principal of, our indebtedness; 26) our exposure under our revolving credit facility to higher interest payments should interest rates increase substantially; 27) the effectiveness of any interest rate hedging programs; 28) the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting; 29) the outcome or impact of ongoing or future litigation, claims, and regulatory actions; 30) exposure to potential product liability and warranty claims; 31) our ability to effectively assess, manage and integrate acquisitions that we pursue, including our ability to successfully integrate the Asco business and generate synergies and other cost savings; 32) our ability to consummate our announced acquisition of Asco in a timely matter while avoiding any unexpected costs, charges, expenses, adverse
changes to business relationships and other business disruptions for ourselves and Asco as a result of the acquisition; 33) our ability to continue selling certain receivables through our supplier financing program; 34) the risks of doing business internationally, including fluctuations in foreign current exchange rates, impositions of tariffs or embargoes, compliance with foreign laws, and domestic and foreign government policies; and 35) our ability to complete the
proposed accelerated stock repurchase plan, among other things.
The FDA
is still weighing its own
proposed changes to Nutrition Facts labeling now, and says the agency will
consider the new guidelines.
-LSB-...] the mental
change [CiV]
proposes is no longer to
consider persons and the world as something we have produced, but to look upon them from the viewpoint of their vocation.
All of us involved in youth sports - from parents, to coaches, from athletic trainers to school athletic directors to the athletes themselves - have a responsibility to do what we can to make contact and collision sports safer, whether it by reducing the number of hits to the head a player receives over the course of a season (such as N.F.L. and the Ivy League
are doing in limiting full - contact practices, and the Sports Legacy Institute recently
proposed be considered at the youth and high school level in its Hit Count program), teaching football players how to tackle without using their head (as former pro football player Bobby Hosea has long advocated),
changing the rules (as the governing body for high school hockey in Minnesota did in the aftermath of the Jack Jablonski injury or USA Hockey did in banning body checks at the Pee Wee level), or giving serious consideration to whether athletes below a certain age should
be playing tackle football at all (as the American Academy of Pediatrics recommend).
Under the
proposed changes fewer cases would come before the court, as those «identical in substance to a claim that has
been considered by a national court» would no longer
be eligible - unless the national court had failed to interpret the convention correctly.
After
considering all options and
proposing any
changes deemed necessary by the Legislature, the budget will
be adopted in December.
Cuomo
is proposing legislation to make a series of
changes, including allowing judges to
consider whether a defendant poses a risk to the community when they set bail.
The self - serving nature of those opposed to
change becomes even more insidious if one
considers that some of our lordships may
be in danger of losing their present position of privilege, whilst those in the lower chamber who still harbour aspirations towards preferment by some future prime minister, could have their hopes of elevation dashed by the
changes currently
being proposed.
The group's Daniel McKay says
proposed hydrofracking now
being considered by the Cuomo Administration's environmental department could
change the rural and historic character of the region.
Just to agree quickly with Pete Whitehead that Electoral Calculus
is a waste of space, and that these figures provide a good start to
consider the electoral implications of the
proposed boundary
changes.
The New York State Law Revision Commission
is tasked by Section 72 of the Legislative Law with examining and
considering proposed changes in the law, recommending such
changes in the law as it deems necessary, and reporting its proceedings annually to the Legislature with
proposed bills to carry out any of its recommendations.
The new
proposed model could allow a better quantification of the impacts that will likely occur under
changing climate and could
be considered in future ocean resources and land use management.
Normally I
propose a step - by step process for making a dietary
change, but
considering where commercial milk has come from, and what it has
been through, it
is best to just remove it from the diet altogether.
The Global Achievement Gap, a new book by Tony Wagner, co-director of the
Change Leadership Group, examines the U.S. education system in the 21st century,
considers why American students
are falling behind their international peers, and
proposes methods to begin to correct the downward slide.
I recently submitted public comments on the
proposed SNS regulation, which emphasized the importance of
considering how
proposed changes would affect spending decisions and, ultimately, students, as opposed to simply calculating how many dollars would
be transferred from one school to another.
School leaders need to think carefully about any
changes they
are proposing and
consider, as part of their assessments, the impact they will have on workload and teacher morale.
This new Partnership Forum would
be able to
propose changes to a draft remit for pay and conditions and set the agenda for any other issues that needed to
be considered.
There
is no feedback loop and no process to
consider and implement
proposed changes.
The
changes — some
proposed and some already in effect —
are also taking place as states
consider the status of their waivers from certain portions of the No Child Left Behind Act.
A hearing just on
proposed changes to the LCAP itself
was held July 22, and the state board
is expected to
consider the LCFF final regulations in September.
Notable
changes proposed by this standard include modifications to what
is considered for the Tow Vehicle Trailering Weight; the J2807 tow vehicle weight rating includes a driver, a passenger, and optional equipment purchased by at least one - third of the truck's customers, and a higher tow vehicle weight automatically lowers the maximum trailer weight rating number.
We
are also
proposing two unitholder meetings to, initially
change the responsible entity of the fund, and then to
consider converting the fund into a closed - ended vehicle and listing it on the Australian Stock Exchange (ASX).
The next step
is for the NCRB to very carefully
consider the requested rates before laughing maniacally while denying nearly every rate
change ever
proposed.
Don't include a copy of the actual notice (that
's their problem to sort out), just tell them exactly what part of the
proposed changes to your account that you do not agree with under any circumstances, and if you do subsequently receive a bill which implements the
changes, it will
be considered unlawful, outside the scope of the actual cardmember agreement, and subject to billing dispute and / or other legal action.
Considering the
proposed changes to
change the GSEs» credit reporting standards, do you think that there
's anything particularly unfair about those
proposed changes, or
is there a way that you can see to
change those credit score requirements in an equitable way?
No, it
's not, since it doesn't
propose that the
change being considered has any pretensions to permanent sustainability.
U.S. permits for multiple
proposed Canadian tar sands pipelines should
be considered in light of an overall climate
change strategy, rather than the current practice of
considering each energy infrastructure proposal on a project - by - project basis.
California, Oregon, Washington and other states across the nation
are forcing utilities to
consider the additional cost of curbing carbon dioxide emissions in
proposed coal - based generation, due to increasing pressure to address climate
change.
On the first sentence stating that the WGI report
considers evidence of past and future climate
change based on many independent scientific analyses from observations of the climate system, paleoclimate archives, theoretical studies of climate processes, and simulations using climate models, Saudi Arabia
proposed clarifying that evidence of future climate
change is based on models and simulations only.
Would you
consider adding a chapter addressing the likely efficacy of various policies that have
been proposed to prevent / reduce sea level rise caused by man made climate
change?
WHEREAS, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) intends to
propose federal regulations to govern the disposal of coal combustion byproducts (CCB) under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA); WHEREAS, the EPA
is considering changing the current regulatory status of CCBs from a non-hazardous waste under the...
But the science isn't settled — a significant point
considering the aforementioned economic costs of many
proposed climate
change «solutions.»
Cap and trade may seem like the big offer on the emission reductions table at the moment — one mention of alternatives like a straight carbon tax send many people (the average American in particular) into apoplectic fits — but Annie «The Story of Stuff» Leonard wants you to take a closer look.There
are so many troubling details in how cap and trade
is currently
proposed — free permit giveaways to polluters, massive potential for bogus offsetting projects, the ever - present potential of distracting us from making real
changes — that we really need to
consider other options.
At public hearings on the environmental impacts of
proposed oil pipelines, Canadians
are no longer allowed to discuss climate
change: any testimonials concerning how the oil
was produced («upstream effects») and what will happen when it
is burned («downstream effects»)
are considered inadmissible.
In October, a coalition of environmental groups met with the White House Office of Management and Budget and DOI officials and urged them to
consider the government's own research before finalizing the rule, warning that the
proposed change was «inappropriate, unwise and illegal» (PDF).
But the
proposed changes call attention to the fact that you'll want to
be careful when using these sites to
be certain that the comments you and others make on your site do not contain information about you «the lawyer» or your «lawyer services» that could
be considered false and / or misleading — even if that means deleting an overly flattering testimonial that could deceive potential clients.
As such, Canadian electrical industry participants
are well advised to
consider if these
proposed US developments will result in similar
changes to the applicable critical infrastructure standards in Canada.
If this
proposed change is adopted, provincial regulators will have to
consider whether to similarly amend their rules of professional conduct.
The likely impact of the
proposed move on the noncustodial parent's relationship with the children
is a relevant factor in determining whether the move would cause detriment to the children and, when
considered in light of all of the relevant factors, may
be sufficient to justify a
change in custody.
The only faint hope one might have that the Harper government would
consider changes of the sort Mayrand
proposes to the Act
is a deeply concerned and aroused Canadian public.
At its meeting on April 12 - 13, 2012, [40] the [Commission] decided not to
propose changes to the ABA policy prohibiting nonlawyer ownership of law firms... The Commission
considered the pros and cons, including thoughtful comments that the
changes recommended in the [December 2, 2011 paper]
were both too modest and too expansive, and concluded that the case had not
been made for proceeding with even a form of nonlawyer ownership that
is more limited than the D.C. model.
It should
be noted that the requirement for providers to register with Ofsted
was considered by some to
be an unnecessary burden and a barrier to making the most of these
changes, so the
proposed removal of this requirement
is likely to
be welcomed and encourage more local authorities to
consider different ways of delivering children's social care.
[13] He
considered (1) the existing shared parenting arrangement and the relationship between the children and Ms. G; (2) the existing shared parenting arrangement and the relationship between the children and Mr.
S; (3) the desirability of maximizing contact between the children and both parents; (4) the views of the children, which had not
been canvassed; (5) Ms. G'
s reason for moving; (6) the disruption to the children of a
change in custody; (7) the disruption to the children consequent on removal from family, schools, and community; and (8) various other factors, such as Mr.
S'
s economic stability, the importance of the paternal grandparents, the location of the
proposed residence at Moyie Lake on a leased lot at an RV park, the girls» relationship with Mr. G and his children, and Ms. G'
s inflexibility.
Mark Michels, After
considering public input, significant
changes are proposed to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure amendments, Law Technology News (April 3, 2014).
What if ethics committees
were required to
consider the impact of
proposed rule
changes on access to justice for those of middle and low socioeconomic status?
(6) On the recommendation of the Minister, the Lieutenant Governor in Council may make regulations prescribing matters to
be considered when determining whether a
proposed change to the funding and delivery of services for the prevention of workplace injuries and occupational diseases would
be a significant
change.
The next step
is for the NCRB to very carefully
consider the requested rates before laughing maniacally while denying nearly every rate
change ever
proposed.
It anticipates that these can include providing «adequate time and resources» to facilitate engagement with the most appropriate community representatives;
considering whether stakeholders might
be resistant to the
proposed changes and how such resistance will
be «overcome»; and how expectations will
be managed so they
are not raised unrealistically high.9
For other cases holding that
proposed relocation requests which would result in the effective termination of a shared physical custodial arrangement should
be treated as a modification of custody, see, e.g., Lewellyn v. Lewellyn, 351 Ark. 346, 93 S.W. 3d 681 (2002)(both mother and father petitioned for sole custody of children after mother's
proposed relocation would make parties» shared physical custodial arrangement unworkable; court found that mother's relocation constituted material
change of circumstances warranting award of sole custody to father, even though such a relocation would not
be considered a material
change in circumstances in a case that did not involve shared physical custody), and In
re Marriage of Garst, 955 P. 2d 1056 (Colo..