Sentences with phrase «proposed custody arrangements»

Many states require parenting classes for divorcing parents and when spouses dispute proposed custody arrangements, some states may also require the parents to attend mediation.

Petition for Dissolution of Marriage states that the marriage is irretrievably broken and there is no reasonable likelihood it can be preserved; the date and location of the marriage; the date the spouses separated; where they live and work; whether there are minor children and where they reside, and the proposed custody arrangements.

Prior to mediation Attorney Winner will thoroughly review the financial issues, proposed custody arrangements, and other matters pertinent to a case to educate his clients in regard to what is in their best interests, and what they can expect in mediation.

When two recently orphaned brothers (Aaron Johnson and Jasper Harris) flee to Venice rather than accept their proposed custody arrangements, they join a band of pick - pocketing street kids who are led by a mysterious masked teen called The Thief Lord (Rollo Weeks).

In Montana, both parents must submit a proposed parenting plan to the court, which explains their proposed custody arrangement.

Virginia has adopted the best interests of the child standard, in which a judge examines how a proposed custody arrangement will affect a child's well - being.

Parents must also determine a proposed custody arrangement, submitting the proposed schedule to the court.

You might also dispute a proposed custody arrangement or matters related to child support.

In child custody proceedings in Ohio, parents must demonstrate their proposed custody arrangement is in their child's...

In child custody proceedings in Ohio, parents must demonstrate their proposed custody arrangement is in their child's best interests.

Not exact matches

A court in Oklahoma will either adopt the proposed joint custody arrangement detailed in the parenting plan or modify or reject the proposed joint custody arrangement.

(1) the temperament and developmental needs of the child; (2) the capacity and the disposition of the parents to understand and meet the needs of the child; (3) the preferences of each child; (4) the wishes of the parents as to custody; (5) the past and current interaction and relationship of the child with each parent, the child's siblings, and any other person, including a grandparent, who may significantly affect the best interest of the child; (6) the actions of each parent to encourage the continuing parent child relationship between the child and the other parent, as is appropriate, including compliance with court orders; (7) the manipulation by or coercive behavior of the parents in an effort to involve the child in the parents» dispute; (8) any effort by one parent to disparage the other parent in front of the child; (9) the ability of each parent to be actively involved in the life of the child; (10) the child's adjustment to his or her home, school, and community environments; (11) the stability of the child's existing and proposed residences; (12) the mental and physical health of all individuals involved, except that a disability of a proposed custodial parent or other party, in and of itself, must not be determinative of custody unless the proposed custodial arrangement is not in the best interest of the child; (13) the child's cultural and spiritual background; (14) whether the child or a sibling of the child has been abused or neglected; (15) whether one parent has perpetrated domestic violence or child abuse or the effect on the child of the actions of an abuser if any domestic violence has occurred between the parents or between a parent and another individual or between the parent and the child; (16) whether one parent has relocated more than one hundred miles from the child's primary residence in the past year, unless the parent relocated for safety reasons; and (17) other factors as the court considers necessary.

Individuals seeking court ordered changes to existing Child Custody Arrangements will be required to file custody modification forms that specify details of the reasons for the request and the proposed soCustody Arrangements will be required to file custody modification forms that specify details of the reasons for the request and the proposed socustody modification forms that specify details of the reasons for the request and the proposed solution.

Under the new version of the best interest test, a judge needs to ask all of the following questions about proposed parenting time and custody arrangements:

[13] He considered (1) the existing shared parenting arrangement and the relationship between the children and Ms. G; (2) the existing shared parenting arrangement and the relationship between the children and Mr. S; (3) the desirability of maximizing contact between the children and both parents; (4) the views of the children, which had not been canvassed; (5) Ms. G's reason for moving; (6) the disruption to the children of a change in custody; (7) the disruption to the children consequent on removal from family, schools, and community; and (8) various other factors, such as Mr. S's economic stability, the importance of the paternal grandparents, the location of the proposed residence at Moyie Lake on a leased lot at an RV park, the girls» relationship with Mr. G and his children, and Ms. G's inflexibility.

Particularly in a joint custody or shared residency arrangement that has been found to be in the child's best interests, the reasons for one parent to want to move, effectively ending what has already been found to be in the child's best interests, would be very relevant to determining whether the child's needs can be met in this proposed new arrangement.

Your proposed parenting plan will indicate what type of custody arrangement you desire, and if and why your spouse's contact with your child should be limited.

In some cases, the court may require parents to bring a proposed parenting plan to the temporary hearing to assist the judge with deciding the temporary custody arrangement.

If you are the non-custodial parent or the parent that does not have physical custody, you will need to present the courts your proposed visitation arrangement in hopes to get approval.

The court can grant joint custody for both or just one of these types if the parents have proposed it beforehand and the court approves or the court finds this arrangement promotes the best interest of the child.

If you and your spouse can not agree to the parenting schedule, you may submit a proposed parenting plan to have the court determine the custody arrangement.

This article will examine recent decisions concerning the relocation of the custodial parent in sole or primary physical custody arrangements as well as the proposed relocation of a parent in cases involving a joint custodial arrangement, including both joint legal custody and joint physical custody.

Since courts typically defer to the parents» proposed custody and visitation arrangements, parents may benefit from making an effort to reach agreement before asking the judge to create a custody and visitation plan.

On the last page, under Section II — your requested «relief» — check the second box, asking the court to approve your proposed parenting plan for a custody arrangement.

For other cases holding that proposed relocation requests which would result in the effective termination of a shared physical custodial arrangement should be treated as a modification of custody, see, e.g., Lewellyn v. Lewellyn, 351 Ark. 346, 93 S.W. 3d 681 (2002)(both mother and father petitioned for sole custody of children after mother's proposed relocation would make parties» shared physical custodial arrangement unworkable; court found that mother's relocation constituted material change of circumstances warranting award of sole custody to father, even though such a relocation would not be considered a material change in circumstances in a case that did not involve shared physical custody), and In re Marriage of Garst, 955 P. 2d 1056 (Colo..

For a parent wishing to establish or modify custody in Baltimore, Maryland, the first step involves communicating to the court the specific reasons for the proposed arrangement.

A court in Oklahoma will either adopt the proposed joint custody arrangement detailed in the parenting plan or modify or reject the proposed joint custody arrangement.

These factors are: (1) the potential advantages of the proposed move and likelihood the relocation will substantially improve the life of the custodial parent and child as well as whether the move is the result of a momentary whim by the custodial parent; (2) the integrity of both parents» motives - for the move and opposing the move; and (3) whether there are alternative custody or visitation arrangements that can be made that will foster an ongoing relationship between the child and noncustodial parent.

In contemplating a proposed joint custody order, the best interests of the child standard obliges the court to ensure that the parents have assessed all components of their joint agreement, * 803 that they are committed to making it work, that their proposal fully addresses the many contingencies, and that there is no reason to believe that the child's interests will not be served by the arrangement.

(1) the temperament and developmental needs of the child; (2) the capacity and the disposition of the parents to understand and meet the needs of the child; (3) the preferences of each child; (4) the wishes of the parents as to custody; (5) the past and current interaction and relationship of the child with each parent, the child's siblings, and any other person, including a grandparent, who may significantly affect the best interest of the child; (6) the actions of each parent to encourage the continuing parent child relationship between the child and the other parent, as is appropriate, including compliance with court orders; (7) the manipulation by or coercive behavior of the parents in an effort to involve the child in the parents» dispute; (8) any effort by one parent to disparage the other parent in front of the child; (9) the ability of each parent to be actively involved in the life of the child; (10) the child's adjustment to his or her home, school, and community environments; (11) the stability of the child's existing and proposed residences; (12) the mental and physical health of all individuals involved, except that a disability of a proposed custodial parent or other party, in and of itself, must not be determinative of custody unless the proposed custodial arrangement is not in the best interest of the child; (13) the child's cultural and spiritual background; (14) whether the child or a sibling of the child has been abused or neglected; (15) whether one parent has perpetrated domestic violence or child abuse or the effect on the child of the actions of an abuser if any domestic violence has occurred between the parents or between a parent and another individual or between the parent and the child; (16) whether one parent has relocated more than one hundred miles from the child's primary residence in the past year, unless the parent relocated for safety reasons; and (17) other factors as the court considers necessary

The proposed new child custody and visitation arrangement should preserve the child's well - being, promote a healthy home environment and encourage continued involvement by both parents.

A judge will base the decision on the circumstances surrounding the proposed move, such as the custody arrangement, parent - child relationships and effect the move is likely to have on the child.

The proposed time - sharing changes could potentially upend the state's current policy of putting the needs of children first in favor of parents» wishes when judges determine custody arrangements, Scott wrote in Friday's veto letter.