Not exact matches
The Trump administration already has relied on the House bill's healthcare
spending cuts in its
proposed federal budget.
In the United States, the
federal government has traditionally underwritten investment in early stage energy technology, but the White House has
proposed cutting that
spending.
We applaud Governor Paterson's argument that, should New York receive a significant cash infusion from the
federal government for Fiscal 2010, the state should use those revenues to
cut back on significant
proposed tax and fee hikes, rather than restore or increase governmental
spending.
BY DUNCAN OSBORNE While Mayor Bill de Blasio is
proposing to increase
spending by roughly $ 2 billion in the city fiscal year that begins on July 1,
cuts in
federal and state support for the city may force the mayor to curtail those plans.
State lawmakers and the governor are discussing whether to
spend billions of dollars on water quality upgrades and projects and Cuomo, too, has decried the
proposed federal budget
cuts as having a negative impact on New York.
Gov. Andrew Cuomo, under the guise of bracing for the impact of
federal cuts to health care
spending,
proposes a 14 percent tax on New York health insurers in his 2018 - 19 budget.
Representative Harold Rogers (R - KY), chair of the House Appropriations Committee, is
proposing deep budget
cuts in some agencies as part of an overall Republican plan to trim
federal spending.
(A Senate panel approved a bill that would erase this year's sequester
cut and give the agency $ 30.95 billion in 2014, but the House of Representatives, which has not released its version of the bill, has
proposed cuts to the overall
federal spending that could translate into another $ 5 billion
cut for NIH, according to an analysis by the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.)
While NASA's $ 200 million funding reduction pales in comparison to
cuts that would face some
federal agencies under the
proposed budget (which has to be reviewed and approved by Congress before becoming official), it would make significant changes to how those dollars are
spent.
It is no surprise, then, that every Democratic candidate for the presidency in 2008 has called for increased
federal spending on education, and that no Republican candidate (with the exception of libertarian Ron Paul) has
proposed a
spending cut.
The
proposed spending reductions represent the deepest
cuts to
federal juvenile justice funding in more than a decade.
As Education Week's Andrew Ujifusa recently observed, the
proposed 2017 - 2018
cuts represent the largest
proposed reduction to
federal education
spending «since President Ronald Reagan sought a 35.7 percent
cut to the department in his
proposed 1983 budget.»
Both chambers of Congress have passed
spending blueprints to guide the
federal government's
spending for FY 2016 and beyond — and both chambers
propose severe
cuts to education funding.
Yet, educational achievement barriers — compounded by the Trump administration's rescinding of DACA and drastic
proposed cuts to
federal education
spending — will continue to keep Latinxs teachers out of the classroom.
If the science of climate change really is «established», as popular media insist, what's wrong with
cutting federal spending on climate research, as President Donald Trump's budget
proposes to do?