Sentences with phrase «proposed global warming solutions»

Not exact matches

He acknowledges that human activity accelerated global warming and proposes an «all of the above energy solution» called The Lexington Project to stem it.

All of the proposed solutions for global warming involve lots of central control, failed economic policies and enforced poverty for everyone but the elite who are advocating the policies.

Anyway it is a false comparison to compare old temperatures with new temperatures when asking «wht should we do» you need to compare «our solution» with «their solution» If you are advocating a political strategy you need to accept current proposed strategies will probably still result in the majority of the global warming predicted in the ordinary scenario (if not all of it — a point which I can argue if you like).

Drawdown: The Most Comprehensive Plan Ever Proposed to Reverse Global Warming maps, measures, models, and describes the 100 most substantive solutions to global waGlobal Warming maps, measures, models, and describes the 100 most substantive solutions to global wWarming maps, measures, models, and describes the 100 most substantive solutions to global waglobal warmingwarming.

Nurses article paints conservatives with quite a broad brush and fails to recognize that there are other approaches to «addressing» global warming than the anti-industrial «solutions» which advocates like himself propose.

My wife (who always wants to know everything better than me, despite the fact that she has no technical or scientific training at all) has proposed an even simpler solution: simply move all the thermometers inside urban areas or near airport runways out to the countryside — this should result in about the same reduction of global warming.

Several of the scientists I spoke with proposed global warming as the solution to Fermi's famous paradox, which asks, If the universe is so big, then why haven't we encountered any other intelligent life in it?

There have been NO «chosen solutions» proposed so far that would result in any perceptible reduction of global warming by 2100.

Local sourcing is proposed by our universities as the solution for saving the rain forests, reducing pollution, and halting global warming.

Geoengineering solution to global warming could destroy the ozone layer (04/24/2008) A proposed plan to fight global warming by injecting sulfate particles into Earth's upper atmosphere could damage the ozone layer over the Arctic and Antarctic, report researchers writing in the journal Science.

«[The research] demonstrates that proposed technological solutions, like CDR, to the problems of global warming and ocean acidification are no substitute for reducing carbon emissions, which remains the safest and most reliable path for avoiding dangerous climate change.»

Drawdown, a new compendium of climate - stabilization tools and solutions edited by the versatile Paul Hawken, has an impressive subtitle: «The Most Comprehensive Plan Ever Proposed to Reverse Global Warming.»

One potential solution to combat global warming that some scientists are proposing is spraying aerosols into the atmosphere to deflect the sun's rays, which is also known as Solar Radiation Management.

Whether it's global warming, cooling, the ozone hole, acid rain, or any of the other myriad climate doomsday predictions (which NEVER come true) the proposed «solution» is always the same: More money and more power for politicians, and higher taxes and less freedom for ordinary people.

The unproven «solutions» being proposed by global warming advocates would ultimately cost billions of dollars to implement and there's absolutely no scientific proof that these changes would have a material impact on the earth's climate.

Scientists have proposed these sunlight - reflecting solutions as last - ditch attempts to halt global warming.

Environmentalists are warning against expanding the production of biofuels, noting the proposed solution to global warming is actually causing more harm than it is designed to alleviate.

Some proposed «solutions» to global warming could be more damaging in the long run than the stated dangers.

You can see that by looking at the proposed solutions to the alleged problem of global warming / climate change / name du jour.

Darwall draws on history and science in order to expose the exaggerations of climate change and what he calls the «Global Warming Policy Paradox»; the assessment of whether proposed solutions are even effective.

Understanding the Earth's climate and the potential of global warming has stopped being a scientific curiosity to me and has become a serious topic because the solutions being proposed would be detrimental to my family's life.

But notice their proposed solutions are the same, no matter whether the «crisis» is overpopulation, the coming Ice Age, or global warming.

Although there is not universal agreement in the scientific community on the global warming and its anthropogenic causes, the political community seems to have accepted it and proposed solutions.

This is bound to ruffle a few feathers, so here are Professor Jacobson's comments on how he came to this conclusions: Jacobson Considered a Wide Range of Environmental Impacts Jacobson says he has conducted to first quantitative, scientific evaluation of the proposed, major, energy - related solutions by assessing not only their potential for delivering energy for electricity and vehicles, but also their impacts on global warming, human health, energy security, water supply, space requirements, wildlife, water pollution, reliability and sustainability.

«What we are doing in these tropical forests is really a massive problem,» said Kurz.Bruce McCarl, an agricultural economist at Texas A&M; University, argues that simple changes in forest management and agricultural practices could lower the risk of severe global warming much more rapidly than proposed technological solutions like carbon sequestration.

Jacobson has conducted the first quantitative, scientific evaluation of the proposed, major, energy - related solutions by assessing not only their potential for delivering energy for electricity and vehicles, but also their impacts on global warming, human health, energy security, water supply, space requirements, wildlife, water pollution, reliability and sustainability.

The issue of «what to do» about AGW is related to climate modeling (as you have to use models to predict what a certain change would do), but really, most of the proposed solutions to global warming are just terrible, inefficient, or contradictory.

Various technological solutions to global warming through geo - engineering have been proposed.

The proposed solution to combat such denialism and assumed ignorance is «climate justice,» even though over 30,000 scientists reject global warming alarmism.

Global warming alarmists such as Al Gore, United Nations climate boss Christiana Figueres, and senior Obama administration officials are showing their true colors, proposing «solutions» for fighting alleged man - made climate change that are increasingly outlandish and outright totalitarian.

The Obama administration and the proponents of «global governance» hope to push through their draconian plans before more Americans awaken to the fact that it is the proposed climate «solutions» we should fear, rather than the non-existent global warming «crisis.»