Sentences with phrase «proposed relocation»

After such scrutiny, in some cases the court will reject the parent's proposed relocation outright....

The court concluded that the mother's proposed relocation only reflected the interests of herself and her new husband and not those of the child.

Thus, in 2008 the government of Badung proposed the relocation of the Badung's capital and that proposal was approved by the Indonesian government.

The DOE proposed a relocation site on Monday, department officials said, noting that the charter elected instead to keep their students home.

RELOCATION AND CONTRACTION: As a last resort to combat monetary losses, the owners propose relocation and possibly contraction of the teams of the NBA.

For a plan that's intended to increase the tranquility of Chicago's lakefront, the proposed relocation of Lake Shore Drive west of Soldier Field got off to a turbulent start Wednesday.

The petition must include the address, telephone number and description of the new residence, the date of the intended move or proposed relocation, and a statement describing the reasons for the move.

The President of IMANI Ghana, Franklin Cudjoe, believes the proposed relocation as a solution to the tensions in Old Fadama will be misplaced given that the problems there are anchored in urbanization.

She said the East 127th Street location would be a «temporary» fix, that the proposed relocation would have little effect on residents and the site is «the best alternative.»

whether the proposed relocation is likely to enhance the general quality of life of the child and, if applicable, of the relocating guardian, including increasing emotional well - being or financial or educational opportunities

The Family Law Act offers similar exemptions in respect of presumptions that would otherwise require parenting time and parental responsibilities to be shared equally, that all parental responsibilities after the death of one guardian be vested in those which survive, and deem a proposed relocation to be in the best interests of a child once certain conditions are met.

To any relocation or proposed relocation, whether permanent or temporary, of a child during any proceeding pending on October 1, 2009, wherein the parenting plan, custody, primary residence, time - sharing, or access to the child is an issue.

The family court advised that these issues were best dealt with through the appointment of a parenting coordinator and that Mother should try to be accommodating to Father because her proposed relocation affected his parenting time.

This is also true if you are engaged in a dispute over paternity and fathers» rights, custody and parenting time, a proposed relocation involving your children, or a range of other crucial issues.

He found the proposed relocation of the girls from Medicine Hat to Moyie Lake would constitute a material change in circumstances, and proceeded to make a fresh inquiry into the best interests of the children.

~ A joint custody parent's reasons for a proposed relocation are relevant to the consideration of whether the move would be in the child's best interests.

Switzerland is another rising blockchain hub with cryptocurrency adoption widespread in cities like Zug, while the Prime Minister of Malta personally welcomed the proposed relocation of Binance HQ to their small island, while announcing his support for blockchain technology and calling on other EU leaders to join him «on the frontline in embracing this crucial innovation» and create the «Bitcoin continent of Europe».

Legitimate economic reasons arise when a proposed relocation conveys a financial benefit on, or causes the economic improvement of, the custodial parent and include employment and educational opportunities as well as the opportunities of the custodial parent's new spouse.

While the employment or educational opportunities of a custodial parent's new spouse may constitute legitimate economic reasons for a proposed relocation, the actual remarriage of the custodial parent and the decision to move to be with the new spouse are purely personal.

This article will examine recent decisions concerning the relocation of the custodial parent in sole or primary physical custody arrangements as well as the proposed relocation of a parent in cases involving a joint custodial arrangement, including both joint legal custody and joint physical custody.

Beyond 100 miles, however, the proposed relocation can have an impact on child and spousal support, legal and physical custody and property distribution because the courts recognize that the relocation fundamentally changes the relationship between the child and the noncustodial parent, particularly the costs of visitation.

If you choose to file a motion requesting the court to block the move, a hearing is held to consider whether or not the proposed relocation should be blocked by the court.

Of all the potential issues that can arise in child custody cases, one of the most difficult and complicated to resolve is whether to permit the proposed relocation of the custodial parent.

2002)(recognizing presumption in favor of custodial parent's right to relocate with child); Casey v. Casey, 58 P. 3d 763 (Okla. 2002)(fit custodial parent had statutory right to relocate with her children; husband failed to rebut her right by establishing any risk of harm to the children from the proposed relocation); and In re Marriage of Horner, 151 Wash. 2d 884, 93 P. 3d 124 (2004)(state statute created rebuttable presumption in favor of custodial parent's decision to move).

The trial court found that, although the mother's proposed relocation was not made in bad faith, the effect of the move would be detrimental to the welfare of the children because it would hinder frequent and continuing contact between the children and the father.

However, several jurisdictions also require that the custodial parent demonstrate a legitimate or good - faith motive for the proposed relocation in addition to showing that the move is in the child's best interests.

If the burden of proof established in paragraph IV is met, the burden shifts to the non-custodial parent to prove, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the proposed relocation is not in the best interest of the child.