So if the law is properly enforced we can expect to see a tidal wave of
prosecutions against bars, pubs, nightclubs, hostels, prisons and festivals.
Without proper legal counsel, you will have no line of defense
against zealous efforts by the
prosecution and law enforcement to put you behind
bars - even for a first shoplifting offense.
(correct test for Barrister appeals; whether outside the ex improviso rule, prosecutor may call evidence after
prosecution and defence case closed; use of debarring orders
against prosecutor; whether tribunal may «enter the arena» and strongly request the attendance of a
prosecution witness; whether BSB has power to summons witnesses; whether prosecutor may communicate with disciplinary judge behind the back of the defence; whether such communication redolent of actual bias of judge where judge wishes prosecutor good luck on appeal; whether apparent bias doctrine can be engaged by post-trial conduct of judge; legal effect of serving BSB
prosecutions department officer being 1 of 4 appointing members of the COIC «Tribunals Appointments Body» (TAB); whether TAB ultra vires the
Bar's Constitutions; whether open - ended power of removal of member of COIC pool without cause, unlawful given position of BSB Chair and senior staff on COIC; whether ECHR Article 6 guarantees
against pressure on disciplinary judges to conform with a prosecutorial mentality; whether disciplinary judges Art. 6 «independent» within Findlay v United Kingdom given key role of BSB
prosecutions department in appointing disciplinary judges; serious non-disclosure by BSB of notes of secret meeting between BSB and disciplinary judge until day before appeal and despite requests and application for disclosure by defence)
Outlaw the
Bar's overreaching of the Judicial Conduct Commission and require that any ethics
prosecutions or disbarment actions
against Judges by the
Bar Counsel, must first be recommended by the Judicial Conduct Commission.