Instead, it confirmed the trial judge's determinations that «the transcript is indicative of only
the prosecutorial side of the case,» id., at E-14; that the public's right of access was overborne by the «reasonable likelihood of substantial prejudice» to «the defendant's right to a fair trial,» id., at E-9; and that» [alternatives] to sealing the transcript would not suffice in this [17] case,» id., at E-14.