Sentences with phrase «protect business arrangements»

A Business Collaboration Agreement is a great way to establish the ground rules for your artwork; it can help protect business arrangements, friendships, and future projects.

Not exact matches

Is there a NK «interests» section in the US, a consular arrangement for NK citizens, a protecting power arrangement, or some other kind of proxy or third - party arrangement or similar, for citizen or business protection or state representation or both, and if so what are the details??

With this arrangement, one party is protecting its business by making sure to purchase the commodity at a certain price before it has the chance to increase, while another party makes a bulk sale at a set price before it has the chance to decrease.

To protect a business in case of the death of a key employee, key person insurance, payable to the company, provides the owners with the financial flexibility needed to either hire a replacement or work out an alternative arrangement.

Use this type of coverage to protect family income, for estate planning, for extra retirement income or philanthropy or to protect your business with buy / sell agreements, key person coverage or compensation arrangements.

There's a wealth of interesting and essential material here: a restatement of the directors» fiduciary duty to the corporation, and the extent to which consideration of other stakeholders» interests may enter into that duty; the «business judgment» rule; the obligation of a court in approving an arrangement under s. 192 of the Canada Business Corporations Act and the test to be used; and the nature of the s. 241 oppression remedy and the interests prbusiness judgment» rule; the obligation of a court in approving an arrangement under s. 192 of the Canada Business Corporations Act and the test to be used; and the nature of the s. 241 oppression remedy and the interests prBusiness Corporations Act and the test to be used; and the nature of the s. 241 oppression remedy and the interests protected.

Any company that has more than one shareholder should regulate the arrangements between the shareholders in order to protect the business.

We note that there may be other instances in which a business associate may combine or aggregate protected health information received in its capacity as a business associate of different covered entities, such as when it is performing health care operations on behalf of covered entities that participate in an organized health care arrangement.

Although the exception for disclosure of protected health information for treatment could be sufficient to relieve physicians and hospitals of the contract requirement, we also believe that this arrangement does not meet the true meaning of «business associate,» because both the hospital and physician are providing services to the patient, not to each other.

In addition, the business associate would have had to have been authorized through the contract or arrangement with each covered entity that supplied the protected health information to combine or aggregate the information.

For example, a business associate performing a function under health care operations on behalf of an organized health care arrangement would be permitted to combine or aggregate the protected health information obtained from covered entities participating in the arrangement to the extent necessary to carry out the authorized activity and in conformance with its business associate contracts.

The final rule requires a covered entity with a business associate to have a written contract or other arrangement that documents satisfactory assurance that the business associate will appropriately safeguard protected health information.

Similarly, the regulation does not require a business associate arrangement when protected health information is shared for purposes of providing treatment.

Termination of the arrangement would be required only if it became clear that a business associate could not be relied upon to maintain the privacy of protected health information provided to it.

For example, covered entities that operate as «organized health care arrangements» as defined in this rule may share protected health information for the operation of such arrangement without becoming business associates of one another.

These changes mean that § 164.502 (e) requires a business associate contract (or other arrangement, as applicable) not only when the covered entity discloses protected health information to a business associate, but also when the business associate creates or receives protected health information on behalf of the covered entity.

While we permit uses or disclosures of protected health information for a variety of purposes, business associate contracts or other arrangements are only required for those cases in which the covered entity is disclosing information to someone or some organization that will use the information on behalf of the covered entity, when the other person will be creating or obtaining protected health information on behalf of the covered entity, or when the business associate is providing the specified services to the covered entity and the provision of those services involves the disclosure of protected health information by the covered entity to the business associate.

If the volunteer performs its work off - site and needs protected health information, a business associate arrangement will be required.

The result of the case is to reinforce the need for business arrangements to be protected by a legally enforceable contract.

NAR supports legislation that will protect American businesses and consumers by preventing Internet Service Providers (ISPs) from blocking, throttling, or discriminating against Internet traffic and prohibit paid prioritization (fast lane) arrangements.

NAR supports network neutrality rules that protect real estate businesses and consumers by preventing Internet Service Providers (ISPs) not only from blocking, throttling or discriminating against lawful content on the internet, but also would prohibit paid prioritization (fast lanes) arrangements and other content protections.

«NAR supports open internet rules that protect American businesses and consumers by preventing Internet Service Providers (ISPs) not only from blocking, throttling, or discriminating against internet traffic and prohibit paid prioritization arrangements, but also interconnection issues and other anti-competitive practices,» NAR said in its comments.