The Electronic Frontier Foundation today announced that it has asked a federal court to
protect the free speech rights of MoveOn.org and Brave New Films after YouTube removed their video, «Stop the Falsiness,» a satire poking fun at Stephen Colbert's Comedy Central show, «The Colbert Report.»
Not exact matches
Although Thiel implies in his essay that the Gawker story about Hogan's sex tape would not have been published by any
right - thinking journalistic outlet, and that the First Amendment doesn't and shouldn't
protect such behavior, two higher - court judges ruled before the Hogan decision that the Gawker piece was clearly covered by the Constitution's
free -
speech protections.
He suggested that although the jurors might find the video, Gawker and Hogan's sex life distasteful, they must
protect the First Amendment
right to
free speech.
This year's shareholder proposals filed or coordinated by NCPPR ask companies «to
protect political
free speech rights, but all those that have been challenged at the SEC have been omitted,» Proxy Preview elaborates.
A parallel can be found in a civil
right as sacred as that of
free speech, which can not be infringed but does suffer some regulation: pornography, fighting words, and libel are not
protected from state law by the First Amendment.
The laws that
protect Fred Phelps»
right to hold up reprehensible signs also
protect the
free speech of all other religions, whether we think them
right or wrong.
The United States
protects the
right of
free speech because it allows this kind of hateful
speech.
In a statement, Broglio's office said: «Archbishop Broglio and the Archdiocese stand firm in the belief, based on legal precedent, that such a directive from the Army (about not reading the letter) constituted a violation of his Constitutionally -
protected right of
free speech and the
free exercise of religion, as well as those same
rights of all military chaplains and their congregants.»
Third,
free speech ought not be absolutized because the First Amendment basically
protects, not the
right of the press to speak, but the
right of every citizen to know.
HappyMeal The
right of a woman to control her own reproductive life is like the
right to
free speech: You don't have to agree with how people exercise that
right to still want to
protect their
right to do it.
In general,
free speech is highly
protected in the U.S., and perhaps has greater protections than any other
right, under the law.
In response to calls from Humanists UK and others, the Joint Committee on Human
Rights has today published comprehensive guidance on the law
protecting and limiting
free speech for students and universities.
«Under the guise of promoting
free speech and
protecting individual liberties, it tramples on women's
rights and undermines our values of freedom and equality,» Cuomo said in a statement.
«When our government criminalizes the very
free speech that the First Amendment was written to
protect, sends people to prison for simply exercising their constitutional
rights, and wields its power like a weapon against political enemies, we are all in trouble.»
They want smaller, local prisons; a digital bill of
rights to
protect internet users against security agencies; a second freedom bill to counteract heavy - handed policing of protests and
protect free speech.
«The NYPD
protected the
right of
free speech even though they were targets of false and abusive tirades,» the governor said.
«
Free speech is the cornerstone to our democracy and the defendants» actions in this instance are a flagrant violation of my client's
protected rights as a citizen of this nation,» Vacco said.
This section specifically was found to violate the
rights of
free speech, as
protected by the First Amendment, for a collection of individuals gathered via contractual agreement.
He discusses how these research findings can inform standards for the regulation of
free speech to
protect youth development and human
rights.
A new U.K. bill set for this spring could
protect scholars» and reporters»
free speech rights
This analysis reflects the fact that the federal Constitution
protects us from certain kinds of governmental action — such as state - imposed segregation, prohibitions on
free speech, or invasions of personal privacy — but does not create expansive positive
rights or guarantee governmental assistance.
Both in civics lessons and in everyday interactions, K — 12 schools «don't treat
free speech as the preeminent
protected right that it is,» said legal scholar Catherine J. Ross, who explores this issue in a new book, Lessons in Censorship: How Schools and Courts Subvert Students» First Amendment
Rights.
«It's very important that we elicit multiple views and honor
free speech, but also
protect human
rights,» Weissbourd says.
You know those pesky constitutionally
protected rights like
free speech or the ability to petition your government for the redress of grievances.
While school officials must
protect students and prevent disruptions, they are also legally obligated to respect students»
right to
free speech.
In June, the Supreme Court ruled that First Amendment
free -
speech rights protect a politician's false claims to have earned military medals.
As I understand their argument, it is this: The Blaine amendments have the effect of restricting the constitutionally
protected rights of freedom of
speech and the
free exercise of religion
protected in the 1st and 14th Amendments.
Those in favor of his suspension generally point out that America's 1st Amendment guarantee of
free speech only
protects you from government interference regarding political
speech (and does not prevent employers from exercising their
rights to discipline employees), whereas those defending Robertson have been quick to lament the knee - jerk reaction to those expressing counter-progressive cultural beliefs in a very clumsy fashion, and claim there is a double standard in which politically unpopular conservative viewpoints are quicker to result in job terminations than politically unpopular liberal viewpoints that are also clumsily expressed.
These types of punishments are utilized at the discretion of the school administrators, who sometimes find themselves in the difficult position of
protecting students»
right to
free speech while still
protecting them from bullying.
In particular, Gates refers to the First Amendment of the United States Constitution, which
protects freedom of
speech, the
right to peaceably assemble, and the
free exercise of religion.
Some were roommate ads involving constitutionally
protected speech and the
right to
free association, such as «prefer christian roommate», or were ads containing incidental and harmless remarks such as «near St Gertrude's church,» and «Buddhist temple nearby.»
Courts have found that people still have
free -
speech rights when it comes to publishing information over the internet, but that they're not
protected from being sued by their comments.
As one might expect, the NLRB
protects free speech by employees, especially where employee
rights and relations with employers are concerned.
U.S. District Court Judge Indira Talwani determined that enjoining the defendants from making defamatory statements in the future does not violate their constitutional
free speech rights, and will
protect Dr. Sindi from future harm.
Basically, this is to
protect people who are exercising legal
free speech and fair use
rights from suffering legal burdens of fighting a case where the plaintiff alleges copyright or defamation charges against defendant when that is of extremely questionable grounds.
Free speech and free assembly remain protected by the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, a core part of our Constitution and the country's fundamental
Free speech and
free assembly remain protected by the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, a core part of our Constitution and the country's fundamental
free assembly remain
protected by the Canadian Charter of
Rights and Freedoms, a core part of our Constitution and the country's fundamental law.
Represented a Connecticut employer concerning the extent to which the Connecticut Constitution's Declaration of
Rights protects employees» free speech rights in the work
Rights protects employees»
free speech rights in the work
rights in the workplace.
West Coast LEAF has also written a letter urging the Senate to pass the Bill as drafted and without delay to
protect the
rights of trans people in Canada to be
free from hate
speech and discrimination on the basis of their gender identity.
In the end, Brenner seemed convinced the higher court came to feel
protecting the First Amendment and the
right to
free speech is what should be viewed as paramount.
Laws in Canada and in British Columbia
protect people from hateful
speech,
protect the
right to political and religious beliefs and the
right to be
free from sexual harassment.
I'm also all for law firms
protecting our
right of
free speech.
By showing the publicly accessible TVO video in class, she was accused of creating an unsafe and toxic learning environment, the crime of transphobia, violating Laurier's gender violence policy and somehow breaching both the Charter of
Rights (which actually
protects free speech) and the Canadian Human
Rights Act (which didn't apply to Laurier), proving that when non-lawyers in positions of power think they know the law, they always get it wrong when they use it to bully and harass their subordinates.
So, if you lived somewhere like Iran where not having a blasphemy law was politically impossible to achieve, I'd rather have an imperfect
right to
free speech that
protected non-religious
speech, than no
right to
free speech of any kind.
What you are saying makes no more sense than saying that because state constitutions
protect free speech, the constitutional
right to
free speech «would never come up.»
But at what point does
protecting a specific group from theoretical acts of violence win out over the
right to
free speech?
In an effort to
protect patient and public safety while balancing
free speech rights, the law established a 35 - foot zone in which no protests or demonstrations are permitted during health center operating hours.