@Maria, As I said before, if you do it to
protect individual citizen's rights, and you do it evenly to ALL religions; yes, you can.
Now how effective the guns are at
protecting individual citizens is a different matter for a different question, but this is a great summary of the legal background.
If we could record and move assets in a way that
protects individual citizens, then democracy, rule of law and capitalism will all be strengthened.
Not exact matches
It also prevents a majority from easily taking away the rights of minorities for it's third primary function of
protecting individual liberties of American
citizens, whether they belong to a majority or a minority we are to be equal under the law.
The Constitution could not take for granted that its
citizens would all be motivated by civic virtue and so its concern was as much to
protect individuals and groups from abuse at the hands of the government and their fellow
citizens as it was to involve all its
citizens in genuine participation.
Since pastors are free to make political endorsements as
individual citizens, just not in their official capacities as leaders of the church, supporters of the Johnson Amendment contend that rather than restricting political speech, the rules
protect nonprofits from lobbying interests.
There is no instance in all my memory, where the ARI has blatantly said that torture is the right course of action, but always have stated basically «in war, if a method works to either defeat the enemy or prevent our civilians or soldiers from being killed, then it is completely moral, since the government's moral duty is to
protect the
individual rights of its
citizens.»
Conflicts arise between
individual freedom of choice and the right of the state to
protect and promote the welfare of all its
citizens.
As the Trump administration has shifted policies on undocumented immigrants and
individuals with temporary
protected status (TPS), putting more
individuals at risk of deportation, Christians have quickly brought up the dilemma of mixed - status families, whose children are US
citizens but parents are not.
Can an
individual or legal (a
citizens» group, activist, NGO among others) entity sue the government for not
protecting me from these manifestly dangerous criminals?
He seeks to bridge the left and right under the party that has long sought to
protect individual rights and limit the power of government in the lives of
citizens.
There is not a prerequisite that an
individual be a
citizen to have their rights
protected, though there may be a few more hoops for them to go through to exercise those rights.
And it's as precious a thing as we have in this country: the rule of law - the ability of
citizens to stand up to authorities, the shield which
protects the
individual from the executive.
«The 2018 elections are critical in electing
individuals who will not put the special interests of a select few ahead of the most important functions of government — education, safety and
protecting our most vulnerable
citizens.»
Do they wish to go down an old and trodden path with Supervisor Gromack that has taken the town to the second highest property taxes in the United States where senior
citizens were to be sold out to
protect the Town's reserve fund and its bond street rating, where the properety values of
citizens living in the Town of Clarkstown would not be
protected by implementation of a Ward System, where consolidation of purchasing functions with the County would not occur, and where systemic corruption would continue to grow as revealed by several arrests of
individuals receiving compensation from the Town?
In a move of potential significance to public schools nationwide, the U.S. Supreme Court last week accepted an appeal involving the right of
individuals to sue when government entities fail to
protect them from violence by private
citizens.
However, because standardized testing is a matter of public concern, a local speaking as a union, or an
individual member speaking as a parent or
citizen, about educational concerns over standardized testing, for instance, in a letter to the editor or in a statement to the Board of Education, is
protected by the U.S. Constitution at least so long as they are not encouraging other parents or students to opt out from a test.»
When outsiders feel this decision involves the senior
citizen being scammed or taken advantage of, it's time to seek outside dispute resolution to
protect the
individual.
Taking care of veterans and the
individuals who
protect this country in all of the different armed services should be a priority, not just for government agencies, but for
individual companies and
citizens as well.
That's what doesn't register amongst the Tea Party, and where much of its magical thinking about the environment falls apart — you can't
protect the nation's air, water, and wildlife just by being a determined,
individual citizen and guiding your personal choice towards the morally correct end.
It seeks a society characterized by freedom of thought for
individuals, limitations on power, especially of government and religion, the rule of law, the free exchange of ideas, a market economy that supports relatively free private enterprise, and a transparent system of government in which the rights of all
citizens are
protected.
After all, the spirit of free movement law seems to be that the right to residence is not solely the reward for meritorious behavior; it is supposed to
protect even those
individuals who are no model
citizens, as is for example expressed in the decision Orfanopoulos.
They do not provide objective assurances that
individual citizens can be adequately
protected from persecution.»
Like the
citizens of a country, the independent nations of Europe (those that have signed the agreement) have ceded some
individual power to a court to administer and
protect their shared values with respect to human rights.
The private lives of
individual citizens are
protected by ensuring that proper limitations on the use of surveillance of
individual citizens are observed by government.
The codes of conduct need to strike a careful balance between allowing freedom of expression (which is a fundamental right of all UK
citizens enshrined under Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights), and
protecting the rights of other
individuals and employees not to be subject to harassment or inappropriate comment.
Different private and public,
individual and collective, interests have to be balanced and harmonised in a transparent and accountable manner, especially when security and data - protection principles need to be implemented to
protect citizens and
citizens» rights at the same time.
If you take the AAJ, American Association for Justice, for example, and its work in lobbying to
protect the rights of
individual citizens in this country is unbelievably important.
In a report published last week, «Surveillance:
Citizens and the State», the House of Lords Constitution Committee sets out 44 widesweeping recommendations to
protect individuals from the «pervasive and routine» electronic surveillance and collection and processing of personal information.
For the rule of law to exist,
citizens (and others) must have a right of access to an independent lawyer who is able to defend their freedoms without fear or interference, and to ensure that their
individual rights are
protected against abuses and excesses of power by the state and by those acting in its name.
So whether you are a senior
citizen or you are the head of a young family, don't believe the myths because they are purely misconceptions that have been created by
individuals who have never had Troy renters insurance to
protect the contents of their home.
At the same time, we need to ensure that those
citizens have the best of intentions — and that the communities your organization strives to help are
protected from untrustworthy
individuals.
This factsheet provides information on how communities and
individual citizens can strengthen families,
protect children, and prevent child abuse and neglect.