Not exact matches
Plaintiffs claim that
Defendants did not adequately
protect the Network Platforms
and, as a result, unauthorized people were able to access certain accountholder information.
«In spite of these efforts,
and in light of the hazards that are here
and worsening,
Plaintiffs are spending,
and must continue to spend, millions of dollars to
protect their property
and residents from the impacts of climate change... Despite receiving the warning that «fossil fuel use should not be encouraged,»
Defendants spent decades selling
and promoting fossil fuels without disclosing the dangers that continued fossil fuel over-use posed.»
«But damages can be awarded only for harm «actually incurred,»
and Plaintiffs allege at most speculative future harms that may never eventuate...
Plaintiffs» requested damages award would also violate
Defendants» constitutional due process rights by imposing massive retroactive liability for conduct that was legal — in fact, encouraged — at the time it occurred (
and still is today), as well as for
protected First Amendment activities.»
The
plaintiffs also employ wild leaps of logic divorced from reality: «By hiding what they knew about,
and affirmatively misrepresenting the dangers of unabated fossil fuel use, the
Defendants protected fossil fuel demand,
and obstructed the changes needed to prevent or at least minimize the impacts of climate change.»
Order
Defendants to prepare
and implement an enforceable national remedial plan to phase out fossil fuel emissions
and draw down excess atmospheric CO2 so as to stabilize the climate system
and protect the vital resources on which
Plaintiffs now
and in the future will depend...
Trade Secret Litigation: advise
and represent
plaintiffs across various industries seeking to
protect proprietary information from competitors
and former employees; represent
defendants accused of trade secret misappropriation.
Despite significant medical testimony in support of
plaintiff's case
and in spite of enormous emotional impact of the death of a young woman who left a widower
and a young son, Kevin obtained a
defendant's verdict
and then was able to
protect the verdict at the Appellate
and Supreme Court level.
The
plaintiffs unsuccessfully alleged, among other things, that the
defendant solicitors failed to
protect their ownership interest in the partnership dispute
and forced them into a sale of their partnership interest, that the solicitors acted without their authorization or instruction,
and failed to keep them properly advised of proceedings throughout.
Provision of a Privacy Log which details the information
protected from disclosure in order for
plaintiffs to determine more clearly the necessity of the disclosure of such data
and possibilities for amendment of the Protective Order in order to safeguard
defendants from liability for the production of this data
The
plaintiffs must prove that the Loblaws
Defendants had a duty to
protect their subcontractors» employees,
and that by purchasing products manufactured in Bangladesh, they took on health
and safety responsibilities that would normally rest with the overseas employer.
Basically, this is to
protect people who are exercising legal free speech
and fair use rights from suffering legal burdens of fighting a case where the
plaintiff alleges copyright or defamation charges against
defendant when that is of extremely questionable grounds.
The purpose of the Limitations Act is
protect defendants by ensuring
plaintiffs pursue their action in a timely manner,
and provide certainty
and finality for
defendants.
We excel at helping
defendants and plaintiffs protect their interests in litigation over contracts, employment agreements, construction problems, real estate deals,
and white - collar investigations
and lawsuits.
This is applicable any time a
defendant's alleged conduct was prohibited by a statute,
and the harm suffered by the
plaintiff is the type of harm the statute was designed to
protect against.
The following elements must be met in order for a statutory duty of care to apply: the statute or regulation must clearly define the required standard of conduct; the statute or regulation must have been intended to prevent the kind of harm the
defendant's act caused; the
plaintiff must be in the class of persons the statute or regulation was designed to
protect;
and the violation must have been the proximate cause of the injury.
Negligence per se applies when a
defendant violates a law designed to
protect a class of which the
plaintiff is a member, the violation causes an accident,
and the law was designed to prevent the type of harm that results.
The purpose of pleading a John Doe
defendant is to
protect the
plaintiff and the
plaintiff's lawyer from circumstances in which it is later argued that they ought to have known the identity of the
defendant in question,
and that the limitation period was therefore missed.
In her evidence
and counsel submissions, the
defendant acknowledges the private nature of the stay when she submits that she did everything she could to
protect the
plaintiff's privacy during her shift.