But unions want to
protect teacher tenure and pay all teachers the same, regardless of effectiveness.
Not exact matches
Magee said Brown «has got it all wrong» on
teacher tenure, arguing that it
protects students and
teachers alike.
«
Tenure prevents high
teacher turnover and
protects New Yorkers against the politics of personal bias, favoritism, and cronyism in our schools.
Only
tenured teachers are
protected by unions.
Tenure laws that
protect grossly ineffective
teachers actually harm better
teachers, who are unfairly tarnished by association with unquestionably bad
teachers.
The policy analysis showed that in districts across the United States,
tenure continues to
protect ineffective veteran
teachers from performance - based dismissal, the shortest possible timeline for dismissing such a
teacher is unreasonably protracted, and dismissal is vulnerable to challenge.
Shanker supported
tenure protections for
teachers after a three - or four - year probationary period because he believed that it was an important tool for attracting high - quality
teachers and
protecting academic freedom.
But he argued that
tenure should not
protect bad
teachers and that unions should be at the forefront of «removing those who are incompetent, with due process.»
That would allow schools to ensure high standards at
tenure time and to
protect teachers from favoritism with transparency, rather than lengthy due - process requirements, which end up
protecting a lot of ineffective
teachers.
While defenders of
tenure claim that it merely
protects teachers from arbitrary dismissal, critics contend that
tenure now makes it extremely difficult to remove poorly performing
teachers from the classroom.
Tenure protects teachers, but they should still be held accountable.
Provisions about how
teachers will be hired,
tenured, and distributed among schools and how they are assigned work have profound budgetary consequences, as do measures like salary cost averaging that districts adopt in order to
protect teacher placement rights.
Overwhelming majorities agree that
tenure should be based on
teacher performance, should not
protect ineffective
teachers, and should be periodically re-evaluated.
Maine's school boards are being urged to eliminate seniority clauses from
teachers» contracts as the result of a state high - court decision, handed down this summer, that state law does not
protect tenured teachers at the expense of nontenured
teachers in layoff decisions.
The principal argument against reforming
tenure laws is that they
protect good
teachers from unfair dismissal.
The plaintiffs in the case, minority students in California, had argued that California's
teacher tenure system violates the equal protection clause because it
protects teachers who are ineffective, and poor and minority students are more likely to be assigned these ineffective
teachers.
That process will allow the lawsuits» supporters to publicize embarrassing facts about incompetent
teachers protected by
tenure and generate momentum for reform in the legislature.
«We are proud of the steps New York City has taken in recent years to strengthen
tenure but we also recognize that we still don't have a fully fair, efficient system that
protects teachers and students,» said April Rose, a fourth grade
teacher in Queens, N.Y. «Our vision for
tenure is to set a high bar and a clear process, and in doing so, allow district and school leaders to focus on more pressing concerns like reducing attrition among educators in their first few years and creating safe, supportive school environments.»
But judging from the media reports of the Vergara ruling — almost all of which prominently use «seniority» and «
tenure» — they will have an uphill battle altering the public perception of
protecting bad
teachers.
The Huffington Post started by asking respondents about their views on labor unions, as
teachers» unions generally work to
protect practices like
tenure.
As for
tenure: 89 % of
teachers agree that
tenure should reflect evaluations of
teacher effectiveness, 92 % say
tenure should not
protect ineffective
teachers, and 80 % say that
tenure should be periodically re-evaluated.
Though they do
protect all
teachers from discrimination, pay decreases, and unwarranted attacks via the US government, it also
tenures ineffective and sometimes negligent
teachers into positions that they should not be holding.
This week, on February 17, 2015, Educators 4 Excellence - Los Angeles published a policy paper on
teacher tenure titled, Reimagining Tenure Protecting Our Students and Our F
tenure titled, Reimagining
Tenure Protecting Our Students and Our F
Tenure Protecting Our Students and Our Future.
And yes,
tenure protects teachers from being unfairly punished for controversial political views (although that protection is probably more aptly applied to college professors).
These
teachers, the plaintiffs say, are
protected by the current laws governing
tenure, seniority and dismissal.
Some models do add new costs, for such things as purchasing technology; making facilities and furniture changes in existing schools; transitioning pay discrepancies for some
tenured or contract -
protected teachers; or obtaining design assistance to choose and tailor reach models.
Nichols, a former
teacher, told the court that she believed the dismissal and
tenure statutes
protected her rights as a
teacher.
Granted there are many issues with seniority /
tenure protecting bad
teachers that must be changed, maybe as a condition, but pay is too low.
Teachers union critics say the
tenure and seniority laws that were hobbled by the June ruling
protect longtime educators who are ineffective while more proficient ones with less experience face layoffs first.
Buncombe County explores how it can
protect career status for all of its eligible
teachers, in spite of a state mandate requiring that 25 percent of
teachers give up
tenure rights this fall.
Analysts at the Fordham Foundation created a rubric for gauging the difficulty of firing ineffective
teachers based on these three metrics: Does
tenure protect veteran
teachers from performance - based dismissal?
In the end,
tenure only
protects bad
teachers.
They have called for basing
teacher tenure on student performance and abolishing «last - in, first - out,» which
protects senior
teachers in layoffs.
Teachers in Louisiana have all but lost the
tenure rules that once
protected their jobs.
Dare any reformer mention how
tenure protects laggard and criminally - abusive
teachers from being sacked from classrooms and you will see NEA and AFT bosses, along with traditionalists in their amen corner, accusing that person of hating
teachers and not respecting their hard work.
In recent years, a number of states have enacted
tenure reforms, thereby potentially transforming the landscape and traditionally
protected structure of the
teacher labor market.
In this way,
tenure actually helped
protect some
teachers from unfairly being dismissed from their jobs in the wake of integration.
Where administrators are careful to maintain the documentation they should be anyway, incompetent
teachers are not
protected by
tenure or seniority in any contract.
On Tuesday, the judge in that case tossed out
tenure protection rules saying
tenure protects teachers at the expense of students.
I think it's also possible that — having watched a lot of school districts over the years — not having a moment at which you have to make a
tenure decision could allow districts to just keep fairly mediocre
teachers along, without doing the due diligence of making a decision in the early years that would
protect kids from
teachers just kind of hanging on.
In my opinion, folks need to converge on their state assembly - persons and let them know in no uncertain terms that constitutionally
protected property rights such as K - 12
teacher tenure is one of the issues we elect them to safeguard.
Originally enacted to
protect against potential evils in state and local employment systems, such as nepotism, arbitrary dismissal, and political favoritism,
tenure has become a common expectation of
teacher employment.
Tenure is intended to
protect teachers with demonstrated teaching skills against arbitrary or capricious dismissal.
The court noted that the U.S. Supreme Court had long ago decided that the Indiana
teacher tenure statute created contractual rights that are
protected by the federal Impairment of Contracts Clause.
And the press loves to highlight outrageous stories such as New York City's rubber room, where ineffective
teachers,
protected by
tenure, spend years being paid to do nothing.
Yes, schools need to get rid of bad
teachers and the
tenure that
protects them.
Originating in the early 1900s to
protect teachers from facing arbitrary dismissals, laws vary by state, but most commonly stipulate that
teachers receive
tenured status after three years.25 Tenured teachers can still be fired, but dismissal requires due p
tenured status after three years.25
Tenured teachers can still be fired, but dismissal requires due p
Tenured teachers can still be fired, but dismissal requires due process.
In effect,
tenure and seniority work together to give employers the flexibility to lay people off when economic circumstances require it, but in a way that
protects teachers from being arbitrarily targeted, or targeted because they were paid more than more junior faculty.
In mid-April, Mulgrew agreed with Klein to streamline the
teacher - discipline process in a way that, by the end of the year, will close New York's so - called rubber rooms, the infamous «reassignment centers» where the New York City
teachers charged with the most extreme incompetence or misconduct (currently 600 out of 80,000) are sent to do nothing while they await
tenure -
protected arbitration hearings.
While their involvement was once intricately linked to
teacher professionalism and school success, today they are locked in a mindset that is focused almost entirely on
protecting collective bargaining rights and ensuring that
tenure, seniority and uniform pay scales dictate who gets paid what, and who stays and goes in the classroom.