Sentences with phrase «protected against disclosure»

The plaintiff will be entitled to first edit out all information contained in or on said «document» that is clearly protected against disclosure as being privileged and confidential;

Third - party communications are only protected against disclosure in the context of litigation privilege.

«The client's right to be protected against the disclosure of their confidential communications with their lawyers is a cornerstone of the rule of law, and has existed for centuries.

Only confidential emails with a lawyer for the purposes of giving or receiving legal advice will always be protected against disclosure.

All information sent through the booking engine is encrypted in an SSL session, protecting against disclosure to third parties.

In a 69 - page opinion in O'Grady v. Superior Court, the California Court of Appeal said that the trial court erred in refusing to grant an order protecting against disclosure of their identities.

While they may be able to assert privilege against third parties in such circumstances, if they want privilege to protect against disclosure to the beneficiaries, they must fund the advice themselves.

This creates a very sensitive potential violation of HIPAA and other laws protecting against disclosure of the AIDS status of individuals.

Not exact matches

Because of the large number of business plans and related materials that we review, and the similarity of many such plans and materials, we can not accept responsibility for protecting against misuse or disclosure of any confidential or proprietary information or other materials in the absence of our express written agreement to do so.

The SEC promotes full public disclosure, protects investors against fraudulent and manipulative practices in the market, and monitors corporate takeover actions in the United States.

To the extent permitted by law, we will disclose your information to government authorities or third parties if: (a) required to do so by law, or in response to a subpoena or court order; (b) we believe in our sole discretion that disclosure is reasonably necessary to protect against fraud, to protect the property or other rights of us or other users, third parties or the public at large; or (c) we believe that you have abused the Sites or the Applications by using them to attack other systems or to gain unauthorized access to any other system, to engage in spamming or otherwise to violate applicable laws.

Disclosures Founding Moms will not disclose any of your personal information to third parties without your permission except in the following circumstances: (i) to investigate and defend Founding Moms against any third party claims or allegations or otherwise to protect Founding Moms from liability, (ii) to investigate, prevent or take action regarding suspected or actual illegal activities, (iii) to assist government enforcement agencies, respond to a legal process or comply with the law, (iv) to exercise or protect the rights, property or personal safety of the users of the Service and / or (v) to protect the security or integrity of the Service.

We will protect personal information by reasonable security safeguards against loss or theft, as well as unauthorized access, disclosure, copying, use or modification.

Wellness Mama takes reasonable security measures to protect the security and confidentiality of your personal information that we collect and maintain against loss, theft, and misuse, as well as unauthorized access, disclosure, alteration, and destruction.

We will protect personal information by reasonable security safeguards against loss or theft, as well as unauthorized access, disclosure, copying, use or modification.

The DOT will initiate appropriate actions against responsible persons who take, threaten to take, or fail to take a personnel action with respect to any employee, former employee, or applicant for employment because of any protected disclosure of information.

Store all reader information exclusively in countries that have strong privacy protecting laws, especially as against demands for disclosure by law enforcement and private third parties;

You are also responsible for taking reasonable steps to protect your personal information against unauthorized disclosure or misuse.

Climate Reality has established appropriate technical, physical, and organization security measures to protect Donors» personal information against loss, theft, unauthorized use, disclosure, or modification.

The state's attorney general released a new disclosure form to protect solar consumers against the behavior of unethical solar installers.

The standard in FIPPA is that public bodies must protect personal information by making reasonable security arrangements against such risks as unauthorized access, collection, use, disclosure or disposal.

We adopt appropriate data collection, storage and processing practices and security measures to protect against unauthorized access, alteration, disclosure or destruction of your personal information, username, password, transaction information and data stored on our Properties and via 3rd party applications.

Ransomware is a choice weapon against legal firms, as attackers understand that firms are highly motivated to protect the confidentiality of their data as well as obligated by ABA Model Rules to make reasonable efforts to prevent disclosure or unauthorized access to client data.

Defending claims against lawyers in the current climate is an uphill battle: Franchisees are often treated by the courts almost as a «protected class» as judges seem to strive to make findings in their favour in disputes with franchisors over disclosure.

That prohibition exists to protect «a person who has chosen to be represented by a lawyer in a matter against possible overreaching by other lawyers who are participating in the matter, interference by those lawyers with the client - lawyer relationship and the uncounselled disclosure of information relating to the representation.»

This judgment confirms that an incorrect analysis (even in good faith) by an employer of whether a disclosure was protected provided no protection against a whistleblowing claim.

James Bullock, head of litigation and compliance at Pinsent Masons, says: «LPP is a rule of evidence designed to protect individuals against disclosure to the court.

Incriminatory material The correct analysis was that the privilege against self - incrimination might be engaged by a requirement of disclosure of knowledge of the means of access to protected data under compulsion of law.

Marudi therefore urges against the addition of further disclosure requirements, or reducing the limits to try to protect investors.

In Formal Opinion 477, the Ethics Committee went one step further, concluding that «a lawyer may be required to take special security precautions to protect against the inadvertent or unauthorized disclosure of client information when required by an agreement with the client or by law, or when the nature of the information requires a higher degree of security.»

McInnes Cooper uses appropriate security measures to protect against loss, theft, unauthorized access, disclosure, use or modification of personal information.

Before trial, the criminal law seeks to protect an accused from being conscripted against him - or herself by the confession rule, the right to remain silent in the face of state interrogation into suspected criminal conduct, and the absence of a duty of disclosure on the defence: R. v. Hebert, [1990] 2 S.C.R. 151.

FRE 502 protects attorney - client privilege and provides some protection against inadvertent disclosure of ESI in the following ways.

The legislation promotes the full disclosure necessary to the proper investigation and resolution of complaints, by protecting the parties involved in the complaints process (including the executive director of the LSBC) against the prospect that what is communicated during the process will be used against them in other proceedings without their consent.»

Such restrictions would protect against, for example, the unauthorized disclosure of information during a workplace - wide feedback or evaluation session.

He claimed that the laying of charges against him was a detriment following a protected disclosure within the meaning of s 47B of the Employment Rights Act 1996 (ERA 1996), and that he was unfairly dismissed for the same.

Consideration should also be given to whether the reporting or disclosure restrictions will provide sufficient protection from the risk, whether the safety of the parties in cases where the court considers there are particular physical or health risks against which reporting restrictions may be inadequate to afford protection, and the extent to which the court should, of its own motion, take steps to protect the welfare of any vulnerable adult or child who is unrepresented before the court.

In addition, Equal Justice Works may disclose information we maintain (A) if in good faith we believe that such disclosure is necessary to (1) comply with the law or legal process; (2) protect and defend our rights and property; (3) protect against misuse or unauthorized use of the Web site; or (4) protect the personal safety, property, or rights of our users or the public, or (B) in connection with a corporate transaction, such as a divestiture, merger, consolidation, or asset sale.

The law as it currently stands has weak annual reporting requirements from government agencies, does not provide much protection to Canadians from abusive treatment by foreign states, does not give the Privacy Commissioner order - making power, does not provide redress in cases involving harm, does not prevent over-collection of personal information, does not protect against surveillance where the data is not recorded, and does not feature security breach disclosure requirements.

For example, where a public agency commences a disciplinary action against a health professional, and requests protected health information as part of its investigation, the disclosure made be made to the agency under paragraph (d) of this section (relating to health oversight) even if the method of making the request is through the proceeding.

The rule waives the requirement for individual agreement if the victim is unable to agree due to incapacity or other emergency circumstance and: (1) The law enforcement official represents that the protected health information is needed to determine whether a violation of law by a person other than the victim has occurred and the information is not intended to be used against the victim; (2) the law enforcement official represents that immediate law enforcement activity that depends on such disclosure would be materially and adversely affected by waiting until the individual is able to agree to the disclosure; and (3) the covered entity, in the exercise of professional judgment, determines that the disclosure is in the individual's best interests.

We would note that nothing in the final rule overrides Certificates of Confidentiality, which protect against the compelled disclosure of identifying information about subjects of biomedical, behavioral, clinical, and other research as provided by the Public Health Service Act section 301 (d), 42 U.S.C. 241 (d).

(B) If the individual is unable to agree because of incapacity, a law enforcement or other public official authorized to receive the report represents that the protected health information for which disclosure is sought is not intended to be used against the individual and that an immediate enforcement activity that depends upon the disclosure would be materially and adversely affected by waiting until the individual is able to agree to the disclosure.

The security standard authority applies to both the transmission and the maintenance of health information, and requires the entities described in section 1172 (a) to maintain reasonable and appropriate safeguards to ensure the integrity and confidentiality of the information, protect against reasonably anticipated threats or hazards to the security or integrity of the information or unauthorized uses or disclosures of the information, and to ensure compliance with part C by the entity's officers and employees.

Comment: Some commenters argued against imposing the «minimum necessary» requirement on disclosure of protected health information to law enforcement officials.

The covered entity must make the decision whether to disclose only in limited circumstances: when there is no mandatory reporting law; or when the victim is unable to provide agreement and the law enforcement official represents that: the protected health information is needed to determine whether a violation of law by a person other than the victim has occurred, that the information will not be used against the victim, and that immediate law enforcement activity that depends on such information would be materially and adversely affected by waiting until the individual is able to agree to the disclosure.

Thus, we require that the covered entity erect firewalls to protect against the improper use or disclosure within or by the organization.

Third, this paragraph allows covered entities to disclose protected health information about an individual without the individual's agreement if the disclosure is expressly authorized by statute or regulation and either: (1) The covered entity, in the exercise of its professional judgment, believes that the disclosure is necessary to prevent serious harm to the individual or to other potential victims; or (2) if the individual is unable to agree due to incapacity, a law enforcement or other public official authorized to received the report represents that the protected health information for which disclosure is sought is not intended to be used against the individual, and that an immediate enforcement activity that depends on the disclosure would be materially and adversely affected by waiting until the individual is able to agree to the disclosure.

Because we require an authorization for disclosure of psychotherapy notes for «health care operations,» an exception is needed to allow covered entities to use protected health information about an individual to defend themselves against an action threatened or brought by that individual without asking that individual for authorization to do so.

We combine the proposed requirements into a single standard that requires covered entities to safeguard protected health information from accidental or intentional use or disclosure that is a violation of the requirements of this rule Start Printed Page 82562and to protect against the inadvertent disclosure of protected health information to persons other than the intended recipient.