Sentences with phrase «protected back when»

Were religious institutions protected back when interracial couples were allowed to marry?

Practice bracing whenever you get the chance — it will help harden up your abs and also protect your back when you are lifting heavy weights.

Not exact matches

When my daughter Chloe was born 10 years ago, I went back to work after 12 weeks, the max amount of time the Family Medical Leave Act would protect my job.

But when you consider the scope of the Equifax hack — an estimated 143 million people were impacted — the back - of - the - envelope math means the firm could make a lot of money as people try to protect themselves from the fallout.

«When we keep our spine straight, we're engaging our back and abdominal muscles and keeping our spine protected,» Hattendorf said.

Just as Albertans expected their political leaders to fight back when Trudeau - the - dad tried to force his National Energy Plan on them in 1980, British Columbians expect our premier to fight to protect our province from bullies from across the Rockies trying to bisect British Columbia with an unwanted pipeline to deliver toxic bitumen to Burnaby for export on oil tankers.

The Freedom Report's online archives only go back to 1999, but I was curious to see older editions of Paul's newsletters, in part because of a controversy dating to 1996, when Charles «Lefty» Morris, a Democrat running against Paul for a House seat, released excerpts stating that «opinion polls consistently show only about 5 % of blacks have sensible political opinions,» that «if you have ever been robbed by a black teen - aged male, you know how unbelievably fleet - footed they can be,» and that black representative Barbara Jordan is «the archetypical half - educated victimologist» whose «race and sex protect her from criticism.»

A trade war happens when one country puts up a trade barrier, like strict tariffs (which are border taxes on imports), to protect its economy from foreign competition — and another country decides to strike back with its own trade barriers.

Let's go back to what God's Word says when Jesus prays for his disciples: «While I was with them, I protected them and kept them safe by that name you gave me.

And they are slightly more supportive than their elders of government efforts to protect morality...» Back in March of this year, The Pew Forum made news when it reported that 70 % of millennials are in favor of same - sex marriage.

He tells us to take up the shield of faith, but we learn by going back to the Old Testament that the shield is actually God Himself, and He protects us, when, as Christians, we place faith in Him.

Ultimately the religious will never give up their gun's because they don't really have any faith in God to save them and feel they have to take the key's to life and death away from Jesus, then sit back and claim they are defending God and their rights when really they are shouting loud and clear «I DO N'T TRUST YOU TO PROTECT ME JESUS!!

STONER»S PRAYER Now I pass out into sleep I pray the Lord my soul to keep Grant no other stoner take My weed and bong before I wake Keep me safely in thy sight And grant no crackhead's thrill tonight And in the morning let me awake Breathing scents of wake «n bake God protect me in my dreams and make this better than it seems Grant the time may siwftly fly When myself shall be so high In a green grass weed bed Where I long to rest my head Far away from all these scenes And the smell of bammer smoked by beans Take me back into the land Where the cops never take you out Where the weed won't burn my throat like sand; Where the scent of chronis blows Where the good Mary Jane grows; Take me back and I'll promise then Never to leave BC again... - Anonymous

If there was justice in the world, when they get those miners out in Chile, they'd stuff Brady and those he protected in there and seal it back up.

So when Jesus asks his question, know - it - all - Joe in the back probably raises his hand and answers, «You count your 99 blessings, chalk up your loss and protect what you have.»

When you have monreal playing centre back partnering with an out of touch koscienly and Ainsley Maitland Niles playing lb while xhaka is protecting the back 4.

1) On the pitch: - we always start 3 -4-3 but always switch back to a back 4... it isn't tactical as we look bad in both - Bellerin playibg LWB when you have the best in the bundesliga last season on the bench - Welbeck playing the striker role when he can do everything but score when you have Lacazette a record signing on the - Monreal in back 3 when you have Kostafi who can flank Per in the middle protecting him against pace as well as having a commending figure and - Telling Xhaka to not play as a 3rd offensive player when Ramsey dashes - Playing a guy in Ox so out of position and persisting with him over preseason as if he would be there for years when it is clear he doesn't want to play for us (his case is a weird one)

Vidal is a box to box he is not a DM and a DM we need... let me put it like this Vidal will try grab glory by getting goals (much like flamini) we will not take up true glory like Coquelin who knows his job is not to attack but to protect our back 4... not go for gaols but look hold up play when we are getting hit with a counter until the rest of the team get back into play... Someone who will get battered and bruised but not lose his temper or cool but instead battle get in good tackles and disturb the opponents Rhythm...

I often think he is a very good player when he is given one job to do, and in cdm that is protect the back four.

We now play a different game — everyone tackling back, protecting the full backs — counter attacking when we get the ball, BUT not losing our heads (exception = Monaco), but keeping our shape, as we did against City and United.

Ozil sandwich between Welbeck and Monreal is good enough balance, granted Monreal remains true to his defending responsibilities and we know Welbz is a work worse, Ozil can also cut in when attacking and this will protect him from hardworking Kante and Matic who may swallow him in the middle especially without Xhaka and Carzola back there when he loses the ball.

When we played Arteta and Flamini together in the last two games, we didn't concede just because they stayed back and protected the defence even tough they are both poor, Ramsey comes back in and we are exposed because he is found most of the time in the box trying to score like he is a striker and when we are hit on the counter, you will see him running back like he can catchWhen we played Arteta and Flamini together in the last two games, we didn't concede just because they stayed back and protected the defence even tough they are both poor, Ramsey comes back in and we are exposed because he is found most of the time in the box trying to score like he is a striker and when we are hit on the counter, you will see him running back like he can catchwhen we are hit on the counter, you will see him running back like he can catch up.

Song wasn't a good DM for us it's no wonder he failed at Barcelona, he was irresponsible leaving his DM position to provide assists when he was in the team to protect the back 4!

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

The players need to be told in no uncertain terms what they need to do — protect the back 4 at all costs and when you win the ball pass it to Ozil / Sanchez and let them do the rest.

Wenger loves both full - backs to bomb forward at the same time, which ALWAYS gives us so many problems when teams counter, because the two CB's have no help, especially as we don't have an out - and - out DM to protect them.

Like I mentioned with Coquelin, he has done a fantastic job at protecting our back line and has often dominated that midfield by getting stuck in with his opponents, however now we have someone else in the team that can show the same qualities and not be left stranded when the Gunners need that type of player most.

Coquelin can say that again as he's obviously protecting his positional play in the team when he's back to action.

Ox and Debuchy have had nightmare games protecting the right flank... When has a full - back or winger been an issue for us this season with Ramsey and Bellerin playing together on the right?

It should definitely have been the opposite and I felt we were definitely not effective protecting our back 4 when Coquelin was in advanced position, which happened too often in this game.

Carvalho is a big strong CDM who can protect back 4 as well as CB when needed.

We upset many people when we criticise him, he is that never wrong, never his fault kind of player that will be protected, backed and fought for to the hill.

-- When people are playing Offensive Line and trying to protect the QB, hands must be behind the back.

Chelsea dictated the game by parking the bus, with so many men back it forces you to throw more men forward thus exposing your backbone, it happened against QPR, MAN U and will happen against us if we play all out attacking football why because with Arsenal we know when teams park the bus against us everyone comes forward including coq koscielny dubuchy / bellarin and monreal leaving metersacker to protect the fort, they create 1 - 1 situations where Hazard thrives.

These are players that are always protected and backed by their manager and so they owe him at least a proper amount of effort when he picks them.

Back then it seemed as though Harry was keen to reinforce the idea that he'd inherited a terrible side and should they be relegated then it couldn't possibly be his fault — in other words he was protecting his reputation at the expense of his side's chances — how to motivate yourself as a player when your manager continues to question whether you're good enough to stay up?

If you protect the ball and somebody tackles you from behind and kills your knee, when you come back it will be difficult to protect the ball in the same position.Jack has none of that.

An oversized canopy keeps your child well protected from sun and wind, while a mesh back provides excellent ventilation and a clear view to your child when the seat is fully reclined.

So, Danielle, how can a mom protect her milk supply when she goes back to work?

The back of this high - seated ride on is equipped with a parent grab handle perfect for the Little Tikes Princess Cozy Coupe Car's push mode: simply insert the removable floorboard to protect your little one's feet when they aren't powering the car themselves.

When giving your baby a bath, you need to protect the back and ensure that baby does not become fully submerged in the water; hence, you need to arch the back a little.

When the same baby travels rearward facing, the back of the protective car seat shell and the padded side wings protect the head and neck, and absorb and spread the forces of the impact more evenly.

You'll have the capacity to relax about your kid's wellbeing, on account of the protected five - point movable security outfit, while the back wheel brakes and swivel / lockable front wheels guarantee the stroller stays set up when you're enjoying a reprieve from strolling.

Ok, well when we comeback, Rose will be discussing how a breastfeeding mother can protect her milk supply when her baby is jaundiced and sometimes it's a little bit hard for them to really stimulate that milk supply the way that we need them to so, we'll be right back

SUNNY GAULT: Perfect, okay, so when we come back we will discuss have a mom should protect her milk supply and the pump milk as well from spoiling and what to do if the breast milk the daycare feeds the baby is all used.

The International Secretary General of MSF, Oberreit, illustrated this method when, at the same time as the tweet was issued about «victims of EU policies», he called on European governments to change their priorities: «rather than maximising the number of people they can push back, they must maximise the number they welcome and protect.»

«How can the residents of our communities trust an individual who claims he is working for them when he is, in fact, taking money from Republicans whose main focus is protecting the wealthy on the backs of New York's struggling working families?

Friends of Dugdale have since pointed out that Rowley, when seeking election as the Scottish Party's deputy leader last year, promised that if he won he would not accept a protected place at the top of one of the lists from which a 56 of Holyrood's 129 MSPs are elected under a system of proportional representation only to go back on his word as soon as he won that particular race.

The City of Buffalo will never confront its basic problems when the state increases its aid by $ 52 million, he said, and burdensome labor contracts will continue to hold back municipalities as long as their unions are protected by the Taylor Law.

Later, when Avella charged that Senate Republicans «have done something absolutely disgraceful» in gerrymandering district lines to protect their majority, Nozzolio fired back.