These further proceedings, under Judge Alsup, will have to determine whether Google's actions were
protected under fair use.
Even with that time, the jury was still unable to rule whether Google was
protected under the fair use doctrine.
Google countered by arguing its actions were
protected under fair use.
Is
this protected under fair use, and if it is then why could someone not copy a copyrighted anime and change only the story under fair use?
There are currently no court opinions offering any guidelines on mashups, and there are no distinct legal guidelines for determining whether or not a non-parodic work is
protected under fair use.
This suggests that mashups and samplings aren't, in fact,
protected under fair use, but there are still ways that maship artists can defend their works.
«The judges at the Second Circuit court decided that the case would hinge on whether a reasonable observer would find Prince's works to have been transformative, and thus
protected under fair use law.
Not exact matches
The guys from the channel are
protected by law
under fair use.
Mr. Prince, well - known for recycling advertising photographs and other commercial imagery in his work, argued that his appropriation should be allowed
under the
fair -
use exceptions to federal copyright protections, which permit limited borrowing of
protected material for purposes like commentary, criticism, news reporting and scholarship.
Mr. Prince has argued that his
use of the photographs should be allowed
under fair -
use exemptions to copyright protections, which allow limited borrowing of
protected material for purposes like commentary, criticism, news reporting and scholarship.
It is an image
protected by copyright,
used under fair use terms.
Mashup artists who seek protection
under fair use may find their works
protected, depending on how much it transforms the original work.
According to YouTube:
Fair use is a legal doctrine that says you can reuse copyright -
protected material
under certain circumstances without getting permission from the copyright owner.
The link is in connection with a comment on Jones Day; when a trademark is
used to comment on the trademark holder, the
use reinforces the association with the trademark holder, rather than blurring it, and besides
use for commentary is expressly
protected as
fair use under the Lanham Act as amended in 2006.
Again the existing protections
under the Copyright Act should
protect against
use that falls outside the
fair dealing defence.
If any elements of the game are
protected by copyright, then you can not reproduce those elements (17 U.S.C. § 106) unless your reproduction falls
under a
fair use exception (17 U.S.C. § 107).
Since the Axanar works feature new characters, original storylines, original dialogue, etc., they are transformative and
protected under the U.S. copyright doctrine of «
fair use.»