Sentences with phrase «protection of the chest»

In the more severe side pole impact, protection of the chest was adequate and that of other critical body areas was good.

In the full - width rigid barrier test, protection of the chest was marginal, both for the driver and the rear seat passenger.

In the full - width rigid barrier test, high decelerations indicated weak protection of the rear passenger's head and marginal protection of the chest.

Even in the more severe side pole impact, protection of the chest was adequate and that of other parts of the body was good.

In the side barrier test, protection of the chest of the 10 year dummy was poor, based on dummy readings of chest deceleration.

Much of the force on the dummy was deflected to parts of the dummy which do not reflect a real body and protection of the chest area was penalised.

However, in the more severe side pole test, dummy readings of rib compression indicated weak protection of the chest.

For the 6 year dummy, protection of the chest and neck was weak, based on decelerations and tensile forces.

However, in the more severe side pole test, dummy readings indicated marginal protection of the chest and abdomen.

Similarly, dummy readings of lateral rib compression were high and protection of chest was rated as poor.

In the more severe side pole impact, protection of the chest was adequate and that of other areas was good.

In the frontal offset test, protection of the chest and neck of the 10 year dummy was rated as marginal, the chest on the basis of rib decelerations and the neck on the basis of tensile forces.

In the more severe side pole test, protection of the chest was weak.

In the more severe side pole impact, protection of the chest was rated as adequate and that of other body regions was good.

In the side barrier test, protection of the chest was adequate and that of other body regions was good.

In the more severe side pole test, protection of the chest was adequate and that of other critical body areas was good.

For the 6 year dummy, protection of the chest was rated as marginal and the of other critical areas as good or adequate.

Dummy readings indicated good protection of the chest and head but the score was penalised owing to the diagonal part of the seatbelt slipping off the dummy's shoulder in the test.

For the 2005 model year General Motors added torso airbags for front - seat occupants to improve protection of the chest and abdomen with the curtain airbags as an optional airbag package.

Even in the more severe side pole test, protection of the chest was adequate and that of other parts of the body was good.

Protection of the chest was marginal and that of the head was adequate.

As a result, dummy readings for the head and neck were were high and points were scored only for adequate protection of the chest.

In the more severe side pole impact, protection of chest was adequate and that of other body regions was good.

In the full width rigid barrier test, protection of the chest was rated as marginal for both the driver and rear passenger side dummy, as was the head protection for the rear dummy.

However, readings from the 6 year dummy indicated weak protection of the chest and marginal protection of the neck.

In the more severe side pole test, protection of the chest and abdomen was adequate and that of the head and pelvis was good.

Even in the more severe side pole test, protection of the chest was adequate and that of other body areas was good.

In the frontal offset test, protection of the chest of the 6 year dummy was rated as marginal, based on dummy readings of chest decelerations.

For the 6 year dummy, protection of the chest was rated as marginal and that of other critical body areas was good.

Protection of the chest of the 6 year dummy was weak, based on decelerations measured by the dummy.

Even in the more severe side pole test, protection of the chest was adequate and that of other body regions was good.

For the rear passenger, protection of the chest was rated as marginal while that of all other parts of the body was good.

By contrast, the i30 showed weak protection of the chest in the side pole test, although its score for child occupant protection was the highest in this round of tests.

For the rear passenger, protection of the chest was adequate and that of all other body regions was good.

In the more severe side pole impact, protection of the chest was adequate and that of all other body areas was good.

Even in the more severe side pole test, protection of the chest was adequate and that of other critical body areas was good.

In the frontal offset test, dummy readings from the 6 year dummy indicated marginal protection of the chest and poor protection of the neck.

In the more severe side pole impact, protection of the chest was adequate and that of other body areas was good.

Protection of the chest of the rear passenger dummy was marginal, and that of other body areas was good.

In the more severe side pole test, protection of the chest was adequate and that of other parts of the body was good.

In the more severe side pole test, protection of the chest was adequate and that of other critical body regions was good.

However, in the more severe side pole impact, dummy readings of rib compression indicated marginal protection of the chest.

In the full - width rigid barrier test, protection of the chest and neck was adequate for the driver and rear passenger, and that of other critical body areas was good.

Even in the more severe side pole impact, protection of the chest was adequate and that of other body regions was good.

Not exact matches

I've always been a fan of Britax's signature chest guards and with the Advocates max side impact protection, I really feel like she is safe in this seat!

NHTSA is issuing this NPRM to ensure that child restraints provide a minimum level of protection in side impacts by effectively restraining the child, preventing harmful head contact with an intruding vehicle door or child restraint structure, and by attenuating crash forces to the child's head and chest.

In the frontal offset test, protection of the 6 and 10 year dummies was good or adequate with the exception of the chest of the 6 year dummy, for which readings of decelerations indicated marginal protection.

Protection of the driver's chest was rated as marginal, based on dummy readings of chest compression.

In addition to its outstanding crash test scores, the car's passive and active safety equipment includes four antilock disc brakes, front - seat side airbags with individual chambers for chest and hip protection, a set of side curtain airbags, and Volvo's «City Safety» slow - speed frontal - collision mitigation system.

Protection of the 1 1/2 year dummy, sat in a rearward - facing restraint, was good apart from marginally elevated chest decelerations.