TitlePLUS offers more comprehensive
protection than any other title insurance product because only TitlePLUS insures both the title and legal services in a transaction.
Not exact matches
(a) Whenever the Attorney General receives a complaint in writing signed by an individual to the effect that he is being deprived of or threatened with the loss of his right to the equal
protection of the laws, on account of his race, color, religion, or national origin, by being denied equal utilization of any public facility which is owned, operated, or managed by or on behalf of any State or subdivision thereof,
other than a public school or public college as defined in section 401 of
title IV hereof, and the Attorney General believes the complaint is meritorious and certifies that the signer or signers of such complaint are unable, in his judgment, to initiate and maintain appropriate legal proceedings for relief and that the institution of an action will materially further the orderly progress of desegregation in public facilities, the Attorney General is authorized to institute for or in the name of the United States a civil action in any appropriate district court of the United States against such parties and for such relief as may be appropriate, and such court shall have and shall exercise jurisdiction of proceedings instituted pursuant to this section.
She has also produced more French Ring Sport
titled dogs, UKC Dog Sport (
protection / police)
titled dogs and UKC Nosework (detection sport)
titled dogs
than any
other breeder in North America.
Without the
protection of the procedural rights native
title may be more vulnerable to impairment or extinguishment
than other forms of non-Indigenous
title.
First, its use of the term «radical» (for which the Critique offers no citation): The relevant discussion in the article refers to two explicitly «experimental» proposals included at the end of the article, in a section
titled «Thinking Outside of the Box...» The introduction to that part of the discussion states «I call this a «thought experiment» because I am well aware that the practical realities of child
protection practice may mean that it would not work...» Later the text notes that one proposal is «less radical»
than the
other.
The High Court confirmed that just because native
title has different characteristics from
other forms of
title and derives from a different source, it does not mean it can be given less
protection than other forms of
title.
The Report suggests the Taskforce paid little attention to native
title issues
other than protection of heritage.