New Jersey's highest court has considered whether state constitutional
protections for free speech apply to a private homeowners» association enforcement of its rules and regulations against fellow homeowners.
Too often,
protections for free speech and innovation are seemingly forgotten as soon as someone cries «infringement.»
When someone in the U.S. communicates something to someone outside the U.S. that does not have the same level of
protections for free speech that the U.S. does, there are federal statutes that provide that a judgment obtained there is not enforceable in the United States.
Such groups have claimed that federal hate crimes laws will silence preachers, ignoring those laws» robust
protections for free speech and religious expression, as well as the experience in the many states with such protections already in place.
Continuing on his meme of a few weeks ago, blogfather Volokh takes a long look at Sweden's incomplete
protection for free speech (in this case, a «hate speech» against homosexuality), and provides a little historical perspective for a logic - based (and refreshingly non-PC) reality check:
Not exact matches
When the U.S. Muslim community sounds out LOUD and CLEAR, without equivocation, and immediately against all forms of terrorism, including all aggressive religious intolerance
for human rights, women's right, children, equal
protection under the law, the respect
for other religions to coexist, the right to
free speech, and the ability to separate church from state, IF THEY FINALLY DO THAT AND LOUDLY, then we will begin to feel comfortable that they are truly embracing American ideals and here to join us, not to oppose, defy, or undermine what we hold dear.
Free speech and all the other
protections of our constitution were meant
for the loyal citizens of the United States and their honorable foreign guests.
«It is a version of an appeal
for the
protection of
free speech, and in this case it is a demand that the
speech of particular persons carry the authority to define the structure of reality without regard to the basis of past decisions.
Instead, the order entitled «Promoting
Free Speech and Religious Liberty» professes to extend political
speech protections for pastors and religious organizations, aiming to let them talk about politics without penalty.
Isn't it odd a news organization which insists on «
free speech»
protection for itself doesn't
for others?
But
free speech does not mean
protection from backlash and people standing up
for what's right.
BY ARTHUR S. LEONARD The seven - member Ohio Supreme Court unanimously rejected a
free speech and equal
protection challenge to the state's law making it a felony assault
for a person who knows he is HIV - positive to engage in «sexual conduct» with another person without disclosing their HIV - positive status.
«Faculty at private colleges and universities lack the constitutional
protection of
free expression in their workplace because the First Amendment doesn't cover
speech at work
for private institutions,» he said.
The First Amendment guarantees
free speech and a
free and unrestrained press as the primary
protections for ensuring a diverse marketplace of ideas in support of an informed citizenry.
In Casey v. West Las Vegas Independent School District (2007), Gorsuch ruled on
free -
speech protections for employees within the school district setting.
Saunders even unsuccessfully sued Parker in federal court last year, charging that Parker violated his
free -
speech protections by barring him from speaking publicly
for the union.
More often than not, the light signifies no more than a turning or a twist or a light vent in a tunnel, which
for the vast majority of societies in the West will seemingly never end in the sunlight of a vital, dynamic, and responsible system of
free speech in the legal domain, a system that responds to the needs of a democratic society and also responds to the
protection of certain other vital interests of the individual in a humane society.
The United States has a long and proud history of legal
protection for reading privacy, and the California Constitution has especially strong privacy and
free speech protections.
And in regards to the efforts of Rudy Giuliani, Cotick wants, ``... to thank Mayor Giuliani, who has dedicated his life to the
protection of citizens against terrorists like Manuel Noriega and today
for defending
free speech.»
I'm not against the use of Mortal Kombat footage
for hilarity purposes (and I thought that this «Floridal Kombat» segment was very funny), but I do think it's odd
for The Daily Show to cite Mortal Kombat as an example of a game that is so distasteful that it should invalidate the medium's
free speech protection while also using the same game
for its comedy needs.
In addition to the constitutional claims you might expect here —
for violations of the students» rights to
free speech,
free exercise of religion and equal
protection — the complaint contains a Fourth Amendment claim based on an illegal seizure of the «rubber babies.»
«Spying on everyone's internet histories and email, text and phone records with no suspicion of serious criminal activity and no basic
protections for our rights undermines everything that's central to our democracy and freedom — our privacy,
free press,
free speech, protest rights,
protections for journalists» sources and whistleblowers, and legal and patient confidentiality.
This is unlike the United States where over half the States have specific anti-SLAPP legislation and First Amendment rights to
free speech that provide rules
for the better
protection of the right to protest and speak out against government agencies and corporations.
«I am particularly concerned at the tightening of the space
for free speech at a time where its promotion and
protection should be of the utmost importance,» said the Special Rapporteur on freedom of expression, David Kaye.
For the moment, Facebook has removed certain groups which violate its TOS but allowed those who do not violate its TOS to remain, citing Facebook's commitment to the
protection of
free speech.
In a December 8, 2014 ruling, U.S. District Court Judge Beth Bloom concluded that it violates the First Amendment's
protection of
free speech for The Florida Bar to prevent a lawyer from using past results in advertising their services in certain media.
We have handled lawsuits
for Facebook in more than 85 separate countries, successfully handling cutting - edge issues involving digital media, privacy, data
protection,
free speech, regulatory and more.
In a December 8, 2014 ruling, U.S. District Court Judge Beth Bloom concluded that it violates the First Amendment's
protection of
free speech for The Florida...
[63] This guidance from the Supreme Court explains that the
protection of
free speech is not intended to be at the expense of a wrongfully defamed person's ability to obtain a civil remedy
for the tort of libel.
But if a member union takes a particular pro-
free-
speech view, it does seem odd that the AFL - CIO — which has long benefited from
free speech protections, and has long fought
for broadening such
protections — would label that view «troubling and extreme.»
But if Facebook commits to minimizing these false positives, the result could better
protection for democracy and civil society compared to the alternative of knowingly allowing false news to proliferate in the name of
free speech.
While both bills have the laudable goal of curbing sex trafficking, including of minor children, they would greatly weaken Section 230's
protections for online
free speech and innovation.