Sentences with phrase «prove creationism»

You can not prove creationism, it is blending science (facts and methods) with faith (believing in something for which you don't have tangible proof nor an ability to prove merit).

The fact that certain mechanisms are not fully understood does not disprove evolution and it especially does not prove creationism.

@Veritas «The fact that certain mechanisms are not fully understood does not disprove evolution and it especially does not prove creationism.

I would love for you to Prove Creationism without using the Bible.

It is completely scary and hilarious that the country I live in and the people that surround me every day are so STUPID they will just toss out all scientific studies just to believe some book and so called fake scientist that try to prove creationism.

So, I'm sure the next reply is that science doesn't prove Creationism with 100 % certainty either.

No one can prove creationism or evolution which does prove Nye is a jerk for coming out with such a preposterous video.

The pathetic thing is even if you could prove evolution wrong you would be no closer to proving creationism true.

It is christians who are out attempting to impose their views (ie: denial of gay rights b / c their book apparently says so; denial of women's rights; using the threat of hell; teaching dis - proven creationism to innocent children) on the public.

It's proven creationism wrong at every turn and the reason you don't apply the word «miracle» the creationism is because the church allows you to willfully ignore evolution in favor of another side.

Not exact matches

This faith is either in evolution (molecules to man theory not proven, but only mans» speculation at best) or creationism (God / intelligent designer as described in Bible).

You are comparing things that I see as two different categorys.One is using a record recorded in the bible, for determining creationism, (or what caused the «big bang» as some believe) in regards to science, and what can be proven, in that respect.

Because evolutionary biology has proven that we in fact evolved from monkey's, you are actually supporting the contention that Science, not creationism concocted by man, is correct.

sqeptiq... That was a wonderfully «crafted» piece of «creative» writing... Hence, you have proved that you are indeed «made in the image» of the God who CREATED you... Your post reflects (and demands) creationism... unless you are now going to tell me that those words got there by «accident»...?

Ok we cant deny it anymore the church said, so lets say GOD created evolution but we will not calll it evolution because thats just is admitting that science was right, lets call it Smart design, and so creationism was born, its no surprise that any great discovery gets hijacked and twisted and changed to fit with the religious when so long before proven it gets denied by the same people.

Creationism is proven by man.

While his theory may take billions of years to verify, creationism has no basis in reality and can never be proven.

To get a gauge of just how inane the belief in creationism / intelligent design is in the 21st Century, here are some areas they must ignore, any one of which proves beyond rational argument that, not surprisingly, the World did not start about 6,000 years ago at the behest of the Judeo - Christian god, with one man, one woman and a talking snake.

Science has explored the creationism claims but it is hard to prove a negative there is no evidence to support it.

It should be the theory of creationism since there is no way to prove or disprove that hypothesis.

So logically it voids their assumptions and proves unequivocally that creationism fosters great thinkers, Scientists.

you just proved that creationism is not real.

He's just saying creationism has been proven completely false.

The article doesn't «prove» creationism.

Just because creationism is not proven with data of this generation, doesn't mean that data from another may prove otherwise.

Thats all fine and dandy except with science you need to try and experiment and recreate those events to help prove the theory of creationism.

Faith in his doing is the only path to creationism — since it can not be proven by scientific means.

No, the premise that creationism is false (which is proven) is different from the notion that God does not exist or is «bad» for children.

A few of the scientific and academic societies that have issued public statements acknowledging evolution is proven and / or rejecting creationism / intelligent design:

But you would still have a problem, because proving evolution wrong does not mean creationism is right by default... you would still need to prove that.

It's okay to believe in creationism while at the same time accepting what is proven.

Science is not starting with an idea (in this case God / creationism) then setting out to prove it right.

To give it any real credence creationism needs to be proved first, then you must prove that it was a god, then that it was the god who inspired people to write the bible, and then finally prove that that was what was meant in the text.

For many of us, fighting the good fight of faith meant proving to skeptics that young earth creationism was scientifically sound, that the Battle of Jericho was an historical fact, and that believing in God was a perfectly rational and reasonable thing to do.

Of course there are many Religious Right advocates that do not accept historic or scientific facts and believe in Creationism over proven Evolution, believe the earth is 5000 years old instead of Billions reguardless of the fossil and rock record.

Since (b) s simultaneously affirm their scriptures, and hence, if they were consistent, by your reasoning should believe in creationism, we have an inconsistent or self - contradictory group which proves that the doctrine under question is what you call CD or Culturally Determined.