There is much that could be said
about this, but I will stick with one thing, based on discussion at
about the 2 minute mark: When atheists insist that
atheism does not drive behavior, and then then campaign on behalf of
atheism, ridicule religion and religious believers in the name of
atheism, seek to change laws in favor of their atheistic positions, recommend the extermination of religion, and practice falsehoods like Dawkins's in support of
atheism, they
prove that their
atheism drives their behavior and that their premise is false, disingenuous, and (as far as I can tell) useless for anything but giving
atheism rhetorical cover from being implicated in atheists» atrocities.
the fact that the respondant lies
about this being a political effort,
proves that the platform of
atheism is built on a foundation of lies.