Sentences with phrase «prove anything wrong»

Your math is correct, but it doesn't prove anything wrong with the article.

I see no poster in this thread has proven anything wrong with those algebraic proof steps especially original poster Robert Brown.

Not exact matches

After her proven success in making changes, the pressure is on for companies to respond quickly — even if they insist they aren't doing anything wrong.

Let me see you proclaim one more time that there has never been anything proved wrong in the bible.

My view is that the bible has been proven wrong on so many points that I would never consider it a source of information on anything.

SeaVik, No, the Bible has not been proven wrong in anything that it speaks upon.

If I have been incorrect in anything that I state, then you have my humble apologies, and please, prove me wrong from scripture.

niknak I would give up if science could prove one thing just one thing wrong about anything Jesus did or said.

When anyone can proclaim a religious belief without any way of proving them «wrong», then it's «anything goes» and your argument becomes full of holes.

And you didn't answer my question either And what are you even talking about, I don't believe that there is anything false in the Bible, prove me wrong

lol, i may very well be wrong — but you are not doing a very good job at proving your stance... you seem more mad then anything in your words... maybe thats just me, but whatever — as far as the fair housing laws — as long as the condo mannagers don't allow anything like that from anyone they are not in volation of the law — but she break the contract she signed and that is that.

Anything the bible says is wrong for society has always proven to be wrong.

One of the reasons I come here is to see if anyone can produce anything to prove us wrong... I do not like the idea of «no god», but I am not going to cling to fantasy, either.

That's my opinion and you haven't said anything to prove me wrong or given me any reasons as to why that piss poor match was watchable.

Goodness knows what will happen, gut feeling is we might get Pedro, I can't see anything else happening, but I'd love to be proved wrong!!!

lol» and im a giroud fan» but looking at every other team around the world now i mean seriously wenger if atletico madrid and dortmund gonna have better strikers than u have then just do nt promise me anything that wont happen as by far its only sanchez and nothing else... plzz prove me wrong as i do nt want to live the same shit all over again... striker..

This «he doesn't do anything» accusation has been used against Ozil ever since he signed for Arsenal and it has been proven over and over again by the stats to be wrong.

I don't think there's anything wrong with the character of our group, in fact I know there isn't because they prove it every single day.

I can not believe anything good anymore i hope they prove me wrong in a big way, if we want i believe we can still keep Sanchez by buying top class players to show him and us that Arsenal means business and not by sniffing

Don't get me wrong, I don't have anything against Akpom / Afobe, they just haven't proven themselves yet, they may become brilliant, but right now, we need class!

in this case i don't see AW doing anything wrong other then telling us the fans porky pies again, i think JW was injured for far too long and he could get injured again soon, if AW gave him a chance to prove himself until the summer then his being a decent manager considering JW injury history, and yes clubs will surround JW like flies to shi7 now that his looking good and playing good, what JW has to understand is that we paid his salary for ages while he was injured

I don't think there's anything intrinsically wrong with that, although it will be hard to prove that that's what really happened.»

I really / honestly don't expect anything from here, but I'm here and you are more than welcome to prove me wrong....

Hudgens hasn't really done anything wrong per se, but she certainly hasn't proved herself as a leading lady yet.

His wife, Carol (Miller, Thanksgiving Family Reunion), thinks he can never do anything spontaneous, which spurs him to think of something to prove her wrong.

Around 2007, just when most people were starting to think you couldn't find anything in the publishing world worse than a typical vanity press, Author Solutions proved us all wrong.

I don't believe this is anything more than my personal opinion, you can take it for what its worth which is exactly why I stated you could prove me wrong in the article.

The Justice Department may have a hard time proving that Apple really did anything wrong.

If anything, it really awoke something inside of me — something which was already awake, but now even more so — that I really needed to prove this guy wrong.

I would like to see factual evidence to prove Rich wrong because clearly Yoshida hasn't even said anything intellectual just «so stupid».

When I was the age that many kids today are who are playing games like GTA and COD, I was never allowed to play nor see anything that was age rated for adults because my parents felt I needed to learn about life first and to know the fine line between reality and fiction and right and wrong, I never got to play my first adult rated game till I was 17 and had proven that I was mature enough to not copy anything from the game, that game was Eternal Champions on the Mega Drive, fun game, but tacky.

Nintendo's new console has proven that there isn't anything wrong with a little bit of pick up and play.

Whether it was controls proving to be totally unresponsive or the fact that I'd randomly spin out for no apparent reason; I always felt as if anything could go wrong and it wouldn't be my own fault.

This is not to prejudge whether the data will prove one side right or wrong but no one can claim to have proved anything so long as any part of what they assert as proof is opaque.

The call for emails is not to investigate anything scientific, otherwise they would have looked at the data itself to try to prove it wrong.

It is very difficult for students to prove their lecturers wrong about anything and expect to get decent grades.

You need to drop the idea that a consensus of anything in science research will establish the truth.It is NOT a rational, or valid way to determine something that was originally conjectured to explain something.It can take just ONE person to prove everybody else wrong.

@geronimo: Forgive me if I've misunderstood what you were trying to prove, but thanks for sharing your data with the skeptics, it's surely a good way of proving it correct if the «enemy» can't find anything wrong with it.

Nobody is obligated to prove that your method is wrong, or to come up with a «better» model that doesn't relate to anything meaningful anyway.

«I'm prepared to accept whatever result they produce, even if it proves my premise wrong... the method isn't the madness that we've seen from NOAA, NCDC, GISS, and CRU... That lack of strings attached to funding, plus the broad mix of people involved especially those who have previous experience in handling large data sets gives me greater confidence in the result being closer to a bona fide ground truth than anything we've seen yet.

The fact you made an incorrect citation does not burden me with an association with them nor prove anything else they say right or wrong — even the.07 reference itself.

««Consensus» Prediction of Atmospheric Scientists In 2002 Proven Wrong A Few Years Later: Can They Predict Anything Correctly?

Or does the person who says it's statistically impossible for thousands of highly trained modern scientists, using the same time honored and proven forms that all other scientists do to get anything 100 % wrong....

The government will force a carbon tax on people and pull more money out of the real economy to spend as they see fit on more Solyndra type investments and when the cold hits and stays proving AGW was dead wrong they will not apologize or refund anything.

If you then widen your «likely range» to include almost anything, you are untouchable... you can NEVER be proven wrong.

Being Politically Correct Has Terrible Consequences Main «Consensus» Prediction of Atmospheric Scientists In 2002 Proven Wrong A Few Years Later: Can They Predict Anything Correctly?»

There is no such mechanism on a blog that is read by a bunch of agenda - driven zealots looking for anything that would prove climate scientists wrong.

Apart from the irony of using a Deltoid blog to try and show that those two suffer from «ideological blinkers» (don't get me wrong, I enjoy Deltoid, in good part because he is so honest about where he is coming from that I know where I stand), the posts you link to in no way show an inescapable conclusion of ideology as far as I can see, and I stand by my position of incomprehension that you would discount anything those two say on grounds of proven ideological bias.

At that point those favoring the «good cause» begin to find problems that do not exist, are not worth trying to regulate, or are so poorly understood that anything «accomplished» is likely to prove the wrong answer.

You are not proving that the other party did anything wrong.