Sentences with phrase «prove general claims»

Examples do not prove general claims.

Not exact matches

He never claims that general revelation can prove the additional and indispensable truths of special revelation; he only claims that rejection of the former prevents reception of the latter.

As a general rule, the spouse claiming a deduction on the federal return must be able to prove that he or she actually paid the underlying expense.

On a more general point, uninformed commentators often refer to periods in the past when it was warmer, then claim that this somehow «proves» that contemporary changes are «normal».

Here, «it was very well known» and «proved by countless experiments» and the general «handwave to the past authority of Arrhenius / Tyndall / Fourier», enough to «prove they were right», while refusing to fetch any of these claimed empirical studies — those denying the Dogma were being successfully marginalised further by this wave of supercilious blocking of arguments from AGWs all the while they were hypocrically proclaiming their repulsion to the blocking of discussion on the science and objecting to the malpractices such as hiding open access of data.

«Reports that Exxon Mobil will reduce its proved reserves by about 20 % have caused great excitement, coming after New York Attorney General Schneiderman's claims that the company might have misled investors about the impact of climate change on its reserve valuation....

Such claims are considered so obviously harmful that malice need not be proved to obtain a judgment for «general damages,» and not just specific losses.

I am a student at university studying general sciences and a colleague of mine claims that ice core samples prove that the earth is much warmer than in the past (in particular before the industrial revolution).

In general, a plaintiff has the burden to prove all four elements in a Connecticut personal injury claim.

While there are a few situations that won't qualify for a personal injury claim, the general rule is that if someone else was responsible and it can be proven, you can file for damages to compensate your losses.

Strict liability means that the injured victim is not required to prove that the manufacturer was negligent which is, in general, the typical standard for personal injury claims.

The repairs «unquestionably involved the same «general subject matter» as the contract» and, therefore, the contractor could not recover in quantum meruit even though it had little chance of success on proving its contract claim for the extra work.

Special damages for pecuniary loss are rarely claimed in libel actions and are often exceedingly difficult to prove, resulting in them being grouped with general damages.

For a claim to be misleading, it must be proven that: (i) a representation (i.e., an advertising or marketing claim) has been made, (ii) to the public, (iii) to promote a product or business interest, (iv) that is literally false or misleading (or with a false or misleading general impression) and (v) the claim is «material».

Do not make general claims, but make sure that you quantify your achievements with statistics or numbers to prove such claims.

Tags for this Online Resume: relentless negotiator, Connected to Heavy Highway Industry decision makers, General Manager / Division Manager, Proven team leader, Innovative Executive, Claims Specialist

A proven performer with 25 + years» experience and accomplishments reflecting proficiency in Auto and Home Owner Liability, Workers» Compensation, General Liability claims management.