Sentences with phrase «prove nothing at»

Even if one could prove beyond a doubt that the miracle stories are literally true, this would prove nothing at all except that these things happened.

And they prove nothing at all to conspiracy theorists.

so you can quote a few heretics, proves nothing at all.

talking point... it really proves nothing at all one way or another, IMO.

As I emphasise this is negative information, which proves nothing at all.

Not exact matches

Scott Tranter, a founder of the data - analytics firm Optimus who was on the data team for Republican Sen. Marco Rubio's 2016 presidential bid, told Business Insider that the psychographic modeling that Cambridge Analytica touted «isn't proven science» and that that was at least partially why some thought the service was nothing special.

EDMONTON — In breaking the PC promise to ensure that high ranking officials employed by Alberta's boards and agencies are covered by sunshine rules, Prentice is proving that nothing has changed under his management and his PC government will continue to protect the high salaries of government friends and insiders at the expense of transparency and accountability, said NDP Leader Rachel Notley.

NDP leadership for years under Jack Layton and Tom Mulcair had proven effective at keeping the party's more extreme wings either mollified or at bay, and will repeatedly assert that Corbyn and Sanders have split their parties and have so far won precisely nothing.

(And you are one too unless you have been to every corner of the universe to prove it one way or the other) Nothing else has anything at all to do with a God being real or not.

If nothing else, the haters will think we are going at each other in blood sport for their amusement but it might prove educational.

Muslims are barbaric evil people and they have proven that they will stop at nothing for their cause.

So the question is how, based on aquinas argument, can one prove that at one time there was nothing.

Christians have been against science in the beginning because science always ends up proving a strange occurrence has nothing to do with God at all and can be explained with science.

BobG, if you are so adept at science and logic you should know that nothing can be proven.

Al Cruise at least had a sporting shot at it — and so gave me the chance to show that it was at least as easy to prove * that nothing happens to a person after their death.

Nothing with such a subsistence ceases to exist by the perishing of the body, and therefore there is in the human being that which thinks and understands which does not cease to exist at death, and which I have proved in Chapter XIII - XIV to be the principle of unity of the whole human being, the soul.

«We are in the middle of a study on church history at IF: Equip right now,» said Allen, the author of Restless and Nothing to Prove said.

Conservatives cherry - pick those passages that support their conservative view of God based on their conservative ego, and vice versa, where liberals are concerned... and there is NO way to ascertain which is true, except on a wholly subjective, personal level, thus it will never be proven objectively, since Spirit, by it's very nature, has absolutely nothing at all to do with the flesh and whatever seems to be happening on this earth, because Spirit is completely opposite, and therefore invisible to the naked human eye, being of the mind only, and therefore unprovable.

You are grasping at straws to prove that «nothing» exists.

In their pursuit of that goal, the show's many nefarious characters repeatedly prove they'll stop at nothing to attain it.

@tallulah13 The Greek gods were made in the image of men by men, some, Hercules for example was a man.The living God made man in His image.You choose, but if you continue to avoid honest debate I'll quit replying to you.There are many examples of proven Bible truths, the Greek b.s you brought up just confuses the real issue and adds nothing to the conversation.You know it, I know it, so does any thinking person.Focus on the topic at hand or go elsewhere.

If God's existence is not a factual question at all, then obviously nothing about the world and the experience of it could possibly either disprove his existence or prove it.

Thus he asserts that «nothing can be proven at all» (p98) about God by reason — a point that he doesn't really prove (perhaps because postmodernism denies that reason can prove such things).

i see no proof of your statements, at least science has the integrity to admitt to whatever being only a theory and not fact — your BELIEF is nothing but a thought you hold on to like a baby and there special blanky... sceince attempts to prove or even to disprove itself, you just go on believing what some silk covered so called humble man with gold in his pockets tells you.

Matter does not create from nothing; it is other matter just reconfigured, even at the quantum sub-atomic level — we just aren't smart enough, to understand that enough to prove it yet with scientific equations — so we say it is unpredictable, rather than we haven't figured the logic out yet.

Standing back, then, amid the mob, She saw the white square had been daubed With the pained portrait of his looks, As if to prove, in every prayer Our airy words melt at his stare, And his words jotted in our books Are nothing to the fact of flesh, The thorn - pricked head, the eyes impressed Upon a piece of woven cloth.

As Ramsey traced the development back, he finally reached the point that proved, for me, telling and decisive: that there is nothing we have now, genetically, that we did not have when we were that zygote, no larger than the period at the end of this sentence.

If one will look a little more closely, I have not much doubt that in the whole world one will not find a single analogy (except a later instance which proves nothing), if it stands fast that Abraham is the representative of faith, and that faith is normally expressed in him whose life is not merely the most paradoxical that can be thought but so paradoxical that it can not be thought at all.

Unless you can prove otherwise we just die, that's it, nothing more as far as we know at this time.

Investigate the evidence yourself, there is nothing at all that truly suggests that the Big Bang happened, the only thing they have used in order to come up with the theory is that in their observances, the Universe appears to be expanding from a central point, it doesn't prove that a Big bang occurred, we know so little about the universe, that we don't even know everything about our own world, and you really believe that our science has figured out the riddle to the beginning of the Universe?

Here is my evil plan — Create a fictional character, have him born into poverty in a part of the world full of strife with no recorded history, cast some doubts on his conception (that will keep them guessing), leave a decade or so gap in his life story, re-introduce him in the middle of nowhere and tell everyone he has all these amazing powers, he confounds and confuses all his followers and tells them not to tell anyone about what he does or where he is going and Oh yeah, they are all prostiitutes and tax cheats and lepers and the really lowlifes of society, deny them the chance to follow him, set him at odds with both the government and the church powers of his time, cast doubts on his seexuality and intelligence, make it so he refuses anyone to come to his aid and kill him in the most horrible way imaginable, then hide his body, make it so nothing he does can be historically proven.

There was nothing at stake but pride when two slightly tarnished giants, Miami and Notre Dame, squared off in Florida, but that proved incentive enough to produce a thunderous battle and a thrilling Irish win

Nothings changed, Wenger is still proving he's miles away from being an adequate manager at this level.

The first Aussie to win at Augusta has nothing to prove, which will free him and his chest putter to play as if nothing of import depended on the outcome.

Until Floyd proves he can stay healthy through at least, say, 14 games, we have 3 rotational guys and nothing behind them.

With nothing left to prove as an amateur, at 19 Ramos turned professional.

The # 29m summer signing proved his talent and potential at the Etihad, but has been nothing short of woeful since, and was fairly dropped for the Anfield draw to West Brom on Sunday.

Play players that will play for our crest, Chelsea game proved that and just put out them, I said in summer arsenal want dries mertens and got nothing but thumps down I've got fantastic source was told arsenal will get him next summer but only stop is we got ta get bk in champions league we need go on run next few woks and we need beat Everton which is our next real tough fix, just look at da ox it's a mistake he went apparently he promised he's girl that he go Liverpool that why he took pay cut well grass is not always greener we need play same as at Chelsea and keep winning and get buzz really going let's beat wba and I'd play jack for da game we don't need Cdm for wba at home let's get goals lacasette get couple

he was also not slow in Bringing back former manager Mourhino - a man with a proven pedigree and understanding of the modern game — Abramovich takes no prisoners he wants to win — While Chelsea continue to sweep aside all in their path, Abramovich stops at nothing to achieve football success!

I have nothing against unknown and unestablished players but — they at least need to be young and they should be bought for cover first and if they prove themselves then 1st team.

At the moment, our Welsh wizard can do nothing wrong and his 2013/2014 season at Arsenal has proven MANY people wrong, including myselAt the moment, our Welsh wizard can do nothing wrong and his 2013/2014 season at Arsenal has proven MANY people wrong, including myselat Arsenal has proven MANY people wrong, including myself.

All this «Wenger plays his card close to his chest» malarkey is just an excuse, The press do spin stories when they have nothing else to talk about BUT there's a grain of truth is all of them, it's as plain as that, last year the press had an inkling about Sanchez coming to u and thus it was proved a I've said many times on here Wengers statement prior to the end of the season are clear if you look back at what he said going back season after season, He said That Olivier Giroud WAS in his opinion good enough to fire Arsenal to PL glory.

lol» and im a giroud fan» but looking at every other team around the world now i mean seriously wenger if atletico madrid and dortmund gonna have better strikers than u have then just do nt promise me anything that wont happen as by far its only sanchez and nothing else... plzz prove me wrong as i do nt want to live the same shit all over again... striker..

What someone should have pointed out at the meeting, is that it's really nothing to do with the money... as last season proved.

You will get no abuse from me if you disagree but this is a culture at our club created by a man that has nothing to prove to those that matter... No not us the fans but the Directors.

Giroud has nothing to prove at Arsenal.He has been in many for many seasons and has done totally nothing as a striker.

I think Ozil has the same problem as Torres and Andy Carroll Syndrome BIG PRICE TAG big expectation in their mind, Ozil has nothing to prove at Real but here new club new country new Medea and so on.

Jones also has nothing to prove at LHW, and no title defense record to chase, so I would've been far more interested in seeing him gun for the HW belt.

I look at quality and proven ability, to argue Theo / Giroud / Coquelin are better than those mentioned is nothing more than overstating what currently plays for us.

Miller said the injury proved especially difficult for Matta, who was a fitness freak who'd think nothing of running 10 miles before coming into the office when they worked together at Miami University (Ohio) in 1994 - 95.