Sentences with phrase «prove nothing other than»

In fact, your silly questions prove nothing other than your lack of understanding of evolution and the beginning of life.

Just in case you were wondering, the bible proves nothing other than that there were some sheep herders that managed to write down their fables.

And so the evidence that Christians continue to present as «proof» of their god is either the earliest fragments of these same man - written stories (proving nothing other than that someone wrote the stories down!)

That book proves NOTHING other than the fact that people desired to have some sort of explanation for how the world and universe work and wanted to have some sort of ethical framework upon which to base their lives.

Which of course proves nothing other than human's gullibility.

They're not going to win and they'll be proving nothing other than they will be blamed for having that creep in office for a another two years.

Not exact matches

I'm certain the crucifixion itself proves nothing — hundreds of people were crucified, after all, and none of their deaths proved anything other than that people can come up with some really cruel ways to kill each other.

We need no further evidence, in my view, to prove scientifically that the social in - folding which we are undergoing is nothing other than the direct and logical extension, over our heads, of the process of cosmic in - folding which gave birth to the first cell and the first thought on earth.

Could it be that the two sides are more like each other than we care to admit??? LOL, why didn't they put the money they used to put up the billboard to prove without a shadow of a doubt that it is a myth and nothing in the bible actual happened since it's all about reason and science so we can put all the speculation to bed.

If one needs to proclaim his or her way better than any other's, it does nothing to prove value to his or her lack of belief in anything bigger than he or she.

Matter does not create from nothing; it is other matter just reconfigured, even at the quantum sub-atomic level — we just aren't smart enough, to understand that enough to prove it yet with scientific equations — so we say it is unpredictable, rather than we haven't figured the logic out yet.

All this proves is that you care about nothing other than appeasing the imaginary... a sincere insult to humanity.

i - ll, WHY IS THAT GOD»S FAULT, AND HOW DOES IT PROVE ANYTHING OTHER THAN THAT THERE IS A CONSTANT BATTLE BETWEEN GOOD, SENSIBLE, LOGICAL, ORDERLY AGAINST EVIL, INSANE, REBELIOUS, DISORDERLY, HOW DOES THE AURORA INCIDENT PROVE THAT GOD DOES NOT EXIST, SINCE OUT OF NOTHING NOTHING HAPPENS, AND NOTHING CAN BE DISTROYED INTO OR FROM NOTHING?

lol» and im a giroud fan» but looking at every other team around the world now i mean seriously wenger if atletico madrid and dortmund gonna have better strikers than u have then just do nt promise me anything that wont happen as by far its only sanchez and nothing else... plzz prove me wrong as i do nt want to live the same shit all over again... striker..

When Samuel commented on why it was wrong to sell Lucas Perez you brought up stats between Walcott and Perez and in that you proved using the stats why Walcott is better.If Wenger didn't have blond love for some of his players then why did he keep benching Perez when he was performing yet the average guys always got a look in the squad.So if there are stats which prove Walcott is better aren't there stats which also prove Perez is better?Think about that.You also said Perez is not as good as some of us make out.The funny thing is yesterday we had an argument on Giroud and I also tried to imply that Giroud is not as good as we make out and you opposed.You always kept bringing stats up to defend him.Do you know if Bendtner or Chamakh had scored 25 goals for Arsenal in any season they'd still have been regarded as average.You know why?Because quality has nothing to do with stats and is just a kind pf talent or state.It seems to me that you think you know it all.You also denied the fact that Wenger likes French players and that if Perez was French he wouldn't have been out in one season stating other players as examples.It seems to me that you deny things which are clear for everyone to see.If you think you know better than everyone go and teach Wenger how to win the trophy this season.

Analysis: As someone who genuinely appreciated the first «Transformers» movie and probably gave its sequel more of a pass than others, it's sad to say that Michael Bay has learned nothing from the criticism of «Revenge of the Fallen,» proving once again that given the budget, he'll do whatever he wants without giving a damn that people might actually pay to sit through it.

Unsuccessful deployments are nothing new in the digital signage sector (just a few years ago less than half of digital signage networks proved successful), a fact attributed to, among other things, project complexity.

I see nothing wring with ic3's list other than TItanFall is not a proven franchise yet.

You know what, even if the Arctic and Antarctic were melting away to nothing to much less, it wouldn't prove anything, other than that we have had some (probably natural) warming and / or cyclical phenomena.

Correlating an increase in hurricane intensity and / or frequency to global warming «proves» nothing other than a nebulous statistical relationship, if even that.

Finally, I've known a couple of Nobel Laureates and many other international gurus who accused each other of promoting junk science, that they had nothing useful to contribute, you stick to astronomy and we will stick to oil generation, you have nothing worthwhile to contribute, he never said that; it's a lie I have the paper here to prove it, let's face it other than physics there are a huge number of things that you know absolutely nothing about, get cycling Otto, shut up!

After all, one has a long history of growth and demonstrable strength, while the other has proved nothing, other than that it can be extremely volatile and unpredictable.