Hi, my name is Neji and I quote from my own bronze age book of beliefs to
prove said beliefs.
Not exact matches
That could
prove a perilous prospect for the ACA, based on the High Court's recent ruling in Hobby Lobby, which
said that closely - held companies can exempt themselves from key parts of their coverage requirements, such as for birth control products and services, based on their religious
beliefs.
Saying that God is real over and over just reinforces your
belief that he is, it doesn't actually
prove that he does exist.
Zeus on the other hand has been
proven real, he
said so himself and he
said everyone, all the other gods in other cultures are fakes...» = > upon what are you basing your positive
belief (you slipped up there in acknowledging atheism requires a positive disbelief in a diety
The reason I
say so is because theists for the most part do not claim to be able to
prove that there is a god — they simply assert their
belief to that end.
You can't not
say we have a set of
beliefs and ignore the practices part to
prove that atheism is a religion in of itself.
and being aware of your environment, being respectful of those of all
beliefs and none
beliefs, and of our world, and its about personal responsibility, with that
said why is is such a bad thing to believe in something greater than yourself, how can somebody live there life without believing in something, what kind of life is that, life is meant to be discovered, its one big mystery, and all the science in the world can still not
prove how we exactly came to be?
The respected Christian apologist and author, C.S. Lewis 1960 essay «The Worlds Last Night» «
Say what you like,» we shall be told, «the apocalyptic
beliefs of the first Christians have been
proved to be false.
Of course you can be
proven wrong... your holy book was written by man, no god involved; thus your
belief is based on the fairy tales told by men who saw a gullible fool a mile away - see, how easy that is??? As for the actual number being only 1.6 billion, sorry the stats
say different and your opinion on who the actual number includes is moot.
No
belief can be
proven even the most fundamental (e.g., you
say that there are laws of thermodynamics, and I
say that we might be in some very intelligent monster's dream and that all the «laws» here are made up by this monster.
If you turn it around you will find that Christians use their
belief in what others have
said to try to
prove to atheist that God exists.
You have the right to
say and think whatever you want, noone can change your
beliefs, but there is evidence that
proves that speciel has the capacity to change to select benificial traits over the course of many generations.
This is the concept of that beyond which thought can not go, in which it completes its search for understanding, at which it really affirms only itself, and through which it relates all else.2 Leaving aside his views on its historical character, this is what R. G. Collingwood seems to be suggesting when he
says that Anselm's argument does not
prove «that because our idea of God is an ideal of id quo maius cogitari nequit therefore God exists, but that because our idea of God is an idea of id quo maius cogitari nequit we stand committed to
belief in God's existence.
That's why this is called the «
Belief Blog» rather than,
say, the «
Proven Facts Blog.»
Only religion carves out a definition that
says its
beliefs and alleged but never
proven gods can not be
proven, measured, etc. but should be believed as if they are 100 % true, and not questioned.
And no a
belief does not mean actual knowledge, so when one proclaims a
belief, it something that by definition can not be
proven, so no I don't have to present evidence in order to declare a
belief, but if one is
saying outright that angels do not exist as being the absolute truth, then one should present evidence.
That is ALL that «atheist» means - the word
says nothing about a
belief that this
belief can be
proven.
If you can find a way to
prove to me that fusion doesn't fuel the sun, I can change my scientific
belief structure, that is what allows me to
say I live in reality while you float in the clouds with your invisible friend.
You have absolutely NO evidence the gospels are the truth... none... zero... we have
proven in couldnt be true via evidenced links to support our FACTS but you have only
belief from a a pedagogy passed down from generation to generation regarded as the trutth and believed by MILLIONS without EVER checking out the EVIDENCE that
says it CAN NOT be true.
but i didn't state anything example — i stated that the theory of evolution is yet to be
proved and so with that i agree that due to that lacking it is equal to the theory of god... the only thing i
said which is cemented truth for anything is that we don't know what the real answer is... and by stating ideas as facts serves no real purpose but a selfish one... lets call it an ease - ment on the inner self, the mind can now be at peace with the hope that when i die i get to live yet again... full
belief in this is insane without evidence.
It stands to reason that an all knowing eternal God could predict what you and I would believe no before He made and thus have already know whether we would except him or not And I'm not sure what you trying to
say by that And because we want to tell others about Him and be used by Him to reach others And that commit does not make any sense, but clearly God is not a punk, as I have already demonstrated And your main point, as I already explained is false No, but my
belief is true, none the less, it is by definition virtually impossible to
prove anything And no, I don't need knee pads.
Hitler was a
proven liar, nothing Hitler
said can be used as evidence to his
beliefs.
Still a
belief that CAN NOT be
proven no matter what internet atheist trolls
say.
In one quote she
says she can't
prove the facts of her
belief and in a second she
says the «church» has the facts on its side.
Was not trying to convince any one or
prove any thing but rather was reflecting our
belief for more understanding of Muslims
beliefs... as you
said some would read and mean nothing to them but some would read and rethink their
beliefs or store it in backbof their heads for another day when start thinking deep..
Therefore your self - satisfied knowledge of your religion only perpetuates your
beliefs, but does nothing to
prove anything you are
saying.
Your
belief in your opinion doesn't make it true, and
saying that others can not «disprove» your
beliefs is just another way of
saying that you can not
prove them.
George H. W. Bush declaring (while I was serving in the military, and just before he became president)
saying that atheists not only are not patriots, but they should not be citizens, and declared it was because we are one nation under god... a
belief that he can not
prove... he never apologized.
I have a problem with people imposing their
beliefs on others and
saying «this is the way it is and there is no other way»... I have a big problem with creationists who go against science and the proof of evolution, but I also have a big problem with people demanding that there is no God on people when it is yet to be
proved, and will probably never be
proved, that there is in fact, not a God.
Laughing — First of all, i'm not the only one that Knows the Big Bang theory does not hold weight and has many holes in it, many leading physicists do not believe in it, it's a Theory like you
said moron... I don't have to be the one to try and disprove it to you, Do your own research, the folks that work the most with the theory haven't staked their entire faith or
belief in it, because they know it's not
proven and it can not be
proven.
I have
said it for years (and recently Wenger in his own words has
proven me right when he has gone on record and stated that he has unsuccessfully bid for certain players), that the reason why we have missed many of the targets that we have gone for is not solely down to money, but the lack of
belief the prospective players have in Wenger.
Now, I didn't
say for one second that we can't challenge them at all, but to get so angry that you will our team to lose to
prove a point is delusional beyond
belief.
He
said: «It's always like that when you lose, fans have to
prove their
belief again.
While she refused to comment on the «disturbing» allegations, Rice came out more strongly,
saying that, if
proven true, the charges will confirm New Yorkers»
beliefs that there are two sets of rules — one for public officials and one for everyone else
He has many ideas and
beliefs which could well
prove to be popular in the climate we're in and yes, as I have
said before, people grew tired of the old way of the doing things in the Labour party where everything was over managed.
While most
say that blue and black don't go well with each other, you can trump this
belief and
prove otherwise!
Lastly, researchers
said, contrary to popular
belief, eagerness did not
prove to be a turn - off in the study, so respond promptly.
It is often
said that the best changes are «bottom up», in this case however the change will need to be «top down» with a lot of support in the form of critical friends for schools, to set in place systemic demands that override extant
belief systems to give the new system a chance to
prove its worth.
«It's our firm
belief that we can disseminate cold, hard facts to a critical mass without boring them to tears or using esoteric language often found in academic research and literature,» he
says, adding that documentaries have a
proven track record of success.
Maybe the head should
say Europe, but for many investors the US will instinctively remain their gut - call... Ironically, this investor preference might just
prove my case — because it obviously reflects a general
belief in & endorsement of the (apparent) success of the Fed's QE programme (s).
You
say: «Unlike AGW believers, I do not think there is a grand conspiracy to commit fraud about the climate... The errors are of the same sort one gets when
proving their religious
beliefs or political
beliefs.
You demonstrated you are a climafte cultists because you hold
beliefs and when asked questiosn about them, that you should have thought through yourself and be able to answer you used the usual method used by the cultists to avoid answering: you
said it's fact,
proven, and go find out, trust me, or things like that.