Sentences with phrase «prove this point well»

We think they prove our point better than anything else.

Several examples serve to prove this point well.

The variety of dogs used in the act proved his point well.

Not exact matches

The First 90 Days: Proven Strategies for Getting Up to Speed Faster and Smarter: «Eric Hellweg over at HBR said on Twitter this is one of their all - time best sellers,» Dickerson points out.

Which proves one point very well, authenticity sells.

Rather than just a gadget event, MWC is proving to be the meeting point where new and better ways of connecting people and things are coming to fruition.

We were obviously pointed to Medifast Weight Control Centers, a clinically proven weight loss program backed by over 20,000 - plus physicians in the U.S. as the best choice to expand into the U.S.

This would prove to be a good starting point for Tesla as it looks to move its Autopilot system to phase two.

Because people invest time on LinkedIn, a proven approach is to help your audience perform their jobs better, answer questions, and help address pain points.

This week is proving to be a critical turning point for the financial services industry, which is described in the terms of reference for the Hayne royal commission as systemically strong with the world's best prudential regulation and oversight.

At many points in this very unusual period (like 1988, 1996, 2003, and 2013) long - term bonds would have proven to be just as good a choice as stocks.

Last August, at the time of the announcement of the sale of the Washington Post, I noted that Washington Post Co. shares had proved a mediocre investment over the past two decades, trailing the S&P 500 by more than 2.5 percentage points on an annualized investment (although starting at the time Buffett began accumulating shares, in 1973, the performance was much better, with an estimated annual return of 11.5 %).

Well, to sum up today's call, we obviously had a good quarter, and we're optimistic about our second quarter as the reasons for our restored sell - through and momentum are simple: One, we've removed Session from our lineup and restored our proven HERO form factor, now with touch displays, to the $ 199, $ 299, $ 399 price points that GoPro's brand was built upon.

S&P finished on Thursday within 2 S&P points of last Friday's close, and NFP data could very well prove to be the catalyst that results in the surge back to new all - time highs.

Although it may sound strange, developing entire fictional characters with distinct behavior patterns, values, pain points, budgets, and even skill levels can prove a significant help in segmenting your market and targeting the types of visitors, leads, and customers that will best increase your website's economic output.

When someone becomes a new subscriber to The Wagner Daily, our nightly ETF and stock newsletter with exact entry and exit points for our best ETF and stock picks, we try hard to make sure they understand our disciplined and proven trend trading system.

It's just a shame that we haven't come to the point in society where it should be required that those who make decisions must meet certain, more highly regulated, fool proof, corruption resistant criteria proving their intellect and open mindedness as well as weeding out individuals with preconceived notions, racist, sexist or religiously or other discriminative views (even if they themselves don't believe they are discriminative in their beliefs... this happens more than many people realize) and overall ignorant minds.

Well,,,, There is no point that proves that random chance is involved.

Well, when they can prove that their «God» (whatever that is) exists and that He has given them that authority, I will stop laughing and pointing at them.

your immature, irrational and absolute blind remarks toward atheism have been proved that there is no rational argument beyond this point, I suggest you read my post to the fullest and absorb it's meaning, and continue to act like a civilized being, your behavior is not acceptable in any rational debate, you are not making yourself look good.

If those are the best examples of the attacks on Christians you just proved Primewonks point.

Very good Austin... try using another book to prove your point, otherwise your point is moot!

ZEKE — this is only to you — taking a part of a sentence to prove a point contrary to the point of the sentence is a fun game, get better.

My point here is that your ability to offer explanations as you have done here only proves one thing, that you are well versed on what's in your web.

As appropriate, I'm happy to share my views as well, but I must resist the urge to prove my point of view.

Good point Skip — I can't prove that you exist, although your silly responses would tend to support the view that you don't exists.

I think that many of them at one point believed in Jesus alone for eternal life, but over time, have come to accept the lies of religion that they need to have the performance and good works in order to keep or prove their eternal life.

Those who think God can not mean well toward us because he «sends» us suffering can prove their point only by showing that there is a way to run the universe, compatible with the existence of other real powers than just the supreme power, which would be more fully in accord with the totality of interests, or by showing that God sends us the suffering while himself remaining simply outside it, in the enjoyment of sheer bliss.

dreama proves the point quite well... he * absolutely * knows truths about the universe that no scientist can know.

Dear Martus, the trouble with lifting a piece of scripture out of the Holy Bible to try and prove a point is unacceptable and at best deceptive, that is how the Christians in South Africa justified apartheid using Genesis ch 9 v 25 when Noah cursed his son Ham and his descendants.

There are plenty of passages in the Bible that you can extract as well and use them to «prove a point.»

Yes and you continue to prove my point — going in circles to attempt to prove your «Word» is better than the next believer's «Word».

His parables frequently end with a «punch line» that presents a challenge to conventional expectation: the scorned Samaritan is the «good» one who proves neighbor to the victim on the Jericho Road; those who come to work late at the harvest are provided the same reward as those who toiled all day; the wayward prodigal son is the one who is feasted; the prayer of a repentant sinner is more acceptable to God than that of a righteous Pharisee.9 Shorter sayings make the same point: A camel could pass through a needle's eye more easily than a person of great wealth can enter into God's inbreaking realm (Mt 19:24).

Well, although I don't believe that there is any way to prove God nor do I think we will ever come particularly close even, I believe that the historical evidence in the form of copies of biblical manuscripts and the ancient towns archeologists have found that are in the Bible point to the Bible is a true authoritative book.

To prove a point, God thought it was alright to kill not only people, but animals as well.

Second, the extraordinary passion of Jefferson and Madison on this point was bitterly resisted by many in Virginia, as well as in other states, and in practice it proved nearly impossible to observe completely.

«1 Niebuhr said that he had been frequently challenged to prove that his interests were theological rather than practical, but, he said, «I have always refused to enter a defense, partly because I thought the point was well taken and partly because the distinction did not interest me.

But even if we could, such rudimentary indicators would still not speak to motive (my first point) so wouldn't ultimately be that helpful anyways in any attempt to prove who may be better (or act better) than others.

i agre with Dave and then some - christians (and other folks who are serious in their beliefs too) are comical, believing and praying to someone who can't be seen, can't be proven... (this is from the point of view of an empiricist, who is able to measure things) Christians (well, me for sure) are hypocrits - believing in fantastic ideals and guaranteed to continualy fall short - that is a fairly comical notion, but nonetheless, one I enjoy to continue to strive for - setting high ideals and striving towards them.

Well, once things for sure, you've more than proved my point about the conflicted nature of the over «40,000 denominations of insanity».

I find that science offers much better explanations for gravity, energy, emotions, evolution, the universe, and conscience, collaboration, photons, the evolution of eyes, and on and on it goes... I guess the point is... Prove that God exists, and we can talk.

Of which, the point I believe you have more or less proven is that Catholic doctrine as well as people people in general can be fallible.

see what you have to understand about living in a real world — a world where god is just a story and not real — its a world based on scientific and physical laws that are proven to exist and their effects are measurable... us as humans, mere animals, hold no real power or control aside thru ingenuity which allows us to change our environment to suit us... stay with me here... at this point in human history we ceased to change to suit our environment and started changing it to suit us — thats destruction of the earth to suit one species — that should go over well...

The moment he begins to stretch the facts to prove a point or to tell a good story from his imagination, at that moment he becomes a propagandist or perhaps a historical novelist, but he ceases to be a true historian.

I may as well quote the Harry Potter books to prove a historical point.

In films that make the point that God can bring good out of evil, there is always a danger of becoming facile and condescending — an unexpected blessing proves that it was all for the best, and the evil wasn't so bad to begin with.

Well, saying «God» caused the Big Bang is not necessarily in the realm of being able to prove one way or the other... at this point.

Well, Ted Haggard might just prove your point.

We've pointed out over and over again you are using reports from well known hate groups that the experts in this country have proven are false.

You are able to do it because you're a bisexual that's the point, trying to convert an actual gay person has been proven to be dangerous and detrimental to their overall well being.