Sentences with phrase «prove to anyone about»

We can rest because we don't have anything to prove to anyone about our identity — Jesus already did that.

Not exact matches

By finding people who already had proven track records, companies didn't have to worry about training anyone in - house.

In any case, I doubt anyone here is dumb enough to believe ten or twenty quotes proves something about «most» scientists.

Starting out with the fact that particle means dust anyone who is interested in proving the truth to themselves can do some research as to exactly what the BBT is all about and then compare it to the word that God gave us on the matter.

He lies to deceive, but he also lies about pointless things that anyone with an internet connection and access to Google can prove false within seconds.

It's not a matter of having to prove to anyone else that we care about someone, love them and share Jesus with them, just like we don't need to prove that we love our wife or our child.

I doubt anyone is buying your claim that you posted hostile things from names like Larry and Shawn to prove a point about message boards.

The clergy knows no more about God than anyone else, they prove it again and again by always being willing to talk but saying nothing of any use.

Here is my evil plan — Create a fictional character, have him born into poverty in a part of the world full of strife with no recorded history, cast some doubts on his conception (that will keep them guessing), leave a decade or so gap in his life story, re-introduce him in the middle of nowhere and tell everyone he has all these amazing powers, he confounds and confuses all his followers and tells them not to tell anyone about what he does or where he is going and Oh yeah, they are all prostiitutes and tax cheats and lepers and the really lowlifes of society, deny them the chance to follow him, set him at odds with both the government and the church powers of his time, cast doubts on his seexuality and intelligence, make it so he refuses anyone to come to his aid and kill him in the most horrible way imaginable, then hide his body, make it so nothing he does can be historically proven.

And just to prove how the southern teams never play in the cold, did anyone hear Leonard Fournette's concern about the Jags playing in Cleveland this week?

Anyone who think arsenal can win any trophy with Monreal as CB can wake up now, if Wenger persist with him in this position and does not buy a new CB, he will show he does not care about winning trophies.The results are there to prove it.

Only once he has proved himself should we even think about Viera becoming manager of Arsenal and the same should apply to anyone else.

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

Time and again, wenger has proven to anyone on this planet that he is not bothered about what people say.

But what can be done to ensure that a team like UCF — which was perfect, and which proved too late that it could beat just about anyone — has at least some path to the top?

«I don't think I have to prove to anyone how I feel about Arsenal and how loyal I am to this club.

He's proven over and over that his Administration is all about pay - to - play, meaning anyone who is doing work on the Buffalo Billion or the other State contracts is almost certainly a major contributor to Cuomo's campaigns.

Anyone who's ever channel surfed onto Fox News during one of the frequent occasions when a talking head attempts to prove the existence of God by his own amateur debunking of the Big Bang knows exactly what I'm talking about.

Men, learn how to listen and care about what the other person has to say, and women, stop looking back at your broken relationship or broken heart and trying to prove you don't need anyone.

But don't try to think about that you need to prove anything to anyone.

«I know for sure and from one of my most credible and proven sources (the one who told me about Metroid Prime 4 being developed by Bandai Namco before anyone else said or knew anything about that) is that Ridley is a newcomer, the game is, in fact, a sequel, but there will be assets being reused to some extent (s),» DasVergeben writes.

I know for sure and from one of my most credible and proven sources (the one who told me about Metroid Prime 4 being developed by Bandai Namco before anyone else said or knew anything about that) is that Ridley is a newcomer, the game is infact a sequel, but there will be assets being reused to some extent (s).

Heder creates a minor thriller out of it essentially, (especially for anyone sensitive about how babies are taken care of), but that proves to be a device most of all to put their bond on a time clock.

I always felt that the original Darksiders had a hell of a lot of potential, and when Darksiders II crashed onto consoles a few months back I was proven right, and so I immediately went and bragged about it to anyone that would listen.

So at the ending of the day I don't really believe that anyone needs to prove or give any type of evidence that games many times are not violent because I don't really believe that the argument nearly even needs to be about the violence and games as much as it's about that we already have a rating system for that type of content in the first place.

I'm unsure how to prove it though, I can't get into any issues by saying what I've heard, or what's common knowledge in the industry here (the common knowledge being that the project was taken from CC2 because it was so behind schedule), but if I were to name anyone working there, they'd get into trouble for sharing information, the same way I'd get into trouble if I shared information about where I work.

And the new Yale / George Mason poll, which is the first I have seen to prove the views of Tea Partiers, shows that Tea Party members (12 % of the public) feel they are very well informed about climate science and more than half think global warming will never hurt anyone.

Neither Gelbspan nor anyone repeating his accusation ever proved the money trail led to an industry directive to lie about global warming science; none of them have proved skeptic climate scientists were instructed to mimic tobacco industry tactics; journalists have demonstrably not offered overall fair balance in to skeptic climate scientists; the «wedge» being driven is one arguably pounded by enviro - activists who push the «skeptics don't deserve fair media balance» talking point; and Gelbspan was not the first one to bring up this talking point.

Steve Mosher, why should anyone in the industry employ Hockey Team member or likewise for their arctic endeavours, with the esoteric Hockey Stick shattered, sensitivity estimations currently falling apart, temperatures refusing to rise for over a decade and Watts / Evans about to prove that UHI in the US caused exaggerated trends by a factor of 2 or 3?

It is also possible that some of them might agree with the letter's unnamed author (s) that it's acceptable to dishonestly misrepresent the objective facts about climate science, but until that's been proven on an individual basis, I refuse to ascribe that level of ethical failure to anyone.

Not to mention the sordid, ugly tactics of the Union funded «GetUp» mob to silence anyone who seeks rationale debate and who espouses a few home truths about the so called proven Science.

Unless Ray or anyone else can prove to me that a 6 month old baby or a 3 year old child is 50 % or equally responsible for the communication process of a parent educating them about life's basics and who is in charge... & responsible for «communication»......?

This allows our firm to remain a step ahead of the opposition, a fact that should make anyone in need of proven representation confident about choosing to work with our firm.

US defamation law allows private persons to prove and recover actual damages using a negligence standard (rather than the more stringent actual malice standard) 172 on the basis that private persons are more vulnerable to injury than public figures and their reputations are more deserving of protection.173 That recognition is consistent with the argument advanced herein, namely that there is something qualitatively different about individuals who possess reputation as celebrity: their discursive power to yoke the media to their reputation - constructing ends.174 Discursive power is the ability not just to erect a website putting his or her version of the story online (which virtually anyone can now do), but also the ability to cause mass media outlets to devote attention to his or her side of the story.

Anyone who believes their lawyer has possibly committed malpractice is naturally going to have concerns about hiring another attorney to prove the malpractice.

There's much to admire about the Asus ZenBook Flip S. It's a light, slimline convertible laptop that will appeal to anyone who travels a lot, and proves that Asus can do more than simply cloning its rivals» designs.

When it comes to storage, the tablet is packed with 32 GB of space internally which should be enough to get just about anyone started, but should it prove to be less than what you need it supports up to 128 GB of expandable storage via microSD as well.

There are no statistics to prove that, but we know that people in this country love their families, care about their neighbours, and have pretty much the same emotions as just about anyone in any other country.