Sentences with phrase «prove to anyone at»

Not exact matches

Disappointed, but determined to defend our integrity, we immediately commissioned a comprehensive forensics audit that proved what we already knew to be true: (1) no material Tesla confidential information exists on our personal computers or company systems, and (2) there is no evidence that anyone at Aurora has used or has access to Tesla confidential information.»

As loathe as I am to use a physical world analogy because they often prove to be incorrect — potatoes at a buffet, anyone?

• The fiduciary rule: This will go into effect June 9 and requires anyone working with retirement dollars to act in the best interest of the client at all times, and be able to prove it, or face possibility of a lawsuit.

At the moment, I would much rather see the U.S. military intervene in Israel and Palestine to provide security for both peoples and the possibility of building a democratic and peaceful Palestinian state than engage in a highly personalized invasion of an «evil» country yet to be proven a threat to anyone.

I don't laugh at anyone for their faith or beliefs, there is no reason to until you can prove your belief or their believe to a 100 % no margin for error fault.

To think that anyone would be shocked at this person's allegations that they were «unaware of what was happening» proves he's either a very bad liar, or been living like an ostrich.

This same Jesus was crudified for the sins of he world and received up into glory... From that place at the right hand of Gdo he sat down expecting till all his enemies be made his footstool... I am his servant and I testify to you that he has filled me with his Spirit or if you like he downloaded himself; (his image in me) Christ dwells in me... near 34 years now... and I am building myself up into him... Because Christ lives greatly in me... I feel no need to force anyone to accept me... and I certainly need no one who like Bill can not discern the living God, yet... to defing to me what faith is... it is not an opinion because God has already proven himself to me... but Bill is free to his opinion... but I am goin got pray that God will be merciful to him and give him some proof... some pentecostal proof...

Look at the methods that have been solidly proven to work in a very effective manner, and then ask yourself why this should work this way without any regards to moral values of anyone involved.

Science can't prove that there isn't a magical purple elf from Jupiter with a furry green hat who appears in my apartment at night to sing Elvis Presley songs but who disappears whenever anyone else comes around.

Here is my evil plan — Create a fictional character, have him born into poverty in a part of the world full of strife with no recorded history, cast some doubts on his conception (that will keep them guessing), leave a decade or so gap in his life story, re-introduce him in the middle of nowhere and tell everyone he has all these amazing powers, he confounds and confuses all his followers and tells them not to tell anyone about what he does or where he is going and Oh yeah, they are all prostiitutes and tax cheats and lepers and the really lowlifes of society, deny them the chance to follow him, set him at odds with both the government and the church powers of his time, cast doubts on his seexuality and intelligence, make it so he refuses anyone to come to his aid and kill him in the most horrible way imaginable, then hide his body, make it so nothing he does can be historically proven.

The Bayern performance at home proved that we are a force but this demonstrated that we are a force to be reckoned with, a side that no - one wants to play against, a side by which if anyone switches off for a second, they will be forced to pay.

And finally we end up with players like Lucas Perez whom that arseholenger would not give any chance to prove himself, with all due respect to Perez he might be a good player, but definitely not an upgrade to anyone already at the club.

It's one of the things that drives him, even at the stage of his career where he really doesn't have anything to prove to anyone.

All of the above strikers are being linked (correctly or not) with other big clubs, the oe thing I don't see is Giroud being linked wih anyone at all!!!! That tells me a lot We don't need to lose OG but we do need another proven striker to add to the firing line and that's a fact proven by the performances this season.

If Monaco was Arsenal we would've also wanted to keep Lemar and Mbappe more than anyone else.People can ignore the fact all they want that they don't want to sell Lemar at any price this season.It's just the player's wish that is sort of forcing their hands a bit.Monaco are just finding excuses to not sell him but deep down they know they never wanted Mbappe and Lemar to leave this season even before the transfer window opened.Wenger will now take all the blame for being slow why the facts available prove he wasn't.

I don't think Arsene Wenger would agree with him, and I bet Le Prof is desperate to prove him wrong by winning the title without buying anyone at all!

«There are lies, damned lies and statistics» is an old and well appreciated quote suggesting that anyone can produce stats to prove anything at any time.

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

Nobody else we have is half as good as him at ST regardless of what anyone likes to suggest.Giroud is plenty good enough, we just need proper depth at ST.. If Villa go down Benteke is a prime candidate for me, 6» 3, more mobile than Giroud, just turned 24, and has proven he can boss it here.

For Wishere to come anywhere near West Ham he would have to prove his sustainability and for Wenger to come to his senses.If he thinks anyone is gonna buy Wilshere at # 20m and a buy back clause are living on another planet.

Bossi wrote that Williamson had more to prove than anyone at the onset of the camp.

But what can be done to ensure that a team like UCF — which was perfect, and which proved too late that it could beat just about anyone — has at least some path to the top?

He proved himself to be a more than ample shotstopper but once those crosses started coming in he would flap at them like a mad man, remind you of anyone?

The teams at the top are a cut above anyone else in the division and game weeks like this weekend just serve to prove that the gap is getting wider.

If he can get Ed Koch not to denounce him (Koch forced a majority of legislators in Albany to sign a pledge to reform redistricting, and well, he just proved to David Weprin he still does shrill as well as anyone) and a few goo - goos to stand next to him at his announcement of whatever compromise he ends up agreeing to, and calls it the Clean Redistricting Act or something, maybe he'll be OK.

Her latest drop, though, will prove to be one of the most game - changing product for anyone who is dreaming of mastering beachy waves at home.

Men, learn how to listen and care about what the other person has to say, and women, stop looking back at your broken relationship or broken heart and trying to prove you don't need anyone.

Anyone who meets the criteria and wants to use this website must create a free account and prove they are at least eighteen years old.

It automatically verifies a photo at the point of capture, proving its realness to anyone who views it.

Disney didn't even know what they wanted to do with it, were offering it to anyone who could produce a vision for the franchise, and Kosinski proved he could deliver over a long period of internal work at Disney, including a really startling trailer.

Though it's been awhile since Will Ferrell did something that really made me laugh, and Zach Galifianakis has failed to prove why he's so popular, the two actors excel at playing big, dumb characters, and anyone familiar with director Jay Roach's Austin Powers films knows that he loves that brand of goofball comedy.

rock star, who happens to be playing the event she's working at; they are but one of many chemistry - free pairings here, and Heigl nor anyone else's proven sense of timing can do much with what little they're given.

«At Jaguar, we have to do more than anyone else to prove that we're good on the attributes that we weren't in the past,» said design chief Ian Callum.

A raised lip at the leading edge of the load bay will prove annoying for anyone attempting to butt large boxes against the back of the seating but this aside it's a functional space.

Tensions are running high, and anything (or anyone) could be the fuse to ignite them: a recently released convict trying to prove his innocence, a prominent cattleman who craves respect at any cost, a wily traveling dentist at odds with a violent local blacksmith, or a firebrand of an editor who is determined to unlock the town's secrets.

Elizabeth says: «do you realistically think anyone is going to read books by no - names when you can get proven authors at the same price?»

When everyone is forced to sell their books at deep discount, even the big names, do you realistically think anyone is going to read books by no - names when you can get proven authors at the same price?

PLEASE make sure you reply to the confirmation email you will receive to prove we are not spamming anyone (and you can cancel at any time).

LOL death nice try on the trolling there lol you nearly had me for a second but after looking at the actual facts the ps4 has a 40 % power advantage overall, i am not gonna even ask if you are serious because anyone with eyes can see via the known 100 % proven specs the ps4 is more powerful.

So at the ending of the day I don't really believe that anyone needs to prove or give any type of evidence that games many times are not violent because I don't really believe that the argument nearly even needs to be about the violence and games as much as it's about that we already have a rating system for that type of content in the first place.

He says, to the musician who was around when Radiohead released In Rainbows and every single music critic spilled ink all over themselves in their excitement at the band, whose single «Creep» was played on heavy rotation on MTV when it was released, had proven that anyone could release an album on the internet and release it for any price and get a ton of money.

gbaikie December 18, 2012 at 11:07 am Re: «The AGWScienceFiction claim for their fictional «Greenhouse Effect Energy Budget» is that shortwave from the Sun, mainly visible, does all the heating of Earth's land and water — why won't you or anyone else prove this to me if you think this is real world physics?»

Given how noisy and chaotic the data is and how many processes are at work in the climate system, it blows my mind that anyone would use a temperature data trendline to prove any proposition in climate science.

For anyone who has any doubt as to significance of the HS with its spliced temperature record at the end of teh 20th century and its relationship to the GCMs in proving the case for man cause global warming, please view the following YouTube video.

I can not prove this by establishing the exact nature of gravity at all quantum levels, it is not known to me (or anyone) yet.

Anyone disputing Jelbrings hypothesis needs to prove that gravity does not provide a minimum heat / energy level in matter when that matter is being held back from falling further through the gravity field by the electro - magnetic and strong forces of the atoms in the rocks at the surface of the planet.

Otherwise the defendant would have a hard time defending himself (how to prove that you have not killed anyone at any time?)

First, and before anyone really has a shot at any leadership post, they must prove themselves as a «good (or great) lawyer» and most likely to some degree as a business developer as well.

An injured worker does not have to prove anyone was at fault to obtain workers» compensation insurance benefits.

At trial, the judge acquitted him, ruling that horse racing is not a «game» within the meaning of the Criminal Code, and that the Crown had failed to prove that anyone relied on his injecting or not injecting the horse with the drug.