Sentences with phrase «prove your point wrong»

I say that to say my point below is not to prove your points wrong, but just throw out a different view for discussion sake.

Not exact matches

Similar prophecies have proved wrong before and doubters point out that electricity bills for American factories will rise if the U.S. starts selling its growing supply of natural gas abroad and lifts current curbs on gasoline exports.

Meanwhile, if any of my points regarding R3 are provably wrong then prove them wrong.

This proves Buffett's point: «What the few bought for the right reason in 1925, the many bought for the wrong reason in 1929.»

In the legal field we call this a strawman, you are creating a situation or set of facts so that you can then subsequently prove it wrong and prove a point.

I completely disagree with you that it is ill mannered to ignore someone who has proven over and over again that their main purpose in talking to you is to point out that they disagree with all of your views, and that makes all your views wrong.

You pointed to a dispute of how neandertahal DNA didn't get included in human DNA, But that article doesn't change the FACT that neanderthals existed, which proves the bible wrong.

Agnostics recognize that neither atheists nor beleivers can PROVE their points and BOTH could be wrong.

My view is that the bible has been proven wrong on so many points that I would never consider it a source of information on anything.

Im just planting seed its really no point in me debating trying to prove Im right you wrong and vice versa.

When someone disagrees, your followers make a point of proving them wrong.

In addition to the significant biblical evidence that you gave for your position (a position which should be either accepted or proved wrong biblically), is one point that has come up in my study and that I have not seen mentioned anywhere.

The Bible has never been proven wrong in any point and the more science discovers the more the Bible is validated in every way.

I'm addicted to the momentary high that comes with saying my piece or making a point or proving somebody wrong.

Notice I didn't say win the argument, prove your point, or convince the other person they are wrong.

No, the point is you've been proven wrong in your uneducated prejudice interpretations of the scriptures and your ego can't handle it.

And if you were born in Egypt at the wrong time, I choose to kill you after you left the womb so I could try and prove a point to your leader.

@Angie, I know conservative Christians that do the same, use parts of the bible to prove their point, and to prove others wrong.

Most non-believers on here just want to declare there point of view that there is no God and dares everyone to prove them wrong.

We all believe in science but at certain points we disagree with it when not clear or mystic and there were moments when it was proven wrong.

I gave him the benefit of the doubt early on, even though every single person I have encountered, who is of the Reformed persuasion, has proven to be extremely capable of pointing out to everyone else where everyone else is wrong, and can do it in such a way as to give you the impression that, not only do they want to correct your erroneous beliefs, but also want to make sure you feel very, very bad about being completely wrong.

Yeah, but they are biased in that they seek to prove everything through the lens of evolution so they often look in the wrong direction, and a large number of scientists are in fact Christians My point is this, if you take the time to look for the evidence and be open to it, you will find that there is a respectable amount of evidence to support the fact that there is a god and that he is the God of Christianity

This leads him to his key point: «Let us make no mistake; the data we now have at hand should serve as a dire warning: Unless we act decisively, many of today's converts will be one - generation Jews — Jews with non-Jewish parents and non-Jewish children,» But Sarna concludes on a note that most Jews would find more hopeful: «Learned Jews and non-Jews have been making dire predictions about the future (or end) of the Jewish people for literally thousands of years — long before William Wirt and long after him — and, as we have seen, their predictions have proved consistently wrong.

Atheists aren't out to prove there is no God... they simply point out all the things wrong with the thinking and lack of evidence exhibited by theists.

If you disagree, please point me to incidents that prove me wrong.

Answer that logically to a point where there is no further why & you've proved thousands of philosophers across thousands of years wrong.

Don't get me wrong I think both are good but this shows that variation gives results, it may be the last game but it proves a point I believe

My point about Krychowiak was that I really don't think Wenger will go for him as he's not renowned for spending money perhaps the point was noit put across clearly for that I'll apologise but Ill be happy again to be proved wrong but I can not see it happening.

The German spoke about proving people wrong and seizing the opportunity that is left for Arsenal this season, by taking the full 15 points still available from the final five games.

Prove us wrong tomorrow Ozil or else the critics have a point!!

If I was to rate him on the ball I'd have give him a 3 he had one of those games where every time he touched the ball it went wrong but he was understandably nervous returning to old Trafford and wanting to prove a point.

The 22 - year - old is proving his doubters wrong this term as he's made the right - back slot at Old Trafford his own, making more appearances this year than he has at any other point in the five years he's been at the club, playing 37 games.

sanchez ain't on his game but can salvage us a point at any given moment — iwobi should not start over welbeck imo — of course id be happy to be proved wrong... doubt it tho

I think he will prove his doubters wrong, and I think he has not had the credit he deserves, but I also see their point, as the German has at times been a bit too easily out - muscled by opposing Premier League players since coming to north London.

He has to prove me wrong at some point

Many others, Giroud, Ozil, Cazorla, Monreal and Chambers have proved that we can be wrong and a player might just be going through a bad time where he needs our support the most, and at that point, we need to offer it.

His logic, as other commenters have pointed out, is inherently flawed, and has been proven wrong many times before.

Ozil, Cazorla, Coquelin, Ramsey, Monreal and Koscielny have all come under scrutiny at some point in their Arsenal careers but they have all rose above the crowd to prove their critics wrong.

l still cant belive how bad we are i really thought we would be good this year no CL to tire out the best and a free run at the league... What a fool i was id like to say sorry to all Arsenal fans who i may have disagreed with your posts before i admit im wrong tho id love Wenger to prove the world wrong and win the league its not happing no matter how much i want it No point us fighting with each other when we all want the same even if differnet ways but you guys know deep doen we need a new Manager and some one who will kick the lasy ass bitches we have playing for 1000s pounds each week up the dam arse and make them earn what they get paid... lf someone in my job did nt do there bit i tell u wouldnt be working long.

Doug Baldwin and Richard Sherman are celebrating by once again pointing out that they've proven all of their doubters wrong.

This guy will have a point to prove and was a really good player until Maureen put him in the wrong sort of system and ruined him.

The forward really came back with a bang after his frustrating spell on the sidelines and Coquelin was quick to point out that Giroud has always proven his many doubters wrong since coming to the club and the English Premier League a few years ago, but in a way these comments could be taken as a proof that perhaps the big man is the perfect player to have on the bench as he will want to come on and prove himself once again.

Take last season as a prime example, because just at the halfway point of the season when the big Frenchman was on fire and was well on the way to proving all the doubters wrong once and for all, it all turned around and Giroud then endured his worst period since joining the Gunners.

Your view that you proved your point is laughable to say the least, but suggest you have «moved on» because I have proved you completely wrong, not by my words, but by Grieamann's own words.

Sense Aminu has been proving the haters wrong that he can shoot, with the percentage he is shooting from 3 point land... He is now... Al farouq A3inu!

Then he goes ahead in the wrong direction just to prove a point all in the detriment to our trophy winning potential.

Another big reason is that Wenger has clearly made a point of mentioning it and knowing our number 17, that will make him even more determined to prove the stats wrong.

Picture this, we don't come out of the gate firing on all cylinders, Wenger speaks of how there wasn't enough time for the first - teamers to build chemistry, several key players aren't even playing because of Wenger's utterly ridiculous policy regarding players who played in the Confed Cup or the under21s and the boo - birds have returned in full flight... if these things were to happen, which is quite possible considering the Groundhog Day mentality of this club, how long do you think it will take for Wenger to recant his earlier statements regarding Europa... I would suggest that it's these sorts of comments from Wenger which are often his undoing... why would any manager worth his weight in salt make such a definitive statement before the season has even started... why would any manager who fashions himself an educated man make such pronouncements before even knowing what his starting 11 will be come Friday, let alone on September 1st... why would any manager who has a tenuous relationship with a great many supporters offer up such a potentially contentious talking point considering how many times his own words have come back to bite him in the ass... I think he does this because he doesn't care what you or I think, in fact he's more than slightly infuriated by the very idea of having to answer to the likes of you and me... that might have been acceptable during his formative years in charge, when the fans were rewarded with an scintillating brand of football and success felt like a forgone conclusion, but this new Wenger led team barely resembles that team of ore... whereas in times past we relished a few words from our seemingly cerebral manager, in recent times those words have been replaced by a myriad of excuses, a plethora of infuriating stories about who he could have signed but didn't and what can only be construed as outright fabrications... it's kind of funny that when we want some answers, like during the whole contract debacle of last season, we can't get an intelligent word out of him, but when we just what him to show his managerial acumen through his actions, we can't seem to get him to shut - up... I beg you to prove me wrong Arsene

But with power and endurance almost at their saturation point — it's hard for a young hotshot to blow a veteran off the court when he barely holds a physical advantage (19 - year old Bernard Tomic and 21 - year old Milos Raonic are attempting to prove this theory wrong)-- the best players in the game these days are also rather experienced.

The guy I replied to was clearly using a fallacious argument to somehow prove his very wrong point.