You have more than crossed the line, and in doing so have unintentionally
proven the points I made about the unloving ways some Christians treat LGBTQs.
Oh block away if that is what you want but in doing so, you will have
proved the point made.
All you have done is
prove the points I made by being judgmental, divisive and a know - it - all who really doesn't know much at all about people.
That proves the point I made about you.
Avianca LifeMiles is celebrating Cyber Week with a huge discount on the cost of its miles and going some way to
proving a point I made just last week (I'll come back to this point a little later).
Precisely
proving the point made in the article, Heartland has sent out an email which at first glance might look like one from the AMS.
Not exact matches
To get to this
point, 23andMe had to conduct extensive studies
proving the accuracy of its tests and assuring regulators that the reports can be easily understood by consumers so that they can
make informed health care decisions.
Ask yourself what questions need to be asked and answered in order to
prove the
point that the subpoint is
making?
Make a six figure income by gaining clients and providing marketing services with
proven results at a competitive price
point.
Fox News host Eric Bolling said on «The Specialists» —
making a
point that many in the Trump realm highlighted in similar ways — that Comey's comments on Lynch
proved the real «collusion.»
At some
point you have to
prove that you can
make some money.
There is an endless supply of business statistics (
proving most any
point you want to
make), research and studies (many with surprising results), and interesting real - life stories (of business success and failure), all available within seconds by doing a simple Google search.
Attracting new projects to NREC usually means
proving that they can be
made commercially viable, The Verge's report
points out, since projects normally come to the department from external clients - like commercial companies, NASA and the military.
When someone becomes a new subscriber to The Wagner Daily, our nightly ETF and stock newsletter with exact entry and exit
points for our best ETF and stock picks, we try hard to
make sure they understand our disciplined and
proven trend trading system.
I completely disagree with you that it is ill mannered to ignore someone who has
proven over and over again that their main purpose in talking to you is to
point out that they disagree with all of your views, and that
makes all your views wrong.
However the person going by»...» has a valid
point and you have
proven it by
making this as.sumption!
and you are just
proving his
point by
making that comment
He was just trying to
prove a
point by
making SYRIZA look unconstructive.
It's just a shame that we haven't come to the
point in society where it should be required that those who
make decisions must meet certain, more highly regulated, fool proof, corruption resistant criteria
proving their intellect and open mindedness as well as weeding out individuals with preconceived notions, racist, sexist or religiously or other discriminative views (even if they themselves don't believe they are discriminative in their beliefs... this happens more than many people realize) and overall ignorant minds.
And if my becoming defensive
proved your
point then I have to say that you have a very low threshold of proof which I suppose explains why you are so comfortable
making such sweeping generalizations based on no more evidence than your percieved experience.
your immature, irrational and absolute blind remarks toward atheism have been
proved that there is no rational argument beyond this
point, I suggest you read my post to the fullest and absorb it's meaning, and continue to act like a civilized being, your behavior is not acceptable in any rational debate, you are not
making yourself look good.
Ironically, this new version of the Bible, intended to
make the Bible understandable,
proves my
point: the Bible is incomprehensible to the casual reader.
Sure there are larger themes people are trying to
make, but they are
making it primarily off of Julie's narrative, using it as evidence for
proving a larger
point about the corruption of EV leaders.
Most Uncomfortable Way to
Make a
Point New Yorker rides into obstacles in bike lanes to prove a
Point New Yorker rides into obstacles in bike lanes to
prove a
pointpoint
When someone disagrees, your followers
make a
point of
proving them wrong.
If you can't argue intelligently and
make things up to
prove your
point, you must realize that intelligent people are going to call you out on it.
Making a sermon around 1 verse was popular in the 18th and 19th centuries, but I know the apostles
proved their
points by grabbing verses haphazardly.
IOW, your
point is really, like our atheist friends, that much of the above is about not being able to
prove the assertions religion
makes.
I'm addicted to the momentary high that comes with saying my piece or
making a
point or
proving somebody wrong.
I think the larger
point was lost here though which is when believers
make the claim for God the non-believers say «
Prove it.»
So, because you're now convinced the universe had a starting
point, you
make the leap to this
proves it was created by some god!?!?!?!?
I once read a blog written by a philosopher
making this
point about
proving a negative and using the very same example.
Colin... Your entire diatribe
proves my satirical and sarcastic
point that I
made earlier... «because a dog's coat gets thicker in the winter, therefore we came from a one - celled amoeba».
I
made an illusion to the fact that there are other things that obviously exist without evidence to others and asked for him to
prove his
point.
His parables frequently end with a «punch line» that presents a challenge to conventional expectation: the scorned Samaritan is the «good» one who
proves neighbor to the victim on the Jericho Road; those who come to work late at the harvest are provided the same reward as those who toiled all day; the wayward prodigal son is the one who is feasted; the prayer of a repentant sinner is more acceptable to God than that of a righteous Pharisee.9 Shorter sayings
make the same
point: A camel could pass through a needle's eye more easily than a person of great wealth can enter into God's inbreaking realm (Mt 19:24).
@hawaiiguest I believe I
made my original
point that the evolutionist are the more close minded of the two camps because they only trust what they can see or has been
proven by «scientist» Scientist or the progressives of their age once thought the earth was flat.
Nowhere is the author
making the
point that if people sin willfully, or even if they return to an empty form of religion which accomplished nothing, that this
proves that they do not have eternal life, lost their eternal life, or never had it in the first place.
No one will ever see it, just like no one ever saw three of the four vile posts you
made earlier, and you will simply have further
proved my
point regarding the vanity of the atheist worldview.
If you rely only on the bible to
make a
point, that
point is considered worthless because we've already
proved the bible worthless as source material.
Saying «case closed» does not automatically
make it closed, nor does it
prove your
point.
Romney
made the
point that as a leader who backs Israel, it's not for him to spout theory or rhetoric that could be averse to Israel's interest or
prove inflammatory.
Here's the thing Chuckles, religious persecution exists, but since the religions you cite still exist, then it is impossible for you to have
made your
point that «because no one worships egyptian, roman or greek gods, that
proves someone eradicated them..»
That would be like me
making quotes from Moby Dick to
prove my
point.
guilty as the men say but money
makes it all go away its not right the dummys r not being honest the
point was 2
prove he was a closet gay man ahhhhhhhhhhhh now they have the cash moron's
A God who is so desirous of
proving Himself right, that He plays around with humans lives, which mean nothing to Him, just to
make a
point.
In answer tothey not him.There is no place in the book, the Bible, that says the planet is only 6000 years old, it is the word of God, just because the Bible has been misinterpreted by men and women over the years does not
make it (the Bible) a work of fiction.The Bible has been
proven to be more accurate and unchanged than any other text of antiquity.Case in
point Kedorlaomer.
I gave him the benefit of the doubt early on, even though every single person I have encountered, who is of the Reformed persuasion, has
proven to be extremely capable of
pointing out to everyone else where everyone else is wrong, and can do it in such a way as to give you the impression that, not only do they want to correct your erroneous beliefs, but also want to
make sure you feel very, very bad about being completely wrong.
And again, I can be excused from
proving technically that the transcendentalist reasonings fail to
make religion universal, for I can
point to the plain fact that a majority of scholars, even religiously disposed ones, stubbornly refuse to treat them as convincing.
When you have a worthless
point, you have to
prove that
point in a big messy dumb way,
make sure everyone sees how dumb you are.
It stands to reason that an all knowing eternal God could predict what you and I would believe no before He
made and thus have already know whether we would except him or not And I'm not sure what you trying to say by that And because we want to tell others about Him and be used by Him to reach others And that commit does not
make any sense, but clearly God is not a punk, as I have already demonstrated And your main
point, as I already explained is false No, but my belief is true, none the less, it is by definition virtually impossible to
prove anything And no, I don't need knee pads.