If that was true there would be no progress, the fact we continue to progress
proves your theory WRONG.
If you can't express what you intend in numbers, and show how a certain result would prove your theory correct or a certain result that would
prove your theory wrong, then it's not science..
I don't know maybe I'm just crazy and someone will come with video evidence to
prove this theory wrong, but I think so much of what's wrong with the offense is by design.
But with power and endurance almost at their saturation point — it's hard for a young hotshot to blow a veteran off the court when he barely holds a physical advantage (19 - year old Bernard Tomic and 21 - year old Milos Raonic are attempting to
prove this theory wrong)-- the best players in the game these days are also rather experienced.
According to him, results from current neutrino detectors have been somewhat puzzling when compared with theoretical predictions, but at the same time they are not conclusive enough to
prove the theories wrong.
In this article we're going to try to
prove this theory wrong, and reintroduce the pullover into your routines in all of its former glory.
However, data from a recent survey on Engage.com
proves this theory wrong.
Well, your training techniques
proved those theories wrong.
I thought I could
prove this theory wrong.
I'm not saying today someone is going to
prove their theories wrong, but frankly, clinging to it seems more a religious fervor than true science.
We can
prove a theory wrong without providing an alternative explanation.
However, the first step to
proving a theory wrong is to understand what it actually says.
My impression reading this is that Dr. Hansen realizes that since this data
proves his theory wrong and he is actually willing to «modify the data» to try and keep AGW alive.
Beyond that, the scientific method requires you try to
prove a theory wrong.
Not exact matches
Many of the
theories which were taught as scientific fact have been
proved wrong.
They are soon to be
proved wrong again... even Pope John Paul realized this when he said evolution was a viable
theory.
But you can't dismiss possibilities or
theories until they are
proven wrong.
As science has its credentials, it has also had its flaws with
theories being changed, or even
proven dead
wrong.
Like all science, of course, it is falsifiable — but no one has ever
proven it
wrong, and no one has ever come up with a better
theory that explains so much of the natural world using one simple concept, testable using logic and experiment.
As for the article there is still no DNA evidence to support it so in
theory Nothing is related... And why does it matter what or why we believe in God??? If you want to
prove us so
wrong do more then flap your mouth..
If he can not, or will not provide verifiable evidence to support his
theory, there is nothing to
prove wrong.
More like from chemistry to astrophysics — there's a lot about the universe that can't be explained but but physicists put a lot of faith in
theory until their definitevly
proven wrong.
Darwin was hopeful that future fossils would
prove his
theory correct, but instead, the lack of transitional links has
proven his
theory to be
wrong.
Science takes credit for trying to interpret what God has created (yet of course there
theories are always
wrong or never
proven, even after
proven, often changed when found out to be false (because scientists are
wrong all the time and think they are right)
Even his most complex
theory which seems to involve matter in the universe disappearing permanently in various places, which he even challenged to his opponents to
prove wrong, was pretty much
proven wrong by a group of determined scientists.
It is true that many scientific
theories have
proven to be
wrong but many have also been
proven to be fact including many that religion had deemed as blasphemy such as the world is round and the sun is the center of our solar system.
Trying to insert god into scientific
theories is only setting yourself up for science to
prove you
wrong in time, so how about you try and look at things with a fresh perspective and consider the possibility that god (or at least the version of god you have in mind) has a very low probability of existing.
As Albert once made comment that he hoped his
theory would be
proven wrong.
Come on... I do see scientific
theories as interesting — However, I am open to the idea that it is all
wrong, even the
theories that were «
proven» and became «fact» — Why?
The most that any valid scientific finding has ever
proven is that the old well - tested
theory was
wrong.
It's a
theory if not
proven wrong.
Scientific
theories are
proven wrong everyday and to put all your eggs in one basket is, well, foolish.
It is still a
theory I widely accepted
theory and probably true but still it has not been
proven and may yet be
proven wrong and another
theory replace similar to your eample of Newton versus Einstein.
That
theory has been
proven wrong in so many cases: Stanford, Michigan, Wisconsin, Ohio State, FSU, Florida, and many others.
He was not even on the pitch for the last two games, so the
theory that we are totally reliant on him has already been
proved wrong.
It's not rocket science, these are basic
theories / opinions which many think would make us great, but the obstinate one will not do what other want him to because he is obsessed with
proving sensible voices
wrong by playing decent (but not great) players and playing in a stylish fluid manner, which other teams have worked out and which makes us largely one dimensional.
He's
proved that
theory wrong.
i really do nt want to be mean to him but far as him being a striker im at a loss: i do hope he
proves my
theory that hes dreadful
wrong.
«What makes science science — publicly presenting facts and reasoning, subjecting ideas to rigorous criticism and many rounds of testing to confirm or overturn
theories — is premised upon a willingness to be
proved wrong,» Holt wrote.
Einstein derisively called this «spooky action at a distance,» and he took it to «
prove» that quantum
theory was
wrong, since nothing can travel faster than the speed of light.
The team printed t - shirts with that motto, written in Greek, acknowledging the fact that many of the
theories they tested were eventually
proved wrong.
This
theory has now been
proven wrong, in fruit flies at least.
Although no one could ever
prove James Allen's
theories, we can certainly find lots of examples of people who have brought negatives into their lives by concentrating on the
wrong things.
Well, I guess I
proved that
theory wrong!
Fortunately for everyone, feelings are not facts, and any negative conclusions you have come to regarding your dating life truly are just
theories, waiting to be
proven right or
wrong.
Scientific Facts
Proving Charles Darwin's
Theory of Evolution is
Wrong, False, and Impossible.
Women have
proved those
theories to be flat - out
wrong!
I was
wrong here to hold out for my fair value estimate (which
proved more
theory than fact),
wrong to hold out for a takeover offer that never quite materialised,
wrong to assume the board & major shareholders could still reliably line up an exit & extract value before it evaporated.
However, a quick check of the area
proved that
theory wrong.
Well, Coal
proved that
theory wrong.