Off topic,,, I must admit there must be some people out there who make it a point they spite Arsenal fans by cooking up stories about Wenger interest in players which just
proves false when he signs an injured KK in January....
In his book Fooled by Randomness, Nassim Taleb defined Black Swan (the term refers to the once prevalent old world belief that all swans are white, which was
proven false when black swans were discovered in Australia) as a rare event that is (1) unexpected (2) carries an extreme impact and (3) believed to be predictable in hindsight.
Not exact matches
When it does make falsifiable predictions, they
prove to be
false.)
There is much that could be said about this, but I will stick with one thing, based on discussion at about the 2 minute mark:
When atheists insist that atheism does not drive behavior, and then then campaign on behalf of atheism, ridicule religion and religious believers in the name of atheism, seek to change laws in favor of their atheistic positions, recommend the extermination of religion, and practice falsehoods like Dawkins's in support of atheism, they
prove that their atheism drives their behavior and that their premise is
false, disingenuous, and (as far as I can tell) useless for anything but giving atheism rhetorical cover from being implicated in atheists» atrocities.
So,
when Christian morality fails, or falls behind society, it just
proves that this assumption is
false.
Science takes credit for trying to interpret what God has created (yet of course there theories are always wrong or never
proven, even after
proven, often changed
when found out to be
false (because scientists are wrong all the time and think they are right)
How can any church muzzle people in the 21st century
when science and technology
prove so many of their tenets to be
false?
To insist on an axiom
when it has been
proven false is the very height of ignorance.
Atheists can
prove that science exists, that the earth is more than 6000 years old, that their is NO WAY to build the size ark that Noah built and do what is claimed in the bible, again
when making extraordinary claims, we need evidence and we know that snakes do not talk, that the laws of physics can not be suspended and that nearly EVERY claim in the bible is
false.
The sad part is they try to
prove religions
false when they are ignorant of what we even believe in.
It was not true
when you first said it, you have never shown any true basis and what you have shown, has been
proven false.
When you use a historical point to
prove Christianity is
false, history is objective truth.
But
when addressing a somewhat similar line of reasoning in another context, Griffin states that the «question is not whether one can
prove beyond any doubt that every traditional free - will theodicy is
false.
my question, is what do these idiots do on the 22nd
when the end of the world does nt come and everything they believe in is
proven false?
but i'm not too sure
when sooooo many people base their MORALs on imaginary fairy tales... so if they were
proved false the ignorant masses would turn on each other and claw and bite their way to the top....
Science is a method of testing and verifying observable information in our universe, and
when a theory is
proven false it is abandoned.
It's been conclusively
proven false many times, including in our own post on How to Cook a Perfect Prime Rib, where we found that
when roasting a standing roast, it in fact lost 1.68 % more juice if it was seared before roasting rather than after!
While «the click» last season,
when United went on their run of six successive, eye - catching wins, may have
proven to be a
false dawn, there may be reasons as to why the team failed to kick on and why this time it could be different.
Some people have a crazy notion that they'll believe stuff
when it's
proven true, not that they'll believe it as long as it's not
proven false.
Such seemingly inexplicable behavior is reminiscent of the response of cults
when their predictions
prove entirely
false.
Secondly, fraud is
proved when it is shown that
false representation has been made knowingly or without belief in its truth or recklessly, careless whether it be true or
false.»
The Shadow Chancellor said Labour's leader had to tear up large sections of his speech
when rumours of what George Osborne would announce in Parliament
proved false.
The assay —
when compared against the performance of the conventional ELISA — has
proved to be «up to clinical standards,» according to the researchers, with the added ability of removing the
false positives, thereby eliminating the need for repeated testing.
But
when in 2007 the UK's General Medical Council
proved the given story
false, and arraigned Walker - Smith for misconduct, he sat mute for many months while the council's lawyers set out its proof, and then, after the prosecution's case closed, he announced a new story: that he was only involved in clinical care, and that the approved research project never even happened.
I thought that the unevenness was something that you just need to accept
when seeing a new one, but SOUTHBOUND has
proven that surrender to be completely
false.
However, Battle of the Sexes is mainly about how even
when women were
proving that they could be as equal as the men, there was still this
false male dominance over women.
This sort of
proves false the maxim that its the best time to buy
when things look the worst.
so
when the opportunity arose he vented not realising his «facts» are dated and
false thus making himself look very silly and
proving fanboyism in journalist is very much alive
Regarding eugenics, you forgot the overwhelming similarity that they were both widespread, media - friendly, commonly - believed «facts» that
proved to be
false (whether or not Global Warming is
false is obviously debatable, but he's operating with that disclaimer
when he makes the comparison, and thus it is necessary to operate under it
when disputing his claims.)
It occurs
when either a proposition is assumed to be true because it has not yet been
proved false or a proposition is assumed to be
false because it has not yet been
proved true.»
Just how can we believe this
when most everything else you present is
proven false.
I was in court
when Ms Reilly's genial co-counsel made his argument for Mann, which was a straightforward appeal to authority: Why, all these eminent acronymic bodies, from the EPA and NSF and NOAA even unto HMG in London, have
proved that all criticisms of Mann are
false and without merit.
What happens
when many statements are
proved incorrect, but they continue to repeat them or fail to acknowledge they were
false?
Why bring up funding
when the funding behind any expert is irrelevant unless it is conclusively
proven that it paid for
false information from that expert?
She instead inferred that money influence had tainted what he said so badly that none of it was worthy of consideration, which crumbles to dust
when she and other accusers fail to
prove that industry money was given to skeptic scientists in exchange for laughably and demonstratively
false fabricated papers, reports or assessments.
when i say «impossible to
prove», that does not mean «unproven»
when i say «a lie», that means «a statement which is
false» self contradiction is proof of falsehood (this is how falsification is done).
Dangerous, because claiming that any one technology can solve the climate crisis, particularly
when that technology has not been
proven at the required scale, can breed
false complacency.
In its argument for the existence of CAGW, Working Group 1 employs the negated law as a
false premise thusly arriving at the conclusion that CAGW is
proved when it is not
proved on account of the
false premise.
When it comes to defamation, the plaintiff must
prove that the defendant's
false statements led to financial loss.
After all, it was less than two months ago that fans were let down
when rumors
proved false that the Beatles would be available on iTunes.
This critical analytical distinction gives rise to the requirement that a public figure defamation plaintiff, in addition to
proving that the statement was
false, must
prove a defendant's actual malice (i.e., knowledge of falsity or conscious disregard as to the truth) in order to win a defamation claim.169 The concept itself is fluid and nuanced, providing a purposive device that can be used to ascertain
when the «second order» of defamation claim proposed herein is to be used.
The case first captured attention in 2013
when the Ontario Court of Appeal confirmed that students are «consumers» and education a «consumer product», and that consumers do not need to
prove reliance on a
false, misleading or deceptive representation to establish an unfair practice and a right to a remedy.
When reviewing convictions, we focus on the forms of weak evidence which have been
proven unreliable over the past few decades — such as mistaken eyewitness identifications,
false confessions, and bad forensics.
It is important to have an experienced attorney by your side
when facing these types of charges.The Law Offices of Michael S. Discioarro, LLC will defend you against these types of frivoulous charges with a full investigation, and if need be, will prepare for trial and
prove these charges
false.
When those allegations were
proven false, new allegations have already begun.
When a child reports being sexually molested or physically abused, the child should be protected until and unless the report is
proven false