Sentences with phrase «proves much of anything»

In the meantime back in the real world Teh Modulz don't agree with each other, and any intellectually honest and remotely objective observer would not be claiming that CAGW True Believers have, to a (wo) man, declared that this state of affairs proves much of anything other than something which is already axiomatic: there really is a great deal more forward - looking uncertainty that rearward.

When it comes to the big questions, nobody can prove much of anything... neither science nor religion.

Jones had been billed as the person who would finally provide some unambiguous answers to the Melungeon question, yet he began by telling them that their DNA didn't prove much of anything at all.

In Florida you can basically get a divorce by asking, ie you do not have to prove much of anything except that one of the parties must reside 6 months in the state before the filing of papers.

Not exact matches

There is much that could be said about this, but I will stick with one thing, based on discussion at about the 2 minute mark: When atheists insist that atheism does not drive behavior, and then then campaign on behalf of atheism, ridicule religion and religious believers in the name of atheism, seek to change laws in favor of their atheistic positions, recommend the extermination of religion, and practice falsehoods like Dawkins's in support of atheism, they prove that their atheism drives their behavior and that their premise is false, disingenuous, and (as far as I can tell) useless for anything but giving atheism rhetorical cover from being implicated in atheists» atrocities.

If anything, Tony's actions are only proving how much of a unrelenting, unyielding, unrepentant narcissist he really is.

@david johson your long response offers no proof of anything, opinions and personal interpretation are not «proof «you admitted as much -LRB-, the old i can't prove a negative) but you impressed the heck out of martin t (not particularly difficult on that, as he appears to thrive on any bs that seems to support his «position») Just a side bar Santa does exist, or rather did, Saint Nicholas, Didn't know him personally and I don't think he was anything like the «Coke» version, but the persona is supposedly based on an actual person.

to J.W. and fred — i think its rather silly to argue anything as fact if its cleary thought based (i.e. lacking proof / evidence) when asked about the where did we come from or how the universe (whatever) i always answer with i don't know, but then i pose an idea — i state openly thats its only an idea... if any one of you religions folks would simple agree to the FACT that what you BELIEVE is real is REALLY only an idea until proven (much like evolution) then i would find much more pleasing conversations beyond the realm of atheists... but alas, i am still waiting — i found some but most are imovible in there beliefs that god is real, provable, and most def.

Will, The bible and extracts from it on buildings is not proof of anything in the bible; apart from places and a few people very little of the bible has been proven correct and much of the foundation is proven incorrect.

They embraced MITT ROMNEY, the same guy THEY said was nothing but a wishy - washy salesman who'll slit the throat of anyone in his way and say anything to get elected (and proved as much during the primary).

The fact that there are pessimistic and apocalyptic «minded Catholics does not prove anything about dispensationalism, but says much of the dangers of straying from the norms of Scripture, Tradition, and authoritative teaching.

After running the rule over Roberto Soldado and Emmanuel Adebayor, it soon became clear to the Argentinian just how much of a waste it would be to do anything but play the younger, less experienced player who quickly proved himself to be irresistible, initially in Europe and then in the league.

We gave everything in the first half and if anything we ran out of legs a bit in the second, We couldn't give as much as we wanted to and maybe we ran out of steam.We had a point to prove.

The experimental nature of the film also proves a charm, the ten minute shots make interesting viewing and a high budget cyclorama backdrop that includes the empire state building makes the film look much more modern than anything else from the 1940's.

If anything, that proves how much faith the studio has in the Russos» ability to hold onto the reins of its money - making machine.

Streep's not exactly someone you associate with the action genre, but as the «Expendables» movies have proved, what with the casting of say, Kelsey Grammer and Terry Crews, they're pretty much open to anything on those films now.

One of the most relaxed, yet theatrical, tour de force performances in recent years, his performance proves two things: (1) Robert Downey, Jr. can do pretty much anything when it comes to performing, and (2) Robert Downey, Jr. can make just about any creep really likable.

Though my five - plus years on a school board in upstate New York certainly proved to me that boards lacked the capacity to do much of anything effectively, I never gave up hope.

And ii) Trump as President really could happen (for much the same reasons as the Brexit vote), but now the market (like the GOP) already seems to be moving on to bargaining (& acceptance)... And anyway, a) East Coast - West Coast shame at the idea of a Trump presidency shouldn't precipitate an actual market decline, b) a President who likely ends up isolated from Congress is sure to be pretty ineffectual (as Obama's proved), c) if Trump manages to get anything done, it would probably be stimulative for the market, and d) if Hillary wins... yawn, plus ca change!

I understand that there is anxiety about margins and the product pipeline, but Apple doesn't have to do much of anything to justify a higher price except prove that they're not completely irrelevant.

With little in the way of special abilities at your disposal and enemies proving fairly challenging combat feels rewarding, but as you progress through the game and earn more abilities the standard attack becomes next to useless as abilities recharge so quickly and do so much damage that using anything else feels pointless.

I present to you Frontier Dev - Expansions / Updates & Micro transactions done right - with no Loot Boxes - it proves its possible to have Monetization in games to prolong the games longevity to the advantage of the gamer and the developers With EA, its corporate greed, I truly believe if they removed the Pay -2-Win scenarios this would of not garnered as much attention as it has and for now at least I can not see how they can re-implement anything that gamers alike are going to get behind in there droves - EA shafted themselves with seeing the consumer as a money pit and assuming that gamers have either an unlimited source of funds or its acceptable to suddenly throw out the balance of a game due to financial gain.

Of course a ton of it from pretty much anything critiquing sexist / misogynistic behavior (the rule is typically any article that talks about these issues is proven correct if you read the comments under the article:POf course a ton of it from pretty much anything critiquing sexist / misogynistic behavior (the rule is typically any article that talks about these issues is proven correct if you read the comments under the article:Pof it from pretty much anything critiquing sexist / misogynistic behavior (the rule is typically any article that talks about these issues is proven correct if you read the comments under the article:P).

Why they made an HD of Type - 0 I'll never understand, but the fact that it was shot into the bargain bin so close after launch pretty much proves my point... if anything most people who bought it, got it for the XV demo.

The discovery in the mid 19th century that there had been ice ages in the distant past proved that climate could change radically over much of the globe, a change vastly beyond anything mere humans seemed able to cause.

His other main objection is the much more substantive one that Mike Rossander's fit of 99.992 % with zero sensitivity proves that anything can be proved using my approach.

The other thinks there is no evidence of anything much being going to happen, and thinks that we should spend our efforts on doing things with proven benefits for people, like bringing them electricity, safer cooking fires, freedom from malaria, clean drinking water.

Presumably they would dismiss the danger because a) no - one could prove how much exact warming would be caused and b) they'd argue a warmer world is better and of course c) countries are free to inject anything they want into the global atmosphere.

Regardless, the Salby and the Spash cases provide an excellent opportunity for those of you who believe anything much is going to change under a Coalition government, to prove your point to us heathen unbelievers who are planning to vote for Themm this election.

Unlike many of your posts which I believe can be proven to be misleading; and many of your contributors who are extremely abusive much of the time, I suspect that the only thing that was really offensive about my blog is that neither you nor they were unable to falsify anything I posted on it.

But when you pick up threads and only show them as proving no AGW and have not done anything like as much checking of those facts as you demand from the pro AGW proofs, you aren't being skeptical, you're denying AGW.

The family's obituary adds: «Driven to succeed, she wanted to prove that given equal opportunities, a woman can accomplish as much as a man; she refused to let anything deter her from what she was capable of doing.