The experience has
proved this theory incorrect.
Not exact matches
A person of science, such as yourself should be open to all possibilities, lest your
theory be
proven incorrect and you are left with nothing.
Piper, when a scientific
theory is
proven incorrect, scientists celebrate for now they have more to learn and new ways to approach learning.
Science is based on finding the facts, but many times throughout history different scientific
theories (once beleived as fact) have been
proven incorrect - thus creating a new
theory based off the original but inclusive to the new facts that have arisen.
In science, you can never «
prove» a hypothesis or
theory, you can only continue to find support for it or
prove it
incorrect.
When a religious
theory is
proven incorrect, people get killed and information gets buried with their bodies.
These proofs and evidence — geological history of the Earth, evolution, existence of dinosaurs, Big Bang
Theory, etc, etc —
prove that the God described in the Bible is a myth and completely
incorrect.
First Person Shooters and Role Playing Games don't typically sound like things that go well together, but Borderlands
proves the
theory spectacularly
incorrect.
You have spent a great deal of time describing why you believe that the science behind the hockey stick phenomenon is more uncertain than how it was portrayed, and you have spent a lot of time analyzing the tribalism behind what you characterized as a «dishonest» approach to representing data, but from what I've seen, you have spent remarkably little time talking about the volumes of unsound data which were deliberately fabricated, or at the very least twisted, by those with a vested interest in
proving theories of AGW
incorrect.
If this is
proven out, then to me it will just be one of many, many reasons that the
Theory of Global Warming is
incorrect.
This is simply a fact, though of course it does not necessarily «
prove» that the
theory of catastrophic anthropogenic global warming is
incorrect.
It's possible that this fully accepted
theory might
prove utterly
incorrect like so manay before, as jhm (# 1) points out.
If AGW
theory is
proven incorrect, then university climate research funding might be cut by 100 %.
«All innocence cases are difficult because often, not only do you have to
prove that the prosecution was based on
incorrect evidence, but you also have to
prove that a different
theory is likely to be what occurred.