Several decades ago, when I was filling out my application for seminary admission, I came to a question that asked me to
provide biblical justification for my calling.
As if I'd give ANY credence to a mouthpiece for a so - called «church» which was LITERALLY founded for the purpose of
providing Biblical justification of slavery.
Not exact matches
It is my contention that a
biblical understanding of the cross leads necessarily to a nonviolent stance and, conversely, that only a fully
biblical view of the cross and
justification can
provide an adequate foundation for nonviolence.
According to the Times, there were posts on Cenedella's blog about a «new holiday for men» that involved women
providing steaks and oral sex, and a separate entry that endorsed a link to a
Biblical justification of polygamy.