When in the opinion of the Director of Purchase it will not create any burden or hardship upon the County and the anticipated prices will not be adversely affected thereby, the Director is authorized when he deems appropriate and as may be requested by the participants to
provide in any particular County bid specification that the participants in Erie County shall have the right to make purchases based upon the bids received by the County.
Not exact matches
Should the
County Executive, his or her appointed Director of Budget and Management, or anyone fail to
provide information including but not limited to the budget reports requested
in subsection (f) above, the chair of the Commission shall notify the clerk of the Erie
County Legislature and the chair of the Erie
County Legislature,
in writing, and the Chair of the Legislature shall compel that such information be
provided to the Commission by exercising the powers available to the Legislature,
in particular those powers to subpoena and require the production of evidence as outlined
in article 2, section 202, paragraph h of Local Law No.1 - 1959, as amended, constituting the Erie
County Charter.
Specifically, this project has two key elements: (1) a one - day convening (12/12/14) that forges relationships among stakeholders
in Hampden
County's early education field with influential leaders and experts from across the nation, where they engage
in mutual learning and dialogue around the goal of strengthening individual and organization capacities to advance early learning for all; and (2) a multi-pronged communication strategy, rooted
in the convening and designed to
provide guidance around the field's most pressing needs, with a
particular focus on strengthening the quality of Pre-K for at - risk children, like many of those growing up Hampden
County.
Effective immediately, the Emergency Order (Docket Number DOT - OST -2014-0067), requires that each railroad operating trains containing more than 1,000,000 gallons of Bakken crude oil, or approximately 35 tank cars,
in a
particular state to
provide the SERC notification regarding the expected movement of such trains through the
counties in that state.
Prof. Conduct 123 (2001)(subject to the operational structure and content described
in the opinion, a lawyer may affiliate with an online legal services website); Nebraska Op. 07 - 05 (lawyer may participate
in internet lawyer directory which identifies itself as a directory, disclaims being a referral service and only lists basic information about lawyers without recommending specific lawyers and charges a reasonable, flat annual advertising fee); New Jersey Committee on Attorney Advertising Op. 36 (2006)(lawyer may pay flat fee to internet marketing company for exclusive website listing for
particular county in specific practice area if listing includes prominent, unmistakable disclaimer stating the listings are paid advertisements and not endorsements or authorized referrals); North Carolina Op. 2004 - 1 (lawyer may participate
in for - profit online service that is a hybrid referral service - legal directory,
provided there is no fee - sharing with the service and communications are truthful); Oregon Op. 2007 - 180 (2007)(lawyer may pay nationwide internet referral service for listing if listing is not false or misleading and does not imply that the lawyer can represent clients outside jurisdictions of the lawyer's license, fee is not based on number of referrals, retained clients or revenue generated by listing and the service does not exercise discretion
in matching clients with lawyers); Rhode Island 2005 - 01 (permitting website that enables lawyers to post information about their services and respond to anonymous requests for legal services
in exchange for flat annual membership fee if website exercises no discretion over which requests lawyers may access); South Carolina 01 - 03 (lawyer may pay internet advertising service fee determined by the number of «hits» that the service produces for the lawyer
provided that the service does not steer business to any
particular lawyer and the payments are not based on whether user ultimately becomes a client); Texas Op. 573 (2006)(lawyer may participate
in for - profit internet service that matches potential clients and lawyers if selection process is fully automated and performed by computers without the exercise of human discretion); Virginia Advertising Op.