Here's how the latest push to
provide measures of school quality fall short.
Not exact matches
The
measures used in the NEPC report — whether
schools make AYP, state accountability system ratings, the percentage
of students that score proficient on state tests, and high -
school graduation rates — are at best rough proxies for the
quality of education
provided by any
school.
Attitudes: support for diversity (racial integration), a perception
of inequity (that the public
schools provide a lower
quality education for low - income and minority kids), support for voluntary prayer in the
schools, support for greater parent influence, desire for smaller
schools, belief in what I call the «public
school ideology» (which
measures a normative attachment to public
schooling and its ideals), a belief in markets (that choice and competition are likely to make
schools more effective), and a concern that moral values are poorly taught in the public
schools.
These «externalities» that make everyone better off
provide still another reason for taking
measures that will enhance the
quality - not just the quantity -
of schooling.
Therefore, a single score, taken alone, can not
provide a comprehensive
measure of the achievement
of a student, and it certainly is not sufficient to judge the
quality of a
school or an educational system.
The framework
provides a holistic assessment
of school performance based on student growth and achievement in grades 3 — 8;
school climate
measures, including attendance and re-enrollment; and preschool classroom
quality.
More important, however, is the larger implication I take from Mr. Bedrick's thesis: that private
school choice advocates in America, Mr. Bedrick among them, have failed to establish a coherent, prevailing belief system about the role
of private
schools in
providing an education
of measured quality, at scale, for the nation's most disadvantaged youth.
«The goals and
measures of success outlined in our approved state plan shows Hawaii's continued commitment to
providing equitable access to
quality education, and empowers our educators to innovate and design
schools that meet the needs
of their communities,» said Hawaii State Department
of Education Superintendent Dr. Christina Kishimoto.
This new unit should focus on
providing a student experience that excels on
measures different from the traditional
measures of quality — such as top - notch extracurricular offerings and state -
of - the - art facilities — that private
schools have historically used.
When finished, the newly developed and validated online tool will
measure school leaders» capacity to observe and analyze the
quality of classroom instruction,
provide feedback to teachers, and plan professional development for teaching staff.
«This
measure is a very reasonable and carefully thought - out approach to bringing innovative solutions to our public
schools and improving the
quality of education we
provide to all students in Washington,» Litzow said in a news release.
Much
of their attention is focused on which indicators
of school quality or student success they will use to
provide a more holistic
measure of school performance than the test - based
measures of the past.
While U.S. Secretary
of Education Arne Duncan did his best to spin the administration's efforts as a solution for No Child's supposedly «broken» accountability
measures, which he proclaimed, was «misleading» in identifying
schools and districts — especially in suburbia — failing to
provide high -
quality education to poor and minority kids.
Measure and improve the
school's climate (
quality and character) to
provide a safe, equitable and engaging environment for each member
of the network to effectively contribute; and
These include: · Use
of instructional programs and curricula that support state and district standards and
of high
quality testing systems that accurately
measure achievement
of the standards through a variety
of measurement techniques · Professional development to prepare all teachers to teach to the standards · Commitment to
providing remedial help to children who need it and sufficient resources for
schools to meet the standards · Better communication to
school staff, students, parents and the community about the content, purposes and consequences
of standards · Alignment
of standards, assessment and curricula, coupled with appropriate incentives for students and
schools that meet the standards In the unlikely event that all
of these efforts, including a change in
school leadership, fail over a 3 - year period to «turn the
school around,» drastic action is required.
At the very least, the concept is an interesting approach to
measuring the
quality of schools — and could
provide the kind
of information families need to know what
schools look like as well as how well they do in improving student achievement.
The completed online, video - based assessment tool aims to
measure how
school leaders can observe and notice the
quality of classroom instruction, interpret their observations and
provide productive feedback to the teacher, and use the observations to plan professional development for the teaching staff.
The accountability system also
provides a public record
of how each public
school is performing — graduation rates, standardized test scores, teacher
quality and
school safety are all
measured and reported each year.
Measuring academic success as students progress from preschool through high
school and into college
provides important information about the
quality of the DPS education system.
In No Small Change: Targeting Money Toward Student Performance, researchers analyze more than 100 variables before they grade states from A to F on four major categories: the rigor and clarity
of the state's standards in core subjects; its efforts to improve teacher
quality; its
school climate as
measured by absenteeism,
school safety, parental involvement, character education, and other variables; and the extent to which it
provides resources equitably.
Our team
of experienced reviewers will carefully read each section
of your application and
provide constructive feedback on the
quality of your application as measured against our Quality Standards for Developing Charter S
quality of your application as
measured against our
Quality Standards for Developing Charter S
Quality Standards for Developing Charter
Schools.
The
measure would help states expand access to high -
quality charter
schools by
providing $ 300 million for FY12 and each
of the next five years to support states» creation, replication, and expansion
of high -
quality charter
schools through competitive grants.
WHEREAS, the San Diego Unified Vision 2020, long - term strategic plan,
Quality Schools in Every Neighborhood, supports and provides for quality teaching, access to broad and challenging curriculum for all students, closing the achievement gap with high expectations for all, and is committed to using multiple formative measures of success that go beyond standardized achievement tes
Quality Schools in Every Neighborhood, supports and
provides for
quality teaching, access to broad and challenging curriculum for all students, closing the achievement gap with high expectations for all, and is committed to using multiple formative measures of success that go beyond standardized achievement tes
quality teaching, access to broad and challenging curriculum for all students, closing the achievement gap with high expectations for all, and is committed to using multiple formative
measures of success that go beyond standardized achievement tests; and
The report notes that evaluations are most effective when value added scores are combined with other classroom
measures, such as observations — which
provide opportunities for
school leaders and line managers to see teachers in action — and surveys
of pupils about the
quality of teaching they receive.
After separating out the timing issue, better
measures of the
quality of instruction
provided by districts,
schools and teachers can be obtained.
In order to
provide teachers feedback on their instructional alignment, we need high
quality measures of their instruction throughout the
school year.
While I think it's time for other districts and the Colorado Department
of Education to learn from Denver's work, we need to have a series
of discussions about how to have more
school performance data
provided to families and how / whether this information is rolled up into a single
measure of «
school quality.»
Massachusetts aims to strengthen the
quality of school leadership across the state by strengthening principals» skills in three areas: observing classroom practice, analyzing
measures of student learning and teacher effectiveness, and
providing timely and high - impact feedback to their faculty.
Thus, the performance index not only
provided an average
measure of school quality, but also
provided more fine - grained results to guide improvement (Schafer, 2003).