Sentences with phrase «provide poor protection»

Not all offer electronic stability control as standard and most provide poor protection for vulnerable road users such as pedestrians in the event of a collision.»

The only negative points noted by the testers were that one of the rear doors opened during the side - impact test and that the windscreen pillars provided poor protection for a pedestrian's head.

Not exact matches

In his final chapter Brown observes that the growing appreciation of the legitimacy of the cry of the poor created a social awareness that the powerful were obligated to provide justice and protection for the poor.

All of the Israelite law codes provide for the protection of the poor.

Poor quality packages which provide little or no protection during handling, transport and storage.

The budget would increase spending by two percent while expanding economic development and jobs programs and providing some protections for the poorest New Yorkers and immigrants.

As well as providing protection from the increasingly unpredictable weather, the premiums could also be a powerful way to get poor people to adapt to climate change by encouraging them to invest in measures like drought - resistant crops.

It may be, then, that a certain level of vitamin E deficiency is needed to «activate» some of the harmful effects of smoking, and that poor - quality animal fats and a few helpings of partially hydrogenated vegetable oils are the best way to achieve this, but that fats that weren't tested in this study such as high - quality butter or relatively saturated but vitamin E-rich virgin palm oil may provide the most superior protection.

«Plaintiffs still could have demonstrated a facial equal protection violation, however, by showing that the challenged statutes, regardless of how they are implemented, inevitably cause poor and minority students to be provided with an education that is not «basically equivalent to» their more affluent and / or white peers.»

Eventually, many California politicians and education officials came to believe that the protections provided made it nearly impossible to fire poor performers.

Good or adequate protection was provided to the head of a struck pedestrian over most of the bonnet surface, with poor results recorded at the base of the windscreen and on the stiff windscreen pillars.

The protection provided by the bonnet to the head of a struck pedestrian was predominantly good or adequate, with poor results recorded on the stiff windscreen pillars.

However, the seat / head restraints in most current minivan models are marginal or poor, indicating they wouldn't provide adequate protection from whiplash injuries for many people in rear - end collisions.

The bumper provided good protection to pedestrians» legs but protection of the pelvis was mixed, with good and poor test results.

The protection provided by the bonnet to the head of a struck pedestrian was good or adequate over most of the bonnet surface, with some poor results recorded on the stiff windscreen pillars.

However, the front edge of the bonnet scored no points, with poor protection being provided.

The protection provided to the head of a struck pedestrian was predominantly adequate or marginal on the bonnet surface, with poor results recorded along the base of the windscreen and on the stiff windscreen pillars.

The bonnet provided predominantly good or adequate protection to the head of a struck pedestrian, with poor results recorded on the front edge of the windscreen and on the stiff windscreen pillars.

The bumper provided good protection to pedestrians» legs and the bonnet gave predominantly good or adequate results, with poor protection only on the stiff windscreen pillars.

The protection provided to the pelvis region was mixed, with areas of good and poor protection.

The bumper provided good protection to pedestrians» legs while protection of the pelvis areas was more mixed, with good and poor results recorded.

The bonnet provided predominantly good or adequate protection for the head of a struck pedestrian, with poor results recorded on the stiff windscreen pillars.

The protection provided to the head of a struck pedestrian was predominantly good or adequate over most of the bonnet surface, with some weak and poor results recorded on the stiff windscreen pillars.

The protection provided to pedestrians» legs was good, and maximum points were scored, but that offered to the pelvis was more mixed, with areas of good and poor performance.

The protection provided to the head of a struck pedestrian was mixed, with roughly equal areas of good and poor protection.

The bonnet surface provided good or adequate protection to the head of a struck pedestrian but performance was weak and poor in tests around the windscreen pillars.

The surface of the bonnet provided good protection to the head of a struck pedestrian over most of its surface, with poor results recorded only on the stiff windscreen pillars.

Poor protection was also provided by the bonnet in most areas where an adult's head might strike.

In almost all areas where a child's head might strike, the bonnet provided good protection but was predominantly poor in those areas likely to be struck by an adult's head.

The protection provided by the bonnet surface to the head of a struck pedestrian was predominantly good or adequate, but weak and poor results were recorded along the base of the windscreen and on the stiff windscreen pillars.

The protection provided by the bonnet to the head of a struck pedestrian was predominantly good or adequate but poor results were recorded along the base of the windscreen and along the stiff windscreen pillars.

The protection provided by the bonnet to the head of a struck pedestrian was predominantly poor or weak, although good in places.

The protection provided by the bonnet to the head of a struck pedestrian was mostly good or adequate, with some poorer results around the base of the windscreen and along the stiff windscreen pillars.

The protection provided by the bonnet to a pedestrian's head was predominantly good or adequate, with poor results recorded only on the stiff windscreen pillars.

However, the protection provided to the pelvis region was predominantly poor.

This area is required by federal standard to provide some protection for an occupant's head, but the Fusion is rated poor overall because of high forces recorded on the driver dummy's head, pelvis, and torso.

The bonnet provided head protection that was predominantly adequate, with good protection towards the centre of the bonnet surface and poor results only at the stiff windscreen pillars.

The protection provided to the head of struck pedestrian ranged predominantly from marginal to good, with some weak and poor results recorded on the stiff windscreen pillars.

The surface of the bonnet provided good protection to the head of a struck pedestrian in almost all areas tested, with some poor results only on the stiff windscreen pillars.

The bumper provided good protection to pedestrians» legs but protection of the pelvis was predominantly poor.

However, the protection provided to the pelvis was more mixed, ranging from good to poor.

The protection provided by the bonnet surface to the head of a struck pedestrian was predominantly good or adequate, with poor results recorded on the stiff windscreen pillars.

The protection provided by the bonnet to the head of a struck pedestrian was predominantly good or adequate, with poor results being recorded on the stiff windscreen pillars.

The protection provided to the head of a struck pedestrian was good or adequate at most test locations, with some poor results recorded along the front edge of the bonnet.

This additional protection is provided under a surety bond issued by the Customer Asset Protection Company (CAPCO), a licensed Vermont insurer with an A + financial strength rating from Standard aprotection is provided under a surety bond issued by the Customer Asset Protection Company (CAPCO), a licensed Vermont insurer with an A + financial strength rating from Standard aProtection Company (CAPCO), a licensed Vermont insurer with an A + financial strength rating from Standard and Poor's.

On the other hand, extremely high quality blue - chip dividend paying stocks such as found on David Fish's lists of Champions, Contenders and Challengers or the Standard & Poor's Dividend Aristocrats, have historically at least, provided a high level of protection against income risk.

Poverty is largely a result of poor governance as demonstrated by irrational controls on people and goods or the failure to provide for the protection of law (or both).

Cotappers help the poor adapt to climate change by funding the planting, restoration, and protection of forests which increase food security, reduce erosion, protect and enhance biodiversity and watersheds, provide shade, and serve as critical hydrological sponges.

[10] Critics suggested requiring Duke / Progress to generate more renewable energy, to provide more protection for the poor against future rate increases, to commit to investments in energy conservation and smart - grid technologies, to allow solar - panel owners to sell electricity directly to consumers rather than only to utilities, and to unlink electric company profits from the amount of power sold.

The report of the first working group «Access to Justice and Rule of Law» contains a number of observations and recommendations with respect to «reforms to the law and justice sector that will provide poor people with the institutional environment, the protections, and the incentives they need to realise their full capabilities and reap the maximum potential return of their existing assets.»