NHA's system of schools is designed to eliminate the achievement gap and
provide a public school choice to families so that their children are prepared for success in high school, college, and beyond.»
Each local educational agency that receives title I funds that has a school designated in improvement (year 2); corrective action; or restructuring pursuant to this paragraph, shall
provide public school choice consistent with section 120.3 of this Title.
Not exact matches
But for other secular homeschoolers, those who do not follow a particular philosophy — which may either mean that they fall into the group of homeschoolers known as eclectic or that they use many
public school methods — they don't or don't seem themselves as having a single, shaping vision that guides all their
choices other than
providing their children with an excellent, safe education.
The Parental
Choice in Education Act would
provide tax credits for those who donate to private and parochial
schools for purposes of scholarships, tax credits to parents who pay tuition to private and parochial
schools and tax credits to teachers - in both
public and private
schools - who make personal purchases of
school supplies and food to support their underprivileged students.
Many children and parents struggle to make healthy food
choices, particularly given that offices,
schools, and other
public settings may
provide limited access to nutritious foods and snacks.
School choice activists have launched a fresh legal challenge to a Maine program that
provides public funding for students to attend secular but not religious private
schools.
Rather than simply
providing an alternative to neighborhood
public schools for a handful of students, the theory says,
school choice programs actually benefit students remaining in their neighborhood
schools, too.
The prediction comes from both proponents and opponents of the tuition - voucher measure, which, by
providing parents with $ 900 for each student enrolled in a private or out - of - district
public school, would be the most extensive
choice program yet adopted by any state.
•
School choice — a strong effort to provide additional federal funds to states that allow funding to follow students to their public or private school of c
School choice — a strong effort to
provide additional federal funds to states that allow funding to follow students to their
public or private
school of c
school of
choice.
All you need to know about NEA's position on charter
schools is actually contained in the original 2001 policy, which states that charters should not exist «simply to
provide a «
choice» for parents who may be dissatisfied with the education that their children are receiving in mainstream
public schools.»
But any comparison of the demographics of students in charter and traditional
public schools provides at best an incomplete picture of segregation because segregation resulting from
school choice policies would occur primarily across
schools, not within
schools.
If traditional
public schools refuse to
provide a safe, orderly, academically enriching environment for young adolescents to prepare for college preparatory high
schools or high - quality career and technical options, then we should encourage the development of charter
schools, magnet
schools, and other
choice strategies that do.
In our balanced budget I proposed a comprehensive strategy to help make our
schools the best in the world — to have high national standards of academic achievement, national tests in 4th grade reading and 8th grade math, strengthening math instruction in middle
schools,
providing smaller classes in the early grades so that teachers can give students the attention they deserve, working to hire more well - prepared and nationally certified teachers, modernizing our
schools for the 21st century, supporting more charter
schools, encouraging
public school choice, ending social promotion, demanding greater accountability from students and teachers, principals and parents.
The law thus established a nationwide test of
public school choice as a means of both
providing better opportunities for individual kids and creating pressure on
schools that are performing poorly.
For years, reformers of left and right have dueled over whether the best way to shake up poorly performing
public schools is to
provide parents with the opportunity to switch to private
schools (through vouchers) or to allow parents to move their children to better
public schools (through
public school choice).
Attitudes: support for diversity (racial integration), a perception of inequity (that the
public schools provide a lower quality education for low - income and minority kids), support for voluntary prayer in the
schools, support for greater parent influence, desire for smaller
schools, belief in what I call the «
public school ideology» (which measures a normative attachment to
public schooling and its ideals), a belief in markets (that
choice and competition are likely to make
schools more effective), and a concern that moral values are poorly taught in the
public schools.
In the first version of its «
Public School Choice: Non-Regulatory Guidance,» published in December 2002, the department built on these basic statutory requirements to encourage districts to provide helpful information to parents: «The [local educational agency] should work together with parents to ensure that parents have ample information, time, and opportunity to take advantage of the opportunity to choose a different public school for their children.&
Public School Choice: Non-Regulatory Guidance,» published in December 2002, the department built on these basic statutory requirements to encourage districts to provide helpful information to parents: «The [local educational agency] should work together with parents to ensure that parents have ample information, time, and opportunity to take advantage of the opportunity to choose a different public school for their children.&
School Choice: Non-Regulatory Guidance,» published in December 2002, the department built on these basic statutory requirements to encourage districts to
provide helpful information to parents: «The [local educational agency] should work together with parents to ensure that parents have ample information, time, and opportunity to take advantage of the opportunity to choose a different
public school for their children.&
public school for their children.&
school for their children.»
Charters are important for stimulating improvement in all
public schools — and
providing even more quality
choices — as research has clearly shown that they do.
For much of the past few years, reflecting general concerns about the quality of
public schooling, discussions of magnet
schools have centered on their potential for
providing intensive instruction in such subjects as science and mathematics, serving as models of effectiveness, and increasing family
choice within the
public system.
An April Gallup poll, for instance, reported that 59 % of American adults agree with Trump's proposal to «
provide federal funding for
school -
choice programs that allow students to attend any private or
public school.»
On the other hand, parental
choice of
schools supported with
public dollars would
provide a more promising framework.
In most states and districts, they
provide very little
choice for American families and very little competition for the regular
public schools.
In two separate lawsuits, opponents of educational
choice alleged that Nevada's ESA violated the state constitution's mandate that the state
provide a «uniform system of common
schools» (Article 11, Section 2), its prohibition against using
public funds for sectarian purposes (Article 11, Section 6), and a clause requiring the state to appropriate funds to operate the district
schools before any other appropriation is enacted for the biennium (Article 11, Section 10).
The sorting of children to
public and private
schools based in large part on random chance
provides a unique opportunity to learn about the effect of
choice on a variety of outcomes.
To
school choice movement veteran Nina Rees, the decision to
provide more funding for
public schools as well as vouchers for private tuition was a virtue.
School choice is a term for K — 12
public education options in the United States, describing a wide array of programs offering students and their families alternatives to publicly
provided schools, to which students are generally assigned by the location of their family residence.
Private
school vouchers, which
provide public funds for students to attend K - 12 private
schools, are one example of an education reform that introduces
choice and competition.
The film burnished the claim by charter advocates that they were involved in «the civil rights issue of our time,» because they were leading the battle to
provide more
choice to poor and disadvantaged children trapped in low - performing
public schools.
The cost of busing, the harm that members of all racial communities feared that the Seattle Plan caused, the desire to attract white families back to the
public schools, and the interest in
providing greater
school choice led the board to abandon busing and to substitute a new student assignment policy that resembles the plan now before us.
For example, Louisiana's Course
Choice program
provides state aid to K - 12 students to cover the cost of courses from colleges,
public high
schools, virtual
schools, and private online providers.
The state
provides families with limited
public school choice.
A majority of Americans support
school choice, including the idea of
providing tax - funded scholarships for poor parents to send their children to
public, private, or parochial
schools, according to a poll released last week.
The Supreme Court, in cases culminating in Agostini [v. Felton], has established the general principle that state educational assistance programs do not have the primary effect of advancing religion if those programs
provide public aid to both sectarian and nonsectarian institutions (1) on the basis of neutral, secular criteria that neither favor nor disfavor religion; and (2) only as a result of numerous private
choices of the individual parents of
school - age children.
Most controversially,
school choice also includes vouchers and tuition tax - credits, which allow families to use
public dollars in order to send their children to private
schools or
provide tax credits to individuals or corporations that make donations to organizations that grant scholarships to students.
In «Many Options in New Orleans
Choice System,» ERA - New Orleans researchers consider to what degree the city's system of school choice, where 93 percent of public school students attend charter schools, provides a variety of distinct options for fam
Choice System,» ERA - New Orleans researchers consider to what degree the city's system of
school choice, where 93 percent of public school students attend charter schools, provides a variety of distinct options for fam
choice, where 93 percent of
public school students attend charter
schools,
provides a variety of distinct options for families.
The article's author, James A. Peyser, explains that even though Boston
Public Schools and the Boston Alliance for Charter Schools affirmed their commitment in September 2011 to «[provide] all Boston students and families with improved schools and broader choice, [through] a new culture of collaboration between the district and charter schools,» charter school growth is stymied by the state cap, which limits students who attend charter schools to 9 percent of the total public student population statewide, and to 18 percent of students in the lowest - performing districts, which includes B
Public Schools and the Boston Alliance for Charter Schools affirmed their commitment in September 2011 to «[provide] all Boston students and families with improved schools and broader choice, [through] a new culture of collaboration between the district and charter schools,» charter school growth is stymied by the state cap, which limits students who attend charter schools to 9 percent of the total public student population statewide, and to 18 percent of students in the lowest - performing districts, which includes
Schools and the Boston Alliance for Charter
Schools affirmed their commitment in September 2011 to «[provide] all Boston students and families with improved schools and broader choice, [through] a new culture of collaboration between the district and charter schools,» charter school growth is stymied by the state cap, which limits students who attend charter schools to 9 percent of the total public student population statewide, and to 18 percent of students in the lowest - performing districts, which includes
Schools affirmed their commitment in September 2011 to «[
provide] all Boston students and families with improved
schools and broader choice, [through] a new culture of collaboration between the district and charter schools,» charter school growth is stymied by the state cap, which limits students who attend charter schools to 9 percent of the total public student population statewide, and to 18 percent of students in the lowest - performing districts, which includes
schools and broader
choice, [through] a new culture of collaboration between the district and charter
schools,» charter school growth is stymied by the state cap, which limits students who attend charter schools to 9 percent of the total public student population statewide, and to 18 percent of students in the lowest - performing districts, which includes
schools,» charter
school growth is stymied by the state cap, which limits students who attend charter
schools to 9 percent of the total public student population statewide, and to 18 percent of students in the lowest - performing districts, which includes
schools to 9 percent of the total
public student population statewide, and to 18 percent of students in the lowest - performing districts, which includes B
public student population statewide, and to 18 percent of students in the lowest - performing districts, which includes Boston.
New Haven, CT — Connecticut's
public charter
school movement turned 20 - years old this past Saturday, marking two decades of
providing students with innovative and new educational opportunities and parents with real
public school choice.
Instead they
provide direction for continued need to address low performing
schools, whether they are traditional
public schools or
schools of
choice.
For example, despite the Supreme Court's 2002 Zelman decision upholding
school voucher programs involving religious schools, my own chapter in the book [«School Choice Litigation after Zelman»] shows how ongoing litigation in state courts continues to shape the development of programs providing school choice in both the private and public se
school voucher programs involving religious
schools, my own chapter in the book [«
School Choice Litigation after Zelman»] shows how ongoing litigation in state courts continues to shape the development of programs providing school choice in both the private and public se
School Choice Litigation after Zelman»] shows how ongoing litigation in state courts continues to shape the development of programs providing school choice in both the private and public se
Choice Litigation after Zelman»] shows how ongoing litigation in state courts continues to shape the development of programs
providing school choice in both the private and public se
school choice in both the private and public se
choice in both the private and
public sectors.
The study
provides evidence, however, that the
Choice Scholarship Program is not enrolling high - performing students compared to
public school peers, aka «cream skimming.»
We then added a question presenting a direct
choice between «improving existing
public schools» and «
providing vouchers.»
Since some Oklahoma children have already started the
school year, the Education Department will phase in some of the consequences of No Child Left Behind that Oklahoma had escaped under the waiver: The state must
provide tutoring services and
public school choice options no later than the 2015 - 16
school year.
HB1 — The Louisiana Scholarship Program was fully funded with bipartisan support in both the House and the Senate,
providing 8,700 students the opportunity to escape failing and underperforming
public schools to attend the private
school of their parents»
choice for the 2014 - 15
school year.
School choice provides an opportunity for
public schools to compete and improve — and for high - performing teachers to be recruited by top
schools.
1) Scholarships — «Under Corbett's plan, scholarships will be
provided to eligible students who will then choose to attend the
public or non-
public school of their
choice.»
New Haven, CT — Connecticut's
public charter
school movement turned 20 years old this month, marking two decades of
providing students with innovative and new educational opportunities and parents with real
public school choice.
While reminding the audience that
public charter
schools prove that «quality and
choice can coexist,» she added that they «are not the one cure - all to the ills that beset education» and
provided an example of three successful Miami - area
schools she recently visited — a
public charter, a private
school, and a traditional
public school, noting that the common factor with all three
schools was the satisfaction of the parents that their chosen
school was
providing their child a quality education.
Regardless of one's philosophical reaction to
school choice, there's no denying
providing such families the option to access their
public school dollars to purchase different educational services is one way to serve underserved students.
SB61 — Louisiana's
Public School Choice bill, authored by Sen. Ben Nevers (D - Bogaulsa), passed with tremendous bipartisan support in both the House and the Senate, which will allow students attending a D or F - rated public school to transfer to the A, B or C - ranked public school of their parents» choice, provided the school has room for the st
Public School Choice bill, authored by Sen. Ben Nevers (D - Bogaulsa), passed with tremendous bipartisan support in both the House and the Senate, which will allow students attending a D or F - rated public school to transfer to the A, B or C - ranked public school of their parents» choice, provided the school has room for the st
School Choice bill, authored by Sen. Ben Nevers (D - Bogaulsa), passed with tremendous bipartisan support in both the House and the Senate, which will allow students attending a D or F - rated public school to transfer to the A, B or C - ranked public school of their parents» choice, provided the school has room for the st
Choice bill, authored by Sen. Ben Nevers (D - Bogaulsa), passed with tremendous bipartisan support in both the House and the Senate, which will allow students attending a D or F - rated
public school to transfer to the A, B or C - ranked public school of their parents» choice, provided the school has room for the st
public school to transfer to the A, B or C - ranked public school of their parents» choice, provided the school has room for the st
school to transfer to the A, B or C - ranked
public school of their parents» choice, provided the school has room for the st
public school of their parents» choice, provided the school has room for the st
school of their parents»
choice, provided the school has room for the st
choice,
provided the
school has room for the st
school has room for the student.
Proponents of ESAs argue these programs
provide parents with more
choice, flexibility and freedom to design their child's education, especially if they are dissatisfied with
public school options.