Sentences with phrase «provide reasons for its judgment»

The court did not provide reasons for its judgment but noted that detailed reasons for the verdict would be provided on February 12.
The court did not provide reasons for its judgment but noted that detailed reasons for -LSB-...]

Not exact matches

However this must be done in such a way that the reasons for both opinions, that is, those favorable and those unfavorable to evolution, be weighed and judged with the necessary seriousness, moderation and measure, and provided that all are prepared to submit to the judgment of the Church, to whom Christ has given the mission of interpreting authentically the Sacred Scriptures and of defending the dogmas of faithful»
Currently, many teachers view observation as the same thing as evaluation when in fact these structures (informal, formal and walkthrough observations) provide a means for gathering what Charlotte Danielson, Dr. Robert Marzano and others experts refer to as a preponderance of evidence in order to make a reasoned judgment about a teacher's overall practice.
(2) signed by an individual, or his parent, to the effect that he has been denied admission to or not permitted to continue in attendance at a public college by reason of race, color, religion, or national origin, and the Attorney General believes the complaint is meritorious and certifies that the signer or signers of such complaint are unable, in his judgment, to initiate and maintain appropriate legal proceedings for relief and that the institution of an action will materially further the orderly achievement of desegregation in public education, the Attorney General is authorized, after giving notice of such complaint to the appropriate school board or college authority and after certifying that he is satisfied that such board or authority has had a reasonable time to adjust the conditions alleged in such complaint, to institute for or in the name of the United States a civil action in any appropriate district court of the United States against such parties and for such relief as may be appropriate, and such court shall have and shall exercise jurisdiction of proceedings instituted pursuant to this section, provided that nothing herein shall empower any official or court of the United States to issue any order seeking to achieve a racial balance in any school by requiring the transportation of pupils or students from one school to another or one school district to another in order to achieve such racial balance, or otherwise enlarge the existing power of the court to insure compliance with constitutional standards.
An adjustment to the continuing education requirement may be made by the Department, provided that the licensee documents good cause that prevents compliance, and the Department determines that there is good cause that prevents compliance, which shall include, but not be limited to, any of the following reasons: poor health or a specific physical or mental disability certified by an appropriate health care professional; extended active duty with the Armed Forces of the United States; or other good cause beyond the licensee's control which, in the judgment of the Department, makes it impossible for the licensee to comply with the continuing education requirements in a timely manner.
The question is thus whether the judgment in CB provides a clear dichotomy and good reasons for the qualification of a restriction under the object or effects heading?
While the Court of Appeal in Denton declined to provide a list of good and bad reasons for compliance it approved the examples previously given in para 41 of the judgment in Mitchell.
Looking at the judgment in the appeal case, it is quite clear what the Court wanted to convey to the Parliament: you can not disregard a citizen's petition in such a way that you either refuse to consider it completely or you provide such an insufficient reasoning that the petitioner has no clue on the reasons for the rejection.
For this reason, our Rules of Civil Procedure provide for the option of a summary judgment motion, which allows the moving party to proceed «directly» to a judge and make a pitch that this particular case can be decided by a motion judge and does not require a full triFor this reason, our Rules of Civil Procedure provide for the option of a summary judgment motion, which allows the moving party to proceed «directly» to a judge and make a pitch that this particular case can be decided by a motion judge and does not require a full trifor the option of a summary judgment motion, which allows the moving party to proceed «directly» to a judge and make a pitch that this particular case can be decided by a motion judge and does not require a full trial.
A judgment where the judge simply lists the cases he or she has referred to — and there are several of these — provides nothing that can be used to validate any of those cases or, of course, his or her own reasons for judgment.
In order to protect courts of law and administrative tribunals, a principle of deliberative secrecy applies to shield those decision - makers from having to make transparent or provide information in regards to the intellectual or other process by which they may have arrived at their decision except as may stand on the record within their reasons for judgment or opinion.
Reasons for judgment were released last week by the BC Supreme Court, Prince George Registry, addressing the entitlement of a witness to a collision obtaining a copy of a statement they provided to ICBC.
At the end of the reasons for judgment in Alberta's first electronic trial in 1159465 Alberta Ltd. v. Adwood Manufacturing Ltd.the Honourable Mr. Justice A.W. Germain of the Court of Queen's Bench provided a schedule to the reasons for judgment in which he reflects on the process and some of the legal issues to have cropped up.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z