Sentences with phrase «provide the answers people»

«I'm excited to be back in a role where I can really dig into the problem areas and provide the answers people are looking for,» he said.

To help provide the answers people need, Faces of Learning is asking people to share personal stories of their most powerful learning experiences; attend and / or organize public events at which people think together about how to improve the local conditions in which people learn; and use a new interactive tool called the Learner Sketch, which invites users to explore their own strengths and challenges among the various mental processes that influence learning.

Not exact matches

The study argues that specialized incubators — those especially for women or people of color — are not the answer, on the grounds that these targeted incubators and accelerators don't provide the same opportunities for entrepreneurs to network within their industries.

For example, ChaCha provides answers via text, Aardvark helps people get answers by reaching out to their extended social networks, and Hunch helps people make decisions by asking them questions about their personal preferences.

The Post «s attempt to make contacts using data provided from Jiedaibao was largely fruitless, with the few people who did answer their phone calls claiming to not be the borrowers in question.

The truth is, relatively few people answer this question effectively — despite the fact that doing so provides an invaluable learning experience.

Make sure to ask questions that get the person providing the reference talking and read between the lines on answers.

The answer: «Bring your own device» programs that allow people to use their personal devices at work — provided they agree to some restrictions.

I would imagine in urban areas like Toronto, Vancouver or Montreal, which have significant populations of recent immigrants, there's probably a significant subset of people who fled from countries where governments do all sorts of nasty things with the information they collect about their citizens and who aren't all that keen to provide such information here (you might say, «sure, but Canada's not Iran», to which the answer would be «exactly»).

Your job is to answer any objections a person has by giving a detailed account of exactly what your product or service provides.

Secure and validate data by rewarding «oracles,» people who provide trustworthy answers and validate that events did in fact occur.

Nothing is the answer a reasonable person should provide.

Not with this question, and not with the countless people who will be reading this and hoping — longing — for an answer that provides some respite from the grief.

And that the Quar «an had 600 - odd years of people asking questions of and critiquing Christianity to build on when supposedly providing answers to the holes in Christianity is not surprising in the least.

In terms of answers about why the bible says what it does sometimes, recognizing that the bible has human authors can provide one straightforward explanation: people can be assholes.

As I write about the violence of God in the Bible and have conversations about this with various people I interact with during the week, I often tell people that one of the reasons this is such an important topic is because Christians need a better answer to provide the world than the ones we have always given.

They continue to ask and provide answers to those existential questions on which any educated person must reflect.

Now, why would people try and find answers in a book written to provide divine guidance for peoples» lives?

Every time science provides an answer, it's the «goddidit» people that get all riled up and defend their indefensible position.

An answer to the question of why it might be a good thing for one person to rule over another is far from obvious, but again the common tradition provides our churches answers that, in principle, they can share.

Rather, it creates in people «s minds needs and fears and hopes for which it can provide the answers.

The problem with asking people to name themselves, however, is that so many of them don't provide very precise answers («just Christian,» for example).

You can not provide all the answers a person needs — it is not fair for you to become the parent or guardian in the friendship.

So I will ask one question where did Jesus spent most of his time, answer with people building relationships, providing compassion and healing / forgiving / teaching....

Offering hope to people, getting them to consider deeper, more important truths, working through tragedies, seeking healing and providing a bit of respite from the rest of the world is a pretty enjoyable job, and it's helped Williams answer in the affirmative.

After these counseling session chapters, Capon provides a chapter where he tries to anticipate and answer all of our objections to what he told the person in his counseling sessions.

Preaching can learn from counseling (and creative education) at another point — that it is far less help to people, in the long run, to give them answers than it is to provide them with resources for finding their own answers.

They are uncomfortable with not being able to provide an answer, when often what is needed is just to be there for the person who has the questions.

And if your assessment is correct, people will choose to answer life's tough questions with the possibilites that provide the best self - protection.

Science would provide all the answers religion purported to give; progressive democracy would provide managed guidance to whatever social yearnings people had.

There is a third answer that most people ignore, «I don't know but I see no reason to act like there is a god until more than cultural myths are provided as evidence.»

Sometimes Christians worry that if we don't provide bullet - proof answers to all of life's questions, people will assume that our faith is unreasonable.

It is not at all clear that fundamentalism provides an answer to the need for personal well - being of large numbers of people over a long period of time.

My last point and Im out... Throughout our great nations history... we always found a way to fight through national issues and come up with solutions... Giving the problems we have now to people in the 50's and 60's... and they may actually come up with a solution... if you earnestly care about making a change... start at the lowest levels of government... go do something... find out costs... expenses... how to get more health care to people... do things like that... quit waiting on the government to provide all the answers... its not the way this country was founded... and not the way we get through problems... If you or ur family does nt have insurance... get a job that can provide you that... instead of hoping the government will do so... If you or ur family lacks access to education... move to an area that excels at it... education is invaluable... Do something about your problem... and quit waiting for the next big lotto...

Hence, even in a society populated by people with all the good will toward one another and all the moral virtue in the world, there would be a need to provide a consistent answer to these folks when they pulled out of the driveway.

Really, Reality, don't you think that people who are on this discussion board would know enough to be able to either recite or at least research and provide correct answers to your arguments convoluted to avoid the truth?

To such critics, no answer we give, no verse we quote, no explanation we provide can ever do away with the fact that Christianity seems to worship a bloodthirsty deity who required the death of others in order to forgive sins and cleanse people of their iniquity.

I no longer believe because I am done listening to people claim to have answers they don't have, it is dishonest, irresponsible, immoral and can be dangerous I am glad you trust science, to a point, but when science is not able to provide an answer you insert god and like I said, that is lazy.

(Even if most of them are answered IN the actual post) Funny how we want people to tell us everything instead of reading the information provided (ie substitutions, loaf pan size etc etc) You're a blessing.

Perhaps the one person best qualified to provide some answers is Chuasiriporn, who lost a 20 - hole playoff to the stoic Pak in the Open.

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

As of a couple weeks ago, there were probably only a few people outside his family and coaches who could provide much of an answer.

My favourite part about writing about my family, kids and parenting in general is that fact that maybe one day I will write something that moves another person or gives them information they were looking for and I was able to provide answers.

This person specializes in breastfeeding and will provide any assistance that is needed and answer any questions that the mom may have.

Or at least it's supposed to level the playing field... Per C. Heiling's answer, in the US it's only 40 % provided you inherit more than $ 11.2 million dollars (which is much more than most people will earn or spend in their lifetime).

Clegg was also applauded for his answer on immigration - and hit his stride when declaring that David Laws and Norman Baker will look at how to provide free transport to young people, and for attacking the Conservatives for trying to take claim the royalties on the Lib Dems income tax threshold plan.

Healthcare can also be provided by states... In fact in many places it is, at least in part, and people who think healthcare is a right would tend to favour that solution too so that this answer seems to beg the question.

And yet teachers have no desire to keep in the profession people who are clearly not up to the job, patients don't care who provides their healthcare so long as it's good quality and free at the point of delivery, and no police officer would defend being able to receive # 100 just for answering a telephone call.

How would you answer those who say that providing information which helps ICE arrest, detain and deport non-UK rough sleepers is incompatible with your mission of supporting vulnerable people?

They also cover: Proportion of calls closed with telephone advice or managed without transport to A&E; Re-contact rate following discharge of care - to ensure that ambulance trusts provide safe and effective care the first time; Call abandonment rate - to ensure ambulance trusts can take 999 calls and that people don't abandon their 999 call before a control room operator has answered; Time to answer calls - measuring how quickly all 999 calls are answered; Time until treatment by an ambulance - dispatched health professional; Category A: eight minutes response time — measuring whether those patients most in need of an emergency ambulance get one quickly.