Without the hidden subsidies
provided by defence lawyers, our court system would grind to a halt.
Not exact matches
Nevertheless, the fact that a person, below the low income cut - off, has his or her income largely consumed
by those basic necessities obviously means that they do not have sufficient income to allow for extraordinary expenses, such as the fees necessary to retain a criminal
defence lawyer to
provide representation in a criminal jury trial.
By contrast, the court stated, a Google search for «Calgary criminal
defence lawyers» immediately produced a lengthy list of «experienced top Calgary criminal
defence lawyers including addresses, telephone numbers, email addresses and other educational information concerning the services they
provide.»
Our Toronto impaired driving
by drugs
lawyers have the knowledge and experience to
provide thorough
defence against all impaired driving, or drinking and driving, charges.
The tort claim process typically includes the following steps: • Investigation of the accident and evidence gathering / review (medical reports, witness statements, etc.) • Expert assessment of the needs and damages of the injured party •
Provide an official statement of claim • Receive statement of
defence • Prepare, submit, and receive affidavits of documents for all parties involved • Attend examinations for discovery with your
lawyer • Attempt to settle the tort claim out of court
by negotiating, mediating, or engaging in pre-trial measures • Trial
Defence lawyer Joseph Neuberger went through the voluminous information
provided by police in a very detailed fashion including the witnesses statements and the statements of the two young ladies who were the «complainants».
Defence lawyer John Navarrete held various discussions with the Crown Attorney's office at 1000 Finch and
provided information for their consideration including a possible motive to lie
by the complainant stemming from her personal mental health issues.
Defence lawyer Joseph Neuberger transcribed all witness statements and created a detailed chart of all inconsistencies, as well as having drafted detailed disclosure requests seeking various critical pieces of information that were alleged to have been
provided by the complainant.
• It should
provide a speedy and cheap method to stop lawsuits if those suits were brought for an improper purpose, namely to harass or intimidate the defendants; • It should put the onus on plaintiffs to prove that their lawsuits were not improper; • It should help rebalance an inequality of financial resources between the parties, possibly
by an order that the plaintiff should pay the defendants» costs at the outset of the litigation; • It should
provide stronger legal protection for citizens engaged in public participation, such as through special
defences; • It should deter people from bringing such suits in the first place,
by exposing plaintiffs, and possibly their directors and officers, and
lawyers, to awards of damages or even punitive damages.
Accordingly, such preparatory documents, even if they were not exchanged with a
lawyer or were not created for the purpose of being sent physically to a
lawyer, may however be covered
by LPP,
provided that they were drawn up exclusively for the purpose of seeking legal advice from a
lawyer in exercise of the rights of the
defence.
HELD So that a person may effectively be able to consult a
lawyer without constraint, and so that the latter may effectively perform his role as collaborating in the administration of justice
by the courts and
providing legal assistance for the purpose of the effective exercise of the rights of the
defence, it may be necessary, in certain circumstances, for the client to prepare working documents or summaries.