Proponents argue that
providing teachers the freedom to customize lessons allows teachers to build off of their existing knowledge of students» content understanding and modify the content to meet the needs of different types of learners (Apkinar & Ball, 2006; Boschman, McKenny, & Voogt, 2014).
Not exact matches
If you speak to heads,
teachers and cooks about the school meals they
provide, they want to be given a little bit more
freedom to make their own choices.
Students want the same
freedom in writing that we do, and
teachers know how to
provide it when given the opportunity.
The Finnish Education System therefore can be characterised by trust,
freedom, flexibility and a concern to put the wellbeing of children at the forefront, with
teachers contributing to a supportive and close relationship with their students balanced with delivering appropriate content and
providing a high standard of academic direction in an equitable manner.
With this comes the responsibility to ensure that
teachers are
provided the
freedom to take risks, knowledge of effective practices, resources to make it happen, and flexibility to incorporate innovative teaching strategies.
• too much school time is given over to test prep — and the pressure to lift scores leads to cheating and other unsavory practices; • subjects and accomplishments that aren't tested — art, creativity, leadership, independent thinking, etc. — are getting squeezed if not discarded; •
teachers are losing their
freedom to practice their craft, to make classes interesting and stimulating, and to act like professionals; • the curricular homogenizing that generally follows from standardized tests and state (or national) standards represents an undesirable usurpation of school autonomy,
teacher freedom, and local control by distant authorities; and • judging
teachers and schools by pupil test scores is inaccurate and unfair, given the kids» different starting points and home circumstances, the variation in class sizes and school resources, and the many other services that schools and
teachers are now expected to
provide their students.
«If you speak to heads,
teachers and cooks about the school meals they
provide, they want to be given a little bit more
freedom to make their own choices.
Chartering empowers thousands of African American families to create a vibrant new public - school sector in Harlem; it liberates a group of Minnesota
teachers to start and run their own schools; and it
provides a Teach for America alum the
freedom to start a network of college - prep charters serving Mexican immigrants in Texas.
And principals and
teachers must have the
freedom and flexibility to meet those standards, while school districts
provide them with adequate resources and support.
It
provides freedom for children within a structure: children choose their work, exercising choice over their learning, sometimes with guidance by the
teachers, if a child loses focus.
I'm fortunate to work in a district that
provides teachers a significant amount of instructional
freedom.
Much has been written about the trust and autonomy Finnish schools
provide teachers, but I would like some firsthand examples of how that autonomy extends to students having
freedom or involvement in the learning process.
Charter schools are tuition - free public schools that foster a relationship between parents,
teachers and students to create an environment where parents can be more involved,
teachers are given the
freedom to innovate, and students are
provided the structure best suited for their learning.
Although
teachers are no longer center stage, the
freedom provided by the flipped classroom makes their role that much more crucial.
The mission of the American Federation of
Teachers is, «to improve the lives of our members and their families; to give voice to their legitimate professional, economic and social aspirations; to strengthen the institutions in which we work; to improve the quality of the services we
provide; to bring together all members to assist and support one another, and to promote democracy, human rights and
freedom in our union, in our nation and throughout the world.»
Twenty - five percent of voters said the state should keep tenure for public school
teachers to
provide them job protections and the
freedom to teach potentially controversial topics without fear of reprisals.
It is crucial for organizations to have strategic goals and lead professional development related to those, however,
teachers need the
freedom to learn what is important to them as well and schools need to
provide time, money and resources to make this a priority.
Charter schools
provide teachers with the
freedom and flexibility to innovate to best meet their studentsï ¿ 1/2 needs.
«Academic
freedom generally
provides much more potent protection for what a
teacher says as a citizen outside the school than for what the
teacher says in the classroom, where the school board is largely in control of the curriculum» (p. 43).
There is potential beacon of hope here, as the Government have plans to make Key Stage 1 SATs non-statutory, which should
provide greater
freedoms to school and
teachers to offer the curriculum that pupils need.
The defense maintained that the contested laws serve legitimate governmental interests — academic
freedom, attracting and retaining quality
teachers, and
providing employment protections for
teachers to insure that they are not unfairly dismissed.
First - year
teachers often feel underprepared when they first enter the classroom, and are less likely than more experienced
teachers to report being well prepared to implement state or district curriculum.45 As a result, nearly one in seven new
teachers leaves the classroom before completing their third year, with most citing classroom management, the burden of curriculum
freedom, and unsupportive school environments as their greatest stressors.46 Too often,
teachers begin their careers in a sink - or - swim situation, with little to no formal induction or support system and inadequate professional learning.47 By
providing new
teachers with evidence - based professional learning — including through comprehensive, high - quality induction programs — schools and districts can create a more supportive pathway to success in the classroom.
The first year of teaching is often a blur of lessons learned in the hot seat while students fail to learn all that they could.13 Nearly 1 in 7 new
teachers leave the classroom before completing their third year, with most citing classroom management, the burden of curriculum
freedom, and unsupportive school environments as their greatest challenges.14 According to the National Center for Education Statistics,
teachers with three or fewer years of teaching experience are less likely than more experienced
teachers to report being very well - prepared to maintain order and discipline in the classroom.15 Additionally, new
teachers were less likely than more experienced
teachers to report being well - prepared to implement state or district curricula.16 Residency and induction programs can
provide essential practical training in classroom management, assessment and data literacy, and differentiation or special education techniques.17
According to the draft regulations, districts in this competition will have to «
provide the information, tools, and supports that enable
teachers to truly differentiate instruction and meet the needs of each child,» as well as, «allow students significantly more
freedom to study and advance at their own pace — both in and out of school.»
Mills
Teacher Scholars gives
teachers the
freedom to admit they don't know something that they find crucial to their students» success, and then
provides them with the time, space and resources to attempt to find answers.
More charters would «foster a partnership between parents,
teachers, and students to create an environment in which parents can be more involved,
teachers are given the
freedom to innovate, and students are
provided the structure they need to learn,» the group says.
Freire
provides the instructional
freedom and autonomy
teachers want and need.
Truly effective technologies, such as adaptive technologies that can deliver instruction based on what a student knows and needs to learn next, can personalize learning for the student and
provide the
teacher with the
freedom to work individually with students who need additional supports.