Sentences with phrase «proving the theory of»

Evolutionists try to form these individual species into a link according to similar major features such as wings or four legs, but this simply proves the Theory of Evolution to be a fraud.

There is no empirically proven theory of gravity.

Over 150 years of building on and refining the original hypothesis has proven the theory of evolution to be true over and over again.

Thats all fine and dandy except with science you need to try and experiment and recreate those events to help prove the theory of creationism.

I will prove the theory of natural selection up close and personal.

The not - so - late Doctor Reginald Stockhausen proved the theories of the esteemed Dr. Eric M.D. Berne to be base on a small sampling and inherently flawed due to a comprised control study.

This might frighten your child or prove their theory of «if I behave badly enough Mum / Dad will take notice»!

He believes the data would paint a «very unflattering picture» that proves his theory of fare evasion being «a crime of poverty.»

Would the detection of gravitational waves from just after the big bang finally prove your theory of cosmic inflation?

It's interesting that you assert that the Avida software program proves the theory of evolution when, in fact, it does more to prove the theory of intelligent design.

Now, iron - rich particles from steel manufacturing and coal burning, collected in the East China Sea, have been found to have a thick sulphate coating containing soluble iron that provides the «smoking gun'to prove the theory of acid iron dissolution.

Using logistics and proven theories of supply and demand, relocation can be the key to ending the needless euthanasia of animals because of lack of kennel space.

For example, many tests have been done to prove the theory of a photon to be false, and many to prove a wave is instead a particle.

You have spent a great deal of time describing why you believe that the science behind the hockey stick phenomenon is more uncertain than how it was portrayed, and you have spent a lot of time analyzing the tribalism behind what you characterized as a «dishonest» approach to representing data, but from what I've seen, you have spent remarkably little time talking about the volumes of unsound data which were deliberately fabricated, or at the very least twisted, by those with a vested interest in proving theories of AGW incorrect.

So that means some crackpot creationist can say they are a scientist that's proven the Theory of Evolution wrong.

For example, is the subject so complex that no single person can grasp the whole of it, just as no single person, however brilliant, could prove the theory of AGW fallacious?

And lo and behold, recent droughts, fires, and storms — the last being Sandy — undoubtedly have proven the theories of my much beloved «skeptics,» about the causal factors in public opinion on climate change.

This publication has been subject to a considerable amount of hype, for instance apparently «[LC09] has absolutely, convincingly, and irrefutably proven the theory of Anthropogenic Global Warming to be completely false.»

Nashville, TN About Blog PET TAO combines the time proven theories of Eastern Food Therapy with Western Nutritional Science for truly holistic canned dog and cat food and treats.

Not exact matches

(That little theory proves a lack of blood flow will definitely impair judgment; back then my scrawny arms couldn't have filled out the tightest of shirtsleeves.)

In a moment of hubris or weakness or lunacy — take your pick — I decided to prove those theories were right.

But this new model is still far from proven, and physicists will need more data and a better understanding of string theory before that's possible.

«On that dangerous theory, the government is secretly blacklisting people as suspected terrorists and giving them the impossible task of proving themselves innocent of a threat they haven't carried out.»

The response by counterterror officials would be very different depending on which of these theories proves to be true.

That's not the first time I've made such a discovery: It seems that for almost every study indicating the truth of one theory, there's another proving the opposite.

The theory of disruptive innovation, introduced in these pages in 1995, has proved to be a powerful way of thinking about innovation - driven growth.

Its research activities seek to develop actionable, prescriptive theory that can guide general managers in the decisions they must make, re-invigorating general management research by following a proven research process, refining it through collaboration with practitioners, and then distributing it to a broad audience In pursuit of these goals, the Forum both hosts conferences to bring together academic experts, leading practitioners, and Harvard Business School alumni to develop current ideas and engages in extensive publishing activities.

«Lower oil prices have not proven to be as stimulative as economic theory once had it,» said Daniel Yergin, the energy historian and vice chairman of the IHS consultancy.

To beat roulette, Thorp invented new applications of probability theory and even wrote best - selling book Beat the Dealer — the first book to mathematically prove that the house advantage in blackjack could be overcome by card counting.

In theory, proponents could prove that economic benefits would offset the environmental damage, but B.C.'s Ministry of Transportation, which must implement the government's tunnel - removal plan, chose instead to avoid the issue.

Here is an example of a Litecoin graph so I can prove this theory in practice.

Many of the theories which were taught as scientific fact have been proved wrong.

The big bang theory, though not proven, DOES have a mountain of scientific FACTS that support it!

Behe presented the evidence for his hypothesis, Ken Miller proved how each piece of evidence he put forward was false, and the theory of evolution once again proved to be the top candidate to explain the phenomena of biological changes over time.

Theory of evolution has NEVER been proven.

It was theory decades ago, but has since been proven, in part by the existence of the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB), but also by astronomical observations and by particle accelerator experiments.

The people that have brought forth these theories, none of which have been proven, have not jumped to the God of Abraham as you choose to do.

@U are a tool... the theory of Religion certainly has not been proven while the basis of evolution (natural selection) is observed every minute of every day.

This may come as a shock to you — BUT - evolution could not be proven beyond a reasonable doubt in court — if it is a «Law» of science and not a theory explain to me why Scientist in the same field have differing opinions theory has undergone massive changes since the 1850's when Darwin first came up with the THEORY — there are a lot of interesting similarities to true science which makes it sound so plausible, but it should sound good — After all the top scientist / humanists in the world promote it and they are all prettytheory explain to me why Scientist in the same field have differing opinions theory has undergone massive changes since the 1850's when Darwin first came up with the THEORY — there are a lot of interesting similarities to true science which makes it sound so plausible, but it should sound good — After all the top scientist / humanists in the world promote it and they are all prettytheory has undergone massive changes since the 1850's when Darwin first came up with the THEORY — there are a lot of interesting similarities to true science which makes it sound so plausible, but it should sound good — After all the top scientist / humanists in the world promote it and they are all prettyTHEORY — there are a lot of interesting similarities to true science which makes it sound so plausible, but it should sound good — After all the top scientist / humanists in the world promote it and they are all pretty smart

Like all science, of course, it is falsifiable — but no one has ever proven it wrong, and no one has ever come up with a better theory that explains so much of the natural world using one simple concept, testable using logic and experiment.

In the early days of his influence on literary studies, his theories proved particularly pernicious, sending scholars scurrying after phallic symbols and psychoanalyzing authors.

More like from chemistry to astrophysics — there's a lot about the universe that can't be explained but but physicists put a lot of faith in theory until their definitevly proven wrong.

A person of science, such as yourself should be open to all possibilities, lest your theory be proven incorrect and you are left with nothing.

In science something is called a theory because there is a chance of it being proven, however that doesn't mean it can or ever will, it's sciences way of saying it doesn't have a 100 % answer.

Thereby proving the theory that 89 % of the world's population are infantile morons who long to be parented their entire adult lives.

Darwin was hopeful that future fossils would prove his theory correct, but instead, the lack of transitional links has proven his theory to be wrong.

Charles Darwin admitted that fossils of the transitional links between species would have to be found in order to prove his «Theory of Evolution.»

Theory is a tested, proven conclusion (i.e. a hypothesis becomes a theory once it is proven or accepted as truth, such as the theory of relativity, computational theory,Theory is a tested, proven conclusion (i.e. a hypothesis becomes a theory once it is proven or accepted as truth, such as the theory of relativity, computational theory,theory once it is proven or accepted as truth, such as the theory of relativity, computational theory,theory of relativity, computational theory,theory, etc..

They're just mad more people don't want to share their depressing theories on the non-existence of anything the scientific method can't prove.

You have correct definitions, except you left out the definition of a SCIENTIFIC theory, which is different than a regular theory in that these theories are true but still might be able to be proven false.