«The research by Rubinstein and McCarthy is
proving valid our theory of action.»
Not exact matches
@ME II — And I would argue it is
valid simply because the big bang
theory has not been
proven without a doubt to be true.
The most that any
valid scientific finding has ever
proven is that the old well - tested
theory was wrong.
Science eventually
proved those
theories to be correct, but that doesn't mean that every crackpot
theory is just as
valid as any other because some of them were
proved correct — that's stupid reasoning!!!
In science, experiments are designed to (dis)
prove that a
theory conforms to
valid deductive reasoning.
I follow the science being done at CERN and am fascinated at how many
theories are being
proven valid, not to mention the amazing discoveries by the NASA Space Program.
For it to be a
valid theory it has to
prove why in the absence of increased co2 it became warm enough to grow grapes in England and barely in Greenland, similar plants in China.
Yes, the CAGW
theory has been
proved valid ONLY in computer models.
As to whether the
theories built on that data are
proven valid is another level of inquiry after that.
If the
theory passes the tests it remains
valid (not
proven).
But that does not
prove relativity is wrong, nor establish aether
theory as
valid; it merely explains the origin of «mad scientists»; such as will believe uncritically in the outputs of «vapour - free» climate models.
Equations nor
theory (and I regard equations and
theory as just alternative and equally
valid means of expression) don't «
prove» that either way.