You can't blame a science agency for canning some clown that disavows real science and spews
pseudoscience nonsense instead.
Not exact matches
Nonsense on Stilts by Massimo Pigliucci (University of Chicago Press) A tour of solid science, shaky science, and
pseudoscience, this crash course in critical thinking by biologist and philosopher Pigliucci includes handy rules for evaluating the confused public discourse on climate change, evolution, and even UFOs.
In his 2010 book
Nonsense on Stilts (University of Chicago Press), philosopher of science Massimo Pigliucci concedes that there is «no litmus test,» because «the boundaries separating science, nonscience, and
pseudoscience are much fuzzier and more permeable than Popper (or, for that matter, most scientists) would have us believe.»
what Weston Price (with or without the foundation) has to offer to us is that limited observations lead to ecological fallacies which leads to
pseudoscience (the same applies for vegan
nonsense, e.g. «The China Study»).
I've written a lot about dogs and dominance and my take on this topic hasn't changed at all, namely, dogs display dominance but dominance should not be used in training / teaching dogs to coexist with us or with other dogs [please see «Social Dominance is not a Myth,» «Dominance and
Pseudoscience: Making Sense of
Nonsense,» renowned primatologist Dr. Dario Maestripieri's outstanding essay called «Social Dominance Explained: Part I» (in which he mildly takes me to task for trying to accommodate the deniers), and many links therein.]
That's kind of all you'll need to know — everything else is a mixture of predictable twists and some
nonsense pseudoscience that's clearly aiming at Kojima's famous style but falling far short.
I have no idea what you are referring to, except perhaps that the rote regurgitation of long - since and many - times - over debunked denialist
nonsense is mercifully (and no doubt laboriously) deleted by the RC moderators — unlike every other open blog on the Internet where any attempt to discuss the science of anthropogenic global warming is quickly drowned out by a torrent of
pseudoscience, conspiracy theories, blatant falsehoods, and hate speech against climate scientists.
Miskolczi is pure
pseudoscience, so it is sad to see so much time wasted on his
nonsense.