A dog bite can cause physical harm, pain, and
psychological damage where people especially children feel vulnerable and insecure in their place of residence and neighborhood.
Not exact matches
In the latter cases the
psychological injury will be compensable on the basis of a pre-existing thin skull, except only in cases
where the
psychological problem is so dominant as a pre-existing condition and the injuries sustained in the accident are so trivial that the accident can no longer be said to be a sufficient cause in law to support an award of
damages on the basis of proximate cause.
Examples of the application of the «thin skull» principle to the award of
damages for
psychological symptoms in circumstances
where there was an existing predisposition include Enge v. Trerise (1960), 26 D.L.R. (2d) 529 (B.C.C.A.), Cotic v. Gray (1981), 17 C.C.L.T. 138 (Ont.C.A.)
The court considered and ruled on: whether aggravated
damages, which are purely compensatory, are appropriate
where there has already been an award for
psychological damage; whether exemplary
damages should be awarded; and whether chief constables are vicariously liable for the actions of their officers.
The argument that
where there has been a significant award for
psychological injury there should be no, or a limited, award of aggravated
damages — put forward in Goswell v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis CA, 1998, unreported — has again been rejected.
Troll insurance will help in the instances
where legal action is taken to cover prosecution, but that's reactive and doesn't particularly undo the
damage of missing school or work (not to mention the
psychological costs).