Not exact matches
I will argue that theoretical models,
such as the «billard ball model» of a gas, are not merely convenient calculating devices or temporary
psychological aids in the formulation of theories; they have an important continuing role in suggesting both modifications in existing theories and the discovery of new
phenomena.
To seek one's humanity in a person of the same sex is to seek «a substitute for the despised partner,» and as
such it constitutes «physical,
psychological and social sickness, the
phenomenon of perversion, decadence and decay.»
For example, for the frequently used word «events» (used in describing natural
phenomena in space - time coordinate systems) he substituted the term «actual occasions,» which for him gave a more accurate (and richer) picture of «real» or «concrete» happenings in the natural world.11 In this regard, he avoided the use of
such commonly employed metaphysical terms
such as «sensation» and «perception» — derived from seventeenth and eighteenth philosophers
such as Locke, Berkeley, Hume and Kant — since for him they had a narrow
psychological rather than appropriate epistemological meanings.
But for me the most destructive aspect of
phenomena such as Let Our Kids Be Kids is how they incite the young to see their problems through the prism of
psychological harm.
And they have done so explicitly, whereas «denial» is
such a well - known
psychological phenomenon it is part of the popular lexicon.